Follow us on social

google cta
Vietnam tariffs trade

Vietnam's fortunes actually take a dramatic turn, and not for worst

For the US, maintaining robust relations with Hanoi are paramount for maintaining influence in the South China Sea

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

Vietnam’s trade fortunes have taken a dramatic turn.

Once slapped with a staggering 46% tariff in President Donald Trump’s initial “Liberation Day” trade offensive, the Southeast Asian nation now finds itself in a much better spot — benefiting from a reduced 10% tariff rate, in line with most other countries. It’s a striking reversal that highlights Hanoi’s stepped-up diplomatic hustle on the global stage.

Vietnam made a significant diplomatic stride recently by dispatching a high-level delegation to Washington, D.C., with the strategic goal of addressing trade imbalances and strengthening economic ties with the United States. In a move that underscored Hanoi's sense of urgency and determination, the Vietnamese government wasted no time in mobilizing its top talent, led by Deputy Prime Minister Ho Duc Phoc, signaling just how seriously the Vietnamese leadership views the issue of trade relations with the U.S.

Deputy Prime Minister Phoc’s visit was carefully orchestrated to engage with key figures in Washington's political and economic spheres. Among the high-profile meetings on the itinerary was a crucial dialogue with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Their Friday discussions reportedly centered on narrowing the trade gap between the two nations and pledges by Vietnam to tackle origin of goods fraud (China has been accused to shipping its products to be sold via countries like Vietnam to avoid tariffs). These and more fair and reciprocal trade practices that would benefit both economies were also reportedly discussed.

One of Trump's priorities has been to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. Textiles have all but moved overseas completely in the last 20 years resulting in the massive trade gap with Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam. Currently the U.S.trade deficit with Hanoi is $123.5 billion.

In anticipation of "Liberation Day" Hanoi cut its own tariffs on several U.S. products including LNG and cars, and also approved Starlink services, and pledged to bring in more imports from the U.S.

During the official visit last week, in addition to engaging with select members of former President Trump’s cabinet, the Vietnamese delegation also sought to strengthen ties within the U.S. legislative branch by meeting with key members of Congress. Notably, they held discussions with Republican Senators Bill Hagerty of Tennessee and Steve Daines of Montana, both of whom have demonstrated a strong interest in Asian economic affairs and the stability of global supply chains.

These meetings provided Vietnam with an opportunity to broaden its support base on Capitol Hill and reinforce bipartisan interest in deepening economic cooperation. By engaging lawmakers with strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific, Vietnam is positioning itself as a reliable partner in efforts to diversify supply chains and promote regional stability — an increasingly important priority amid shifting global dynamics.

The diplomatic charm offensive extended beyond just official meetings. The Vietnamese team engaged with think tanks, trade groups, and other stakeholders throughout the Capital Beltway, aiming to strengthen long-term partnerships and build goodwill. The delegation's proactive approach, clear messaging, and high-level representation were widely seen as a diplomatic win for Hanoi.

The stakes are high for Vietnam since they have the third-largest trade surplus with the U.S. after China and Mexico and export more than $100 billion in goods to the U.S. annually, including Nike shoes.

After all, the original punitive tariff imposed by Washington on Vietnam had threatened to strain ties between the two nations at a critical moment — just as they mark 50 years since the fall of Saigon on April 30. As strategic comprehensive partners, the U.S. and Vietnam have built a relationship centered on economic cooperation, regional stability, and shared security interests in the Indo-Pacific.

“As we near the 50th anniversary of Saigon’s fall, the U.S.-Vietnam relationship rests on pragmatism more than sentiment. Vietnam’s youth — over half its population is under 35 — barely recall the war. They’re focused on iPhones, K-pop, and global brands flooding Hanoi’s malls,” claims Alison Huynh, a Silicon Valley investor and host of the Vietnam Summit at Mar-a-Lago, dedicated to fostering U.S.-Vietnam economic ties.

Under the leadership of Communist Party Secretary-General Tô Lâm, Vietnam is charting an ambitious course toward a more advanced economic future. The country has set its sights on becoming an upper-income, knowledge-based, and tech-driven economy by 2045. To achieve this transformation, Hanoi is aiming for annual growth rates approaching 8%, backed by major investments in education, innovation, and digital infrastructure.

This strategic shift comes at a time when Vietnam’s global trade position is gaining new momentum. For American consumers, especially in the post-NCAA championship shopping rush for Nike and Adidas gear (much of it made in Vietnam), the lower tariffs mean more competitive prices. But for Vietnam, it’s more than a short-term win: it’s a signal that the country is ready to play a bigger role in the global economy, not just as a manufacturing hub, but as a rising player in tech and innovation.

