Follow us on social

China Sandy Cay

China, Philippines both plant flag on reef, escalating Maritime tussle

Washington will need to nuance its response as it gets drawn in as Manila’s treaty ally

Analysis | QiOSK

The Philippines-China maritime tussle just edged up a notch this past week, with Chinese television reporting a Chinese flag-planting operation in a tiny cluster of sand banks in the South China Sea known as Sandy Cay.

Chinese personnel left after their operation, which apparently took place earlier in the month. The Philippines responded in kind soon after the announcement, with a combined team of its navy, coast guard, and police mirroring the Chinese action. The incidents took place in the backdrop of the major U.S.-Philippine annual exercise Balikatan, which began on April 21.

The situation in the South China Sea has been deteriorating since late 2023, when clashes between Manila and Beijing escalated dramatically. A limited agreement in July 2024 on the most dangerous flashpoint, the Second Thomas Shoal, has held up until now. Manila has been running resupply missions without incident to the tiny contingent of Philippine troops perched there since then. But as we predicted in August 2024, clashes have indeed spread to new geographies, keeping the overall tensions high.

Manila, which has named the West Philippine Sea its EEZ (Exclusive Economic Zone) as, might worry that Beijing’s show-of-sovereignty operation is designed to eventually occupy it and build military structures, similar to what China did at nearby Subi Reef about a decade ago.

But the operation was likely not just about possession of the reef — but about pushing the question of maritime rights and jurisdiction over the surrounding waters. In 2016, an international tribunal ruled these waters as being indisputably a part of the Philippine EEZ. But Sandy Cay, referenced as a high-tide feature in the ruling, is likely entitled to a territorial sea of 12 nautical miles, overlapping with Chinese-militarized Subi Reef. (The tribunal explicitly refused to rule over the sovereignty of Sandy Cay and determined Subi Reef to be a low-tide elevation generating neither a sovereignty claim nor its own territorial sea or EEZ.)

Sandy Cay is also very close to Thitu island where Manila maintains a military base. Thitu is also the only Philippine-controlled island with a permanent civilian population.

Chinese maritime coercion and illegal intrusions are increasingly of concern, not just to the Philippines, but also to wider Southeast Asia. The United States has been getting more involved in the imbroglio, deepening its commitment to its treaty ally, the Philippines, including with new U.S. military sites on the Philippine mainland.

If the current simmer boils over, U.S. troops could be exposed to risks over tiny features in the ocean that are arguably not a U.S. vital interest. A nuanced approach will be required of the alliance to both deter Chinese behavior and avoid stumbling into armed conflict at the same time.


Top photo credit: You Tube /Taiwan Plus News
Analysis | QiOSK
Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare
Top photo credit: Seth Harp book jacket (Viking press) US special operators/deviant art/creative commons

Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare

Media

In 2020 and 2021, 109 U.S. soldiers died at Fort Bragg, the largest military base in the country and the central location for the key Special Operations Units in the American military.

Only four of them were on overseas deployments. The others died stateside, mostly of drug overdoses, violence, or suicide. The situation has hardly improved. It was recently revealed that another 51 soldiers died at Fort Bragg in 2023. According to U.S. government data, these represent more military fatalities than have occurred at the hands of enemy forces in any year since 2013.

keep readingShow less
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

The case for US Middle East retrenchment has never been clearer

Middle East

Is Israel becoming the new hegemon of the Middle East? The answer to this question is an important one.

Preventing the rise of a rival regional hegemon — a state with a preponderance of military and economic power — in Eurasia has long been a core goal of U.S. foreign policy. During the Cold War, Washington feared Soviet dominion over Europe. Today, U.S. policymakers worry that China’s increasingly capable military will crowd the United States out of Asia’s lucrative economic markets. The United States has also acted repeatedly to prevent close allies in Europe and Asia from becoming military competitors, using promises of U.S. military protection to keep them weak and dependent.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Top image credit: lev radin / Shutterstock.com

Do we need a treaty on neutrality?

Global Crises

In an era of widespread use of economic sanctions, dual-use technology exports, and hybrid warfare, the boundary between peacetime and wartime has become increasingly blurry. Yet understandings of neutrality remain stuck in the time of trench warfare. An updated conception of neutrality, codified through an international treaty, is necessary for global security.

Neutrality in the 21st century is often whatever a country wants it to be. For some, such as the European neutrals like Switzerland and Ireland, it is compatible with non-U.N. sanctions (such as by the European Union) while for others it is not. Countries in the Global South are also more likely to take a case-by-case approach, such as choosing to not take a stance on a specific conflict and instead call for a peaceful resolution while others believe a moral position does not undermine neutrality.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.