Follow us on social

google cta
China Sandy Cay

China, Philippines both plant flag on reef, escalating Maritime tussle

Washington will need to nuance its response as it gets drawn in as Manila’s treaty ally

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The Philippines-China maritime tussle just edged up a notch this past week, with Chinese television reporting a Chinese flag-planting operation in a tiny cluster of sand banks in the South China Sea known as Sandy Cay.

Chinese personnel left after their operation, which apparently took place earlier in the month. The Philippines responded in kind soon after the announcement, with a combined team of its navy, coast guard, and police mirroring the Chinese action. The incidents took place in the backdrop of the major U.S.-Philippine annual exercise Balikatan, which began on April 21.

The situation in the South China Sea has been deteriorating since late 2023, when clashes between Manila and Beijing escalated dramatically. A limited agreement in July 2024 on the most dangerous flashpoint, the Second Thomas Shoal, has held up until now. Manila has been running resupply missions without incident to the tiny contingent of Philippine troops perched there since then. But as we predicted in August 2024, clashes have indeed spread to new geographies, keeping the overall tensions high.

Manila, which has named the West Philippine Sea its EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone) as, might worry that Beijing’s show-of-sovereignty operation is designed to eventually occupy it and build military structures, similar to what China did at nearby Subi Reef about a decade ago.

But the operation was likely not just about possession of the reef — but about pushing the question of maritime rights and jurisdiction over the surrounding waters. In 2016, an international tribunal ruled these waters as being indisputably a part of the Philippine EEZ. But Sandy Cay, referenced as a high-tide feature in the ruling, is likely entitled to a territorial sea of 12 nautical miles, overlapping with Chinese-militarized Subi Reef. (The tribunal explicitly refused to rule over the sovereignty of Sandy Cay and determined Subi Reef to be a low-tide elevation generating neither a sovereignty claim nor its own territorial sea or EEZ.)

Sandy Cay is also very close to Thitu island where Manila maintains a military base. Thitu is also the only Philippine-controlled island with a permanent civilian population.

Chinese maritime coercion and illegal intrusions are increasingly of concern, not just to the Philippines, but also to wider Southeast Asia. The United States has been getting more involved in the imbroglio, deepening its commitment to its treaty ally, the Philippines, including with new U.S. military sites on the Philippine mainland.

If the current simmer boils over, U.S. troops could be exposed to risks over tiny features in the ocean that are arguably not a U.S. vital interest. A nuanced approach will be required of the alliance to both deter Chinese behavior and avoid stumbling into armed conflict at the same time.


Top photo credit: You Tube /Taiwan Plus News
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Ilham Aliyev azerbaijan iran
Top photo credit: Azerbaijan president Ilham Aliyev visited Embassy of Islamic Republic of Iran, offered condolences over death of former President Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, in 2017. (Office of the President of Azerbaijan/public domain)

Neocons wanted an Azeri uprising against Iran. They didn't get it.

Middle East

With Iran resisting the U.S./Israeli onslaught for the second week, what was supposed to be a quick transition to a pro-U.S. regime following the decapitation strike that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is fast turning into a quagmire. While the U.S. and Israel continue to sow mayhem on Tehran from the skies, the previously unthinkable option of sending ground troops to Iran is gaining ground.

First, an apparent plan was being hatched to employ Kurdish fighters to take on Tehran. Then, when drones, allegedly flying from Iran although Tehran denied it, struck the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic of Azerbaijan — hitting an airport terminal and a village school, and wounding four civilians — the stage appeared set for the opening of a northern front against Iran. Here was an alleged act of aggression from Iranian territory against Israel's closest partner in the South Caucasus. It offered the pretext to goad Azerbaijan into joining the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran.

keep readingShow less
Trump miami press conference iran
Top photo credit: Trump press conference on Iran, Miami, 3/9/26 (PBS screengrab)

Trump press conference reveals a man who wants out of war

QiOSK

Trump’s “all over the place” press conference at his Miami resort on Monday appears to have had two key objectives: a) Calm the markets by signalling the conflict may soon be over because it has been so "successful,” and b) Prepare the ground for Trump ending the war through a unilateral declaration of victory.

Though ending a war that never should have been started in the first place — rather than fighting it endlessly in the pursuit of an illusory victory as the U.S. did in Afghanistan — is the right move, it won’t be as easy as Trump appears to think.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.