Follow us on social

google cta
Vietnam tariffs trade

Vietnam's fortunes actually take a dramatic turn, and not for worst

For the US, maintaining robust relations with Hanoi are paramount for maintaining influence in the South China Sea

Analysis | Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

Vietnam’s trade fortunes have taken a dramatic turn.

Once slapped with a staggering 46% tariff in President Donald Trump’s initial “Liberation Day” trade offensive, the Southeast Asian nation now finds itself in a much better spot — benefiting from a reduced 10% tariff rate, in line with most other countries. It’s a striking reversal that highlights Hanoi’s stepped-up diplomatic hustle on the global stage.

Vietnam made a significant diplomatic stride recently by dispatching a high-level delegation to Washington, D.C., with the strategic goal of addressing trade imbalances and strengthening economic ties with the United States. In a move that underscored Hanoi's sense of urgency and determination, the Vietnamese government wasted no time in mobilizing its top talent, led by Deputy Prime Minister Ho Duc Phoc, signaling just how seriously the Vietnamese leadership views the issue of trade relations with the U.S.

Deputy Prime Minister Phoc’s visit was carefully orchestrated to engage with key figures in Washington's political and economic spheres. Among the high-profile meetings on the itinerary was a crucial dialogue with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Their Friday discussions reportedly centered on narrowing the trade gap between the two nations