Follow us on social

Osprey crash in Japan kills 8 US soldiers

Osprey crash in Japan kills 8 US soldiers

The space-age aircraft has been involved in four deadly accidents since last year

Reporting | QiOSK

Update, Dec. 7 at 8:48 a.m.: The Pentagon announced that it will ground its entire Osprey fleet after announcing that all eight airmen onboard the V-22 that crashed off the coast of Japan had died. Since last year, 19 service members have died in V-22 training crashes.

A V-22 Osprey crashed over the sea near Japan on Wednesday, killing at least one of the aircraft’s eight crew members and marking the fourth deadly accident involving the controversial aircraft since 2022.

The exact reasons for the crash, as well as the condition of the other soldiers onboard, remain unknown at this time. Some witnesses said one of the aircraft’s engines “appeared to be on fire as it approached an airport for an emergency landing, despite clear weather and light wind,” according to a Reuters report drawing on local Japanese news outlets.

The Osprey, known for its distinctive “tiltrotor” design that allows it to take off like a helicopter and fly like a plane, has earned a reputation in its two decades of service as one of the least reliable aircraft in the Pentagon’s stockpile, leading some to dub it the “widow maker.”

Osprey crashes have now left at least 12 soldiers dead in less than two years. These incidents have led some analysts to call for the V-22 to be retired.

While other aircraft have higher overall crash rates, the Osprey stands out for the circumstances in which accidents have occurred, according to Julia Gledhill of the Project on Government Oversight.

“[W]hat’s striking about the Osprey is that since the aircraft became operational in 2007, most of the fatalities involving the aircraft have happened during training exercises, not active operations,” Gledhill wrote in RS earlier this year.

Persistent issues with the Osprey’s engine and gearbox have led the Air Force, Marines, and Navy to each ground at least part of their fleet over the past year. It is not clear which service was operating the Osprey that crashed near Japan on Wednesday.

The V-22 is not the only military plane that has seen an increase in crashes in recent years, a fact that experts attribute to poor oversight and a steady drop in flight hours for pilots, many of whom spend much of their training time in simulations rather than in the air.

The Pentagon created a new Joint Safety Council last year in response to the uptick in crashes, but the panel has yet to publish any public reports or share the status of its work.


Photo credit: VanderWolf Images/ Shutterstock
Reporting | QiOSK
Rand Paul Donald Trump
Top photo credit: Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) (Shutterstock/Mark Reinstein) and President Trump (White House/Molly Riley)

Rand Paul to Trump: Don't 'abandon' MAGA over Maduro regime change

Washington Politics

Sen. Rand Paul said on Friday that “all hell could break loose” within Donald Trump’s MAGA coalition if the president involves the U.S. further in Ukraine, and added that his supporters who voted for him after 20 years of regime change wars would "feel abandoned" if he went to war and tried to topple Nicolas Maduro, too.

President Trump has been getting criticism from some of his supporters for vowing to release the files of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and then reneging on that promise. Paul said that the Epstein heat Trump is getting from MAGA will be nothing compared to if he refuses to live up to his “America First” foreign policy promises.

keep readingShow less
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.