Follow us on social

Netanyahu to UN: Get your peacekeepers out of Lebanon

Netanyahu to UN: Get your peacekeepers out of Lebanon

The Israel PM said Sunday they should evacuate if they don't want to get hurt

Analysis | QiOSK

UPDATE 10/13: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel regretted the “harm done” to UNIFIL peacekeepers this week in Southern Lebanon but if the United Nations doesn't want further injuries to its forces then it needs to “remove them from the danger zone.”


UPDATE 10/12: A fifth UN peacekeeper has been injured in the village of Naquora in Southern Lebanon. According to UNIFIL the peacekeeper was undergoing surgery from a bullet wound on Saturday but would not confirm how he became to be shot. UNIFIL also said its buildings at a position in the village of Ramyah sustained "significant damage due to explosions from nearby shelling" on Friday. Also Friday, two Sri Lankan men serving as peacekeepers were also injured in Naquora. The IDF acknowledged that its troops were responsible and would be investigated "at the highest levels".



According to reports, Indonesian citizens serving as peacekeepers under the UNIFIL (United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon) were injured when the Israeli military fired on their headquarters Thursday.

This is the third incident in two days. From UNIFIL today:

This morning, two peacekeepers were injured after an IDF Merkava tank fired its weapon toward an observation tower at UNIFIL’s headquarters in Naqoura, directly hitting it and causing them to fall. The injuries are fortunately, this time, not serious, but they remain in hospital.

IDF soldiers also fired on UN position (UNP) 1-31 in Labbouneh, hitting the entrance to the bunker where peacekeepers were sheltering, and damaging vehicles and a communications system. An IDF drone was observed flying inside the UN position up to the bunker entrance.

Yesterday, IDF soldiers deliberately fired at and disabled the position’s perimeter-monitoring cameras. They also deliberately fired on UNP 1-32A in Ras Naqoura, where regular Tripartite meetings were held before the conflict began, damaging lighting and a relay station.

Israel has been pressuring UNIFIL to move away from the Blue Line for over a week now. UNIFIL has been patrolling the U.N.-monitored "Blue Line" separating Lebanon and Israel and the disputed territory in between since 2006 under U.N. resolution 1701. Within the last week, UNIFIL has rejected requests to leave. Meanwhile, Irish blue hats in a nearby outpost have been apparently threatened with evacuation, according to Irish President Michael Higgins, but as of today say they are digging in despite the "close proximity" of IDF troops.

UNIFIL said in its statement that "any deliberate attack on peacekeepers is a grave violation of international humanitarian law and of Security Council resolution 1701."

One shouldn't expect an apology anytime soon. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the United Nations a "swamp of anti-semitic bile" in his General Assembly speech last month. Furthermore, the Israeli military has shown no concern for red lines when it comes to distinguishing between enemy and civilian, killing a record number of healthcare and aid workers, and journalists in the last year. Its expanded operations into Lebanon this month have been illuminating in this regard. In one three-day period alone, 40 firefighters, paramedics, and health care workers were killed in Israeli airstrikes, according to the Lebanese health ministry.

Violence against U.N. peacekeepers is rare, with spikes in these events lately occurring amid the turmoil in places like Mali and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Israel is not listening to the U.N., that is clear. The United States is the only voice it may listen to regarding red lines, like not declaring war on international peacekeepers that you agreed should be there, unmolested, for the better part of the last 20 years (though Israel will say it is UNIFIL's fault Hezbollah has continued to arm up, a violation of 1701, that doesn't give them the right to fire tank mortars at them).

Unfortunately the Biden administration has yet to intercede on this front. There is no State Department briefing today but we will update if and when the White House has anything to say on the matter.



UNIFIL peacekeeper Laura Rozzoni preparing for a patrol along the Blue Line in south Lebanon. (UN pic)


UNIFIL peacekeeper Laura Rozzoni preparing for a patrol along the Blue Line in south Lebanon. (UN pic)

Analysis | QiOSK
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.