Follow us on social

google cta
Benjamin Netanyahu

Another poll shows Americans’ declining support for Israel

And their favorability of Netanyahu is abysmally low

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The percentage of registered American voters who believe that support for Israel serves the U.S. national interest has fallen sharply over the last 21 months of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, according to the findings of a new survey released by the Quinnipiac University Poll.

Less than half of American voters — 47% — say they believe that support for Israel is in the national interest of the United States, according to the survey, which was based on the responses of 1,276 self-identified registered voters September 18–21.

That was down from 69% in December 2023, three-and-a-half months after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel that launched the war.

Forty-one percent of the survey’s respondents said they believed U.S. support for Israel does not serve the national interest. The remainder offered no opinion.

Opinions of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were even more negative. Only 21% of respondents said they had a favorable opinion of Netanyahu, who is scheduled to address the U.N. General Assembly Friday. Nearly half — 49% — said they held an unfavorable view of the Israeli leader, while 31% either refused to answer (3%) or hadn’t hear enough to offer an opinion (28%).

The survey also found nearly as strong disapproval of “the way (President) Donald Trump is handling the Israel-Hamas conflict.” Only 31% of respondents said they approved of his handling of the war, which has been characterized by virtually unconditional U.S. support for Netanyahu. A solid majority of respondents (56%) said they disapproved.

In a survey released August 27, a separate Quinnipiac poll found that no less than 50% of respondents, including one of five self-identified Republican voters, said they believed that Israel was committing a genocide in Gaza.

Meanwhile, significantly more voters, according to the latest survey, believe that supporting Ukraine serves U.S. national interests than those who believe that supporting Israel does. Nearly two in three voters (64%), including 50% of self-identified Republicans, said they believe that supporting Ukraine serves U.S. interests, while only one if four (26%) said they believe U.S. support for Kyiv did not serve the national interest.

One in three respondents (33%), and only 3% of self-identified Democrats, said they approved of Trump’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, while 56%, including 14% of Republicans, voiced disapproval.

The poll’s findings on Israel are consistent with other recent surveys that show unprecedented declines in support for Israel.

A poll released last month by the University of Maryland’s Critical Issues series found for the first time in a national poll that more Americans sympathized with Palestinians (28%) than with Israelis (22%). It also found that 41% of its respondents believed that Israel was committing a genocide or a campaign “akin to genocide” in Gaza.

A Gallup poll released in late July found that public support for Israel’s actions in Gaza had fallen from 50% to 32% over 17 months. It found that support for Israel had hemorrhaged among younger voters, Democrats and self-identified Independents.

The latest Quinnipiac poll found significant differences in views about support for Israel serving U.S. national interests. Three of every four self-identified Republicans said they believe that support for Israel serves U.S. interests, while only 36% of Democrats and 37% of Independents agreed.

Remarkably, more Independents (53%) than Democrats (49%) said they believed support for Israel did not serve U.S. national interests. Nearly one in five Republicans (19%) agreed.

Republicans were also significantly disposed to view Netanyahu favorably (47%), while only 4% of Democrats and 14% agreed. Seven out of ten Democrats (70%) and nearly six of ten (58%) of Independents said they viewed him unfavorably as did one in five (20%) of Republicans.


Top image credti: Gil Cohen Magen / Shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
NPT
Top image credit: Milos Ruzicka via shutterstock.com

We are sleepwalking into nuclear catastrophe

Global Crises

In May of his first year as president, John F. Kennedy met with Israeli President David Ben-Gurion to discuss Israel’s nuclear program and the new nuclear power plant at Dimona.

Writing about the so-called “nuclear summit” in “A State at Any Cost: The Life of David Ben-Gurion,” Israeli historian Tom Segev states that during this meeting, “Ben-Gurion did not get much from the president, who left no doubt that he would not permit Israel to develop nuclear weapons.”

keep readingShow less
Ambassador Robert Hunter
Top photo credit: Former NATO Ambassador Robert Hunter at the American Academy of Diplomacy's 17th Annual Awards Luncheon, 12/14/2006. (Reuters)

RIP Amb. Robert Hunter, who warned about NATO expansion

Europe

The world of foreign policy restraint is poorer today with the passing of Robert Hunter, an American diplomat, who was the U.S. ambassador to NATO in 1993-1998. He also served as a senior official on both the Western Europe and Middle East desks in President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Council.

For decades, Hunter was a prominent, sober, and necessary voice of restraint in Washington. To readers of Responsible Statecraft, he was an occasional author who shared his insights, particularly on Europe. To those of us who knew Robert personally, he was a mentor and a friend whose tremendous knowledge was matched only by his generosity in sharing it.

keep readingShow less
NATO Summit 2025
Top photo credit: NATO Summit, the Hague, June 25, 2025. (Republic of Slovenia/Daniel Novakovič/STA/flickr)

Will NATO survive Trump?

Europe

Over the weekend, President Donald Trump threatened to place new punitive tariffs on European allies until they acquiesce to his designs on Greenland, an escalation of his ongoing attempts to acquire the large Arctic island for the United States.

Critics loudly decried the move as devastating for the transatlantic relationship, echoing Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Fredericksen’s earlier warning that a coercive U.S. seizure of the semi-autonomous Danish territory would mean the end of NATO.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.