Follow us on social

google cta
Netanyahu Trump White House

Trump offers Gaza plan that will please no one but Trump

The White House again gives Netanyahu the red carpet treatment, abandoning real leverage for optics

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

During his joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, President Donald Trump announced a new plan that he said is “getting everything solved in the Middle East.”

Unfortunately, the plan appears designed to once again portray Palestinians as opposing an end to the violence, as Americans involved in the Israel-Palestine conflict have done for decades.

If Trump wanted Hamas to agree to the deal, he would have sent it to them before presenting it as a fait accompli. Yet as of Saturday, Hamas leaders said they had not received the proposal. Yet Trump proceeded with announcing the plan publicly anyway. During the press conference, he said that if Hamas rejects the deal, “as you know, Bibi, you have our full backing to do what you would."

The plan includes the following points:

  • A permanent ceasefire in Gaza
  • The release of all Israeli hostages and many Palestinian hostages, including all women and children detained since October 7
  • Gradual Israeli withdrawal from most of the Gaza Strip, although a security perimeter would remain, further shrinking the already tiny enclave
  • Hamas members that agree to give up their weapons would be given amnesty and permitted to leave Gaza for receiving countries
  • Gaza would be governed by a temporary mechanism that includes both Trump and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair
  • Palestinians would not be forced to leave, and anyone who leaves would have the right of return

In point #19, the plan provides a provisional mention of Palestinian self-determination, stating, “while Gaza redevelopment advances and when the PA reform program is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood.” Essentially, Palestinians are asked to accept foreign occupation and full disarmament, with no guarantee that Israel’s campaign of indiscriminate bombing will not resume, nor that their right to self-determination will be respected.

On Friday, Trump sounded optimistic, declaring that “[i]t's looking like we have a deal,” after a meeting with nine Arab and Muslim-majority countries on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly resulted in support for the plan. The Arab states insisted on several points, including that “full aid will be sent immediately into the Gaza Strip,” to be distributed by the U.N. and the Red Crescent, rather than the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has been involved in the deaths of more than 2500 Palestinians since beginning operations in May.

The Arab states also demanded the plan state that Israel would not annex Gaza or the West Bank, but the 20-point plan makes no mention of the West Bank. While buy-in from regional states is important, even more important is buy-in from Palestinians, who were not present at the meeting.

Trump’s Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner drafted the plan, discussions of which have included a proposal to have Blair oversee the Gaza International Transitional Authority. Critics have described the former British prime minister as seeking to become a colonial viceroy: when asked about the possibility of Blair serving as the interim political leader in Gaza, Husam Badran, a member of Hamas’ political bureau, told Al-Jazeera, “The Palestinian people have the right to self-determination, as recognized by international law. We are not minors needing guardianship…[Blair’s] bloody record, especially his role in the Iraq War, is infamous. He has brought nothing good to Palestine, the Arabs, or the Muslims.”

While many supporters of Palestinian self-determination decry the Witkoff-Kushner plan as intended to yet again sideline Palestinian demands for a viable state, many inside Gaza are desperate for an end to the violence. The Israeli military continues to force its way into Gaza City, leveling residential buildings and killing countless innocent civilians who were unable to flee. Although Israel has allowed limited food to enter Gaza, it continues to block crucial supplies, including high protein peanut butter paste desperately needed to save starving children, as U.N. Relief Chief Tom Fletcher told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on the sidelines of UNGA High Level Week.

Netanyahu’s willingness to agree to even a nominal ceasefire plan generated speculation about whether Trump was finally pressuring him to accept, as he did to secure the January ceasefire. According to a recent poll, a majority of Israelis want the war to end in order to finally achieve the release of the Israeli hostages. Israel’s own security establishment has concluded that there is no military solution in Gaza, and last month, Israel’s Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, opposed the security cabinet’s demand that the IDF fully occupy Gaza, and questioned the plan to take control of Gaza City.

Yet Netanyahu’s far-right coalition partners oppose any ceasefire plan, maintaining that Israel must achieve “total victory” over Hamas. An Israeli newspaper reported that Netanyahu’s “challenge is to convince ministers that this [plan] is nothing more than rhetoric.” Similar to when he agreed to the January ceasefire, Netanyahu has no intention of ending Israel’s war on Gaza.

Americans’ support for Israel has plummeted in the past two years, with a majority now opposed to sending additional economic and military aid to Israel, according to a newly released Times/Siena poll.

Trump is aware that his party’s unconditional support for Israel is splintering his base. By announcing this plan in a manner that appears largely intended to portray Israel as ready for peace and Hamas as obstructing the deal, he seems determined to reinforce the long-standing Israeli/American narrative that there is “no partner for peace” on the Palestinian side, meaning that Israel must reluctantly continue fighting. When in fact, Hamas has offered multiple deals to end the war which Israel has rejected. With the recent sale of TikTok to pro-Israel billionaire Larry Ellison, Trump seems to think he can wrestle back control of the narrative.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top photo credit: Members of the media raise their hands as U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands at a joint press conference in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 29, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Von Der Leyen Zelensky
Top image credit: paparazzza / Shutterstock.com
The collapse of Europe's Ukraine policy has sparked a blame game

They are calling fast-track Ukraine EU bid 'nonsense.' So why dangle it?

Europe

Trying to accelerate Ukraine’s entry into the European Union makes sense as part of the U.S.-sponsored efforts to end the war with Russia. But there are two big obstacles to this happening by 2027: Ukraine isn’t ready, and Europe can’t afford it.

As part of ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine, the Trump administration had advanced the idea that Ukraine be admitted into the European Union by 2027. On the surface, this appears a practical compromise, given Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s concession that Ukraine will drop its aspiration to join NATO.

keep readingShow less
World War II Normandy
Top photo credit: American soldiers march a group of German prisoners along a beachhead in Northern France after which they will be sent to England. June 6, 1944. (U.S. Army Signal Corps Photographic Files/public domain)

Marines know we don't kill unarmed survivors for a reason

Military Industrial Complex

As the Trump Administration continues to kill so-called Venezuelan "narco terrorists" through "non-international armed conflict" (whatever that means), it is clear it is doing so without Congressional authorization and in defiance of international law.

Perhaps worse, through these actions, the administration is demonstrating wanton disregard for centuries of Western battlefield precedent, customs, and traditions that righteously seek to preserve as many lives during war as possible.

keep readingShow less
Amanda Sloat
Top photo credit: Amanda Sloat, with Department of State, in 2015. (VOA photo/Wikimedia Commons)

Pranked Biden official exposes lie that Ukraine war was inevitable

Europe

When it comes to the Ukraine war, there have long been two realities. One is propagated by former Biden administration officials in speeches and media interviews, in which Russian President Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion had nothing to do with NATO’s U.S.-led expansion into the now shattered country, there was nothing that could have been done to prevent what was an inevitable imperialist land-grab, and that negotiations once the war started to try to end the killing were not only impossible, but morally wrong.

Then there is the other, polar opposite reality that occasionally slips through when officials think few people are listening, and which was recently summed up by former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Europe at the National Security Council Amanda Sloat, in an interview with Russian pranksters whom she believed were aides to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.