Follow us on social

google cta
SpaceX, DoD want to send soldiers on spaceships for rapid response missions

SpaceX, DoD want to send soldiers on spaceships for rapid response missions

Elon Musk's space enterprise wants to transport U.S. troops to any point on Earth in less than an hour. But its sci-fi pitch doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

Imagine a group of gunmen are surrounding a U.S. embassy in a far-off country. The attackers are minutes from breaking through the building's walls, and they don't have good intentions.

Suddenly, a loud noise breaks through the shouts and gunshots coming from outside and the desperate calls for help coming from inside. A rocket lands in a nearby field, and American special forces pour out of the hatch. The soldiers quickly push back the militants and secure the embassy, saving our diplomats from likely doom.

This scenario may sound a little far-fetched. But, according to a 2021 report obtained by The Intercept, it's something that the Pentagon really wants to try. The document came out of a partnership between the Department of Defense and SpaceX, an Elon Musk company that aims to commercialize space travel and shipping. The embassy-saving example is perhaps the most striking of the "use cases" laid out in the report — and the least likely to work in practice.

"If a mob’s attacking an embassy and they dial up their handy SpaceX spaceship, it’s still going to take a while to get there," Bill Hartung of the Quincy Institute told The Intercept. "It’s almost like someone thinks it would be really neat to do stuff through space but haven’t thought through the practical ramifications."

Kaitlyn Johnson of the Center for Strategic and International Studies also had her doubts. "If it’s in a city, it’s not like they can land [a] Starship next to the embassy," Johnson told The Intercept.

The proposal, which DoD says is "explorative in nature" but could become a reality within 10 years, risks being the latest in a long string of botched attempts to bring sci-fi ideas to life. If it follows the path of President Ronald Reagan's "Star Wars" initiative, it could end up being a massive waste of money. And if it follows the path of the V-22 Osprey — a Marine aircraft that can take off like a helicopter and fly like a plane — it could have deadly consequences.

The report suggests two other potential uses for SpaceX rockets that are less over-the-top, though experts say neither has a great chance of bearing fruit. First, the rockets could quickly deliver supplies to troops in the Pacific in case of a conflict in the region. Second, Musk's starships could deliver "deployable air base systems" that would allow the military to rapidly set up temporary air bases anywhere in the world.

Even if the military is somehow able to make these ideas a reality, a major question remains: How will the U.S. stop other countries from doing the same, leading to an arms race in space? On this point, the report gives no answer.


(shutterstock/delcarmat)|Editorial credit: Sundry Photography
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
US foreign policy
Top photo credit: A political cartoon portrays the disagreement between President William McKinley and Joseph Pulitzer, who worried the U.S. was growing too large through foreign conquests and land acquisitions. (Puck magazine/Creative Commons)

What does US ‘national interest’ really mean?

Washington Politics

In foreign policy discourse, the phrase “the national interest” gets used with an almost ubiquitous frequency, which could lead one to assume it is a strongly defined and absolute term.

Most debates, particularly around changing course in diplomatic strategy or advocating for or against some kind of economic or military intervention, invoke the phrase as justification for their recommended path forward.

keep readingShow less
V-22 Osprey
Top Image Credit: VanderWolf Images/ Shutterstock
Osprey crash in Japan kills at least 1 US soldier

Military aircraft accidents are spiking

Military Industrial Complex

Military aviation accidents are spiking, driven by a perfect storm of flawed aircraft, inadequate pilot training, and over-involvement abroad.

As Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D- Mass.) office reported this week, the rate of severe accidents per 100,000 flight hours, was a staggering 55% higher than it was in 2020. Her office said mishaps cost the military $9.4 billion, killed 90 service members and DoD civilian employees, and destroyed 89 aircraft between 2020 to 2024. The Air Force lost 47 airmen to “preventable mishaps” in 2024 alone.

The U.S. continues to utilize aircraft with known safety issues or are otherwise prone to accidents, like the V-22 Osprey, whose gearbox and clutch failures can cause crashes. It is currently part of the ongoing military buildup near Venezuela.

Other mishap-prone aircraft include the Apache Helicopter (AH-64), which saw 4.5 times more accidents in 2024 than 2020, and the C-130 military transport aircraft, whose accident rate doubled in that same period. The MH-53E Sea Dragon helicopter was susceptible to crashes throughout its decades-long deployment, but was kept operational until early 2025.

Dan Grazier, director of the Stimson Center’s National Security Reform Program, told RS that the lack of flight crew experience is a problem. “The total number of flight hours U.S. military pilots receive has been abysmal for years. Pilots in all branches simply don't fly often enough to even maintain their flying skills, to say nothing of improving them,” he said.

To Grazier’s point, army pilots fly less these days: a September 2024 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report found that the average manned aircraft crew flew 198 flight hours in 2023, down from 302 hours flown in 2011.

keep readingShow less
Majorie Taylor Greene
Top photo credit" Majorie Taylor Greene (Shutterstock/Consolidated News Service)

Marjorie Taylor Greene to resign: 'I refuse to be a battered wife'

Washington Politics

Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia’s 14th district, who at one time was arguably the politician most associated with Donald Trump’s “MAGA” movement outside of the president himself, announced in a lengthy video Friday night that she would be retiring from Congress, with her last day being January 5.

Greene was an outspoken advocate for releasing the Epstein Files, which the Trump administration vehemently opposed until a quick reversal last week which led to the House and Senate quickly passing bills for the release which the president signed.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.