Over the past few decades, the U.S. and Vietnam have worked steadily to rebuild and strengthen their relationship, culminating in a formal upgrade to a “comprehensive strategic partnership.” This partnership has been grounded in robust economic cooperation, mutual interests in maintaining regional stability, and shared security concerns across the Indo-Pacific.

However, the sudden imposition of a steep tariff risked more than just short-term economic pain. It threatened to disrupt key supply chains, rattle investor confidence, and weaken diplomatic trust — potentially nudging Vietnam closer to alternative economic alliances, including with China or regional blocs less aligned with U.S. strategic goals.

The recent decision by Washington to reduce and pause tariffs on Vietnam could also play a strategic role in managing tensions in the South China Sea. This move is more than an economic gesture — it signals a broader geopolitical alignment. As territorial disputes and regional rivalries escalate in the Indo-Pacific, particularly with China's growing assertiveness in the South China Sea, Washington’s approach to Vietnam reflects an effort to solidify alliances and partnerships in the region. By easing economic pressures, the United States is extending a hand to a key Southeast Asian partner, potentially bolstering Vietnam's economic resilience and encouraging closer diplomatic cooperation.

In an era marked by intensifying great power competition, maintaining relations with Vietnam is not only beneficial for trade but also pivotal for sustaining U.S. influence in the region. Vietnam occupies a strategic position both geographically and politically, sharing maritime boundaries with several contested zones in the South China Sea. Strengthening economic ties through tariff relief could deepen trust and pave the way for greater collaboration on security and regional stability. In this context, economic diplomacy becomes a tool for geopolitical strategy, helping to counterbalance China’s dominance and reaffirm the U.S. commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

From Vietnam's side of the court, by capitalizing on favorable trade conditions and embracing forward-looking reforms, Tô Lâm's team is positioning itself to not only maintain momentum, but also redefine its economic identity on the global stage. While the reduced tariffs may be a temporary advantage, if Vietnam sticks to its game plan, the rewards could be lasting.


Top photo credit: People walk past a gate of the Samsung Electro-Mechanics factory, following U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of a tariff rate of 46 per cent on Vietnam — later paused — in Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam, April 9, 2025. REUTERS/Thinh Nguyen
google cta
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi 首相官邸 (Cabinet Public Affairs Office)

Takaichi 101: How to torpedo relations with China in a month

Asia-Pacific

On November 7, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could undoubtedly be “a situation that threatens Japan’s survival,” thereby implying that Tokyo could respond by dispatching Self-Defense Forces.

This statement triggered the worst crisis in Sino-Japanese relations in over a decade because it reflected a transformation in Japan’s security policy discourse, defense posture, and U.S.-Japan defense cooperation in recent years. Understanding this transformation requires dissecting the context as well as content of Takaichi’s parliamentary remarks.

keep readingShow less
Starmer, Macron, Merz G7
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and António Costa, President of the European Council at the G7 world leaders summit in Kananaskis, June 15, 2025. Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

The Europeans pushing the NATO poison pill

Europe

The recent flurry of diplomatic activity surrounding Ukraine has revealed a stark transatlantic divide. While high level American and Ukrainian officials have been negotiating the U.S. peace plan in Geneva, European powers have been scrambling to influence a process from which they risk being sidelined.

While Europe has to be eventually involved in a settlement of the biggest war on its territory after World War II, so far it’s been acting more like a spoiler than a constructive player.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig
Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Saudi leans in hard to get UAE out of Sudan civil war

Middle East

As Saudi Arabia’s powerful crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), swept through Washington last week, the agenda was predictably packed with deals: a trillion-dollar investment pledge, access to advanced F-35 fighter jets, and coveted American AI technology dominated the headlines. Yet tucked within these transactions was a significant development for the civil war in Sudan.

Speaking at the U.S.-Saudi Investment Forum President Donald Trump said that Sudan “was not on my charts,” viewing the conflict as “just something that was crazy and out of control” until the Saudi leader pressed the issue. “His majesty would like me to do something very powerful having to do with Sudan,” Trump recounted, adding that MBS framed it as an opportunity for greatness.

The crown prince’s intervention highlights a crucial new reality that the path to peace, or continued war, in Sudan now runs even more directly through the escalating rivalry between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The fate of Sudan is being forged in the Gulf, and its future will be decided by which side has more sway in Trump’s White House.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.