Follow us on social

google cta
Screenshot-2023-05-11-at-6.34.35-am

Trump tells CNN town hall: 'I want everyone to stop dying' in Ukraine

The Republican-friendly audience applauded when he said he 'would talk' to Putin and Zelenksy and end the war 'in 24 hours'

Analysis | Europe
google cta
google cta

Former President Donald Trump, who is running to win his seat back from current President Joe Biden, told a friendly audience of Republican voters last night that Russian president Vladimir Putin "made a tremendous mistake" by invading Ukraine last year.

When asked who he thought would win the current war, he told his interviewer, CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins, “I want everybody to stop dying. They’re dying. Russians and Ukrainians. I want them to stop dying. And I’ll have that done in 24 hours.”

When asked how he would stop the war in 24 hours he said "I'll meet with Putin, I'll meet with Zelensky, they both have strengths and they both have weaknesses and in 24 hours it will be done."

Pressing him, Collins asked repeatedly, "But you won't say you want Ukraine to win this war?" Trump ignored the question, saying "I want Europe to put up more money."

Perhaps not surprisingly, the audience, which on a range of subjects, including his unapologetic responses to questions about January 6 and his recent sexual abuse conviction in civil court, applauded the president during this exchange. In poll after poll, Republicans have diverged from Democrats on this issue, including this most recent Pew survey on U.S. support for Ukraine, which found that less than half of Republicans trust Ukrainian President Zelensky to "to the right thing" on foreign affairs, and 70 percent saying Washington should focus instead on what is happening here at home.

If last night was any indication, Trump, who is the only declared Republican candidate for 2024 to come out forcefully against the current U.S. policy in Ukraine, plans to pursue that line, and it is resonating with rank and file Republicans — at least his base, which political analysts say is still formidable despite Trump's legal troubles and past performance as president. The other GOP contenders have displayed a conventionally hawkish view on the Ukraine, even criticizing Biden for not doing more, which Trump has suggested might actually lead to nuclear war.

Trump's notion of ending the war "in 24 hours" is certain to draw guffaws, even if his desire to end the war through "talking" is in the right place.

"It is highly unlikely that Trump will, as he claims, be able to end the war in Ukraine 'in 24 hours,'" noted my Quincy Institute colleague George Beebe.

"At this stage, simply getting Ukraine and Russia to the negotiating table will likely require extensive, tough-minded multilateral diplomacy coordinated between Washington, NATO partners, and perhaps even Beijing."  

When Trump was asked whether he supported sending more weapons and aid to Ukraine (Washington has already allocated over $113 billion, and of that, has now sent nearly $37 billion in weapons as of this week), he said, “we’re giving away so much equipment, we don’t have ammunition for ourselves right now. We don’t have ammunition for ourselves we’re giving away so much.”

When Collins pressed him to say whether Putin is a war criminal (the International Criminal Court has issued warrants for his arrest), Trump said:

"If you say he’s a war criminal it’s going to be a lot tougher to make a deal to make this thing stopped. If he’s going to be a war criminal, people are going to grab him and execute him, he’s going to fight a lot harder than he’s fighting under the other circumstance.”

Trump called Putin “a smart guy,” but said the Russian leader “made a tremendous mistake.”

“Of course he’s smart. They want you to say he’s a stupid person. He’s not a stupid person and he’s very cunning. Putin made a bad mistake in my opinion.”

“His mistake was going in. He would have never gone in if I was president.”


CNN Town Hall with Donald Trump (May 19, 2023) CNN Screenshot.
google cta
Analysis | Europe
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.