Follow us on social

google cta
Netanyahu to UN: Get your peacekeepers out of Lebanon

Netanyahu to UN: Get your peacekeepers out of Lebanon

The Israel PM said Sunday they should evacuate if they don't want to get hurt

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

UPDATE 10/13: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel regretted the “harm done” to UNIFIL peacekeepers this week in Southern Lebanon but if the United Nations doesn't want further injuries to its forces then it needs to “remove them from the danger zone.”


UPDATE 10/12: A fifth UN peacekeeper has been injured in the village of Naquora in Southern Lebanon. According to UNIFIL the peacekeeper was undergoing surgery from a bullet wound on Saturday but would not confirm how he became to be shot. UNIFIL also said its buildings at a position in the village of Ramyah sustained "significant damage due to explosions from nearby shelling" on Friday. Also Friday, two Sri Lankan men serving as peacekeepers were also injured in Naquora. The IDF acknowledged that its troops were responsible and would be investigated "at the highest levels".



According to reports, Indonesian citizens serving as peacekeepers under the UNIFIL (United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon) were injured when the Israeli military fired on their headquarters Thursday.

This is the third incident in two days. From UNIFIL today:

This morning, two peacekeepers were injured after an IDF Merkava tank fired its weapon toward an observation tower at UNIFIL’s headquarters in Naqoura, directly hitting it and causing them to fall. The injuries are fortunately, this time, not serious, but they remain in hospital.

IDF soldiers also fired on UN position (UNP) 1-31 in Labbouneh, hitting the entrance to the bunker where peacekeepers were sheltering, and damaging vehicles and a communications system. An IDF drone was observed flying inside the UN position up to the bunker entrance.

Yesterday, IDF soldiers deliberately fired at and disabled the position’s perimeter-monitoring cameras. They also deliberately fired on UNP 1-32A in Ras Naqoura, where regular Tripartite meetings were held before the conflict began, damaging lighting and a relay station.

Israel has been pressuring UNIFIL to move away from the Blue Line for over a week now. UNIFIL has been patrolling the U.N.-monitored "Blue Line" separating Lebanon and Israel and the disputed territory in between since 2006 under U.N. resolution 1701. Within the last week, UNIFIL has rejected requests to leave. Meanwhile, Irish blue hats in a nearby outpost have been apparently threatened with evacuation, according to Irish President Michael Higgins, but as of today say they are digging in despite the "close proximity" of IDF troops.

UNIFIL said in its statement that "any deliberate attack on peacekeepers is a grave violation of international humanitarian law and of Security Council resolution 1701."

One shouldn't expect an apology anytime soon. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the United Nations a "swamp of anti-semitic bile" in his General Assembly speech last month. Furthermore, the Israeli military has shown no concern for red lines when it comes to distinguishing between enemy and civilian, killing a record number of healthcare and aid workers, and journalists in the last year. Its expanded operations into Lebanon this month have been illuminating in this regard. In one three-day period alone, 40 firefighters, paramedics, and health care workers were killed in Israeli airstrikes, according to the Lebanese health ministry.

Violence against U.N. peacekeepers is rare, with spikes in these events lately occurring amid the turmoil in places like Mali and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Israel is not listening to the U.N., that is clear. The United States is the only voice it may listen to regarding red lines, like not declaring war on international peacekeepers that you agreed should be there, unmolested, for the better part of the last 20 years (though Israel will say it is UNIFIL's fault Hezbollah has continued to arm up, a violation of 1701, that doesn't give them the right to fire tank mortars at them).

Unfortunately the Biden administration has yet to intercede on this front. There is no State Department briefing today but we will update if and when the White House has anything to say on the matter.



UNIFIL peacekeeper Laura Rozzoni preparing for a patrol along the Blue Line in south Lebanon. (UN pic)


UNIFIL peacekeeper Laura Rozzoni preparing for a patrol along the Blue Line in south Lebanon. (UN pic)

google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.