Follow us on social

google cta
Netanyahu to UN: Get your peacekeepers out of Lebanon

Netanyahu to UN: Get your peacekeepers out of Lebanon

The Israel PM said Sunday they should evacuate if they don't want to get hurt

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

UPDATE 10/13: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel regretted the “harm done” to UNIFIL peacekeepers this week in Southern Lebanon but if the United Nations doesn't want further injuries to its forces then it needs to “remove them from the danger zone.”


UPDATE 10/12: A fifth UN peacekeeper has been injured in the village of Naquora in Southern Lebanon. According to UNIFIL the peacekeeper was undergoing surgery from a bullet wound on Saturday but would not confirm how he became to be shot. UNIFIL also said its buildings at a position in the village of Ramyah sustained "significant damage due to explosions from nearby shelling" on Friday. Also Friday, two Sri Lankan men serving as peacekeepers were also injured in Naquora. The IDF acknowledged that its troops were responsible and would be investigated "at the highest levels".



According to reports, Indonesian citizens serving as peacekeepers under the UNIFIL (United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon) were injured when the Israeli military fired on their headquarters Thursday.

This is the third incident in two days. From UNIFIL today:

This morning, two peacekeepers were injured after an IDF Merkava tank fired its weapon toward an observation tower at UNIFIL’s headquarters in Naqoura, directly hitting it and causing them to fall. The injuries are fortunately, this time, not serious, but they remain in hospital.

IDF soldiers also fired on UN position (UNP) 1-31 in Labbouneh, hitting the entrance to the bunker where peacekeepers were sheltering, and damaging vehicles and a communications system. An IDF drone was observed flying inside the UN position up to the bunker entrance.

Yesterday, IDF soldiers deliberately fired at and disabled the position’s perimeter-monitoring cameras. They also deliberately fired on UNP 1-32A in Ras Naqoura, where regular Tripartite meetings were held before the conflict began, damaging lighting and a relay station.

Israel has been pressuring UNIFIL to move away from the Blue Line for over a week now. UNIFIL has been patrolling the U.N.-monitored "Blue Line" separating Lebanon and Israel and the disputed territory in between since 2006 under U.N. resolution 1701. Within the last week, UNIFIL has rejected requests to leave. Meanwhile, Irish blue hats in a nearby outpost have been apparently threatened with evacuation, according to Irish President Michael Higgins, but as of today say they are digging in despite the "close proximity" of IDF troops.

UNIFIL said in its statement that "any deliberate attack on peacekeepers is a grave violation of international humanitarian law and of Security Council resolution 1701."

One shouldn't expect an apology anytime soon. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the United Nations a "swamp of anti-semitic bile" in his General Assembly speech last month. Furthermore, the Israeli military has shown no concern for red lines when it comes to distinguishing between enemy and civilian, killing a record number of healthcare and aid workers, and journalists in the last year. Its expanded operations into Lebanon this month have been illuminating in this regard. In one three-day period alone, 40 firefighters, paramedics, and health care workers were killed in Israeli airstrikes, according to the Lebanese health ministry.

Violence against U.N. peacekeepers is rare, with spikes in these events lately occurring amid the turmoil in places like Mali and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Israel is not listening to the U.N., that is clear. The United States is the only voice it may listen to regarding red lines, like not declaring war on international peacekeepers that you agreed should be there, unmolested, for the better part of the last 20 years (though Israel will say it is UNIFIL's fault Hezbollah has continued to arm up, a violation of 1701, that doesn't give them the right to fire tank mortars at them).

Unfortunately the Biden administration has yet to intercede on this front. There is no State Department briefing today but we will update if and when the White House has anything to say on the matter.



UNIFIL peacekeeper Laura Rozzoni preparing for a patrol along the Blue Line in south Lebanon. (UN pic)


UNIFIL peacekeeper Laura Rozzoni preparing for a patrol along the Blue Line in south Lebanon. (UN pic)

google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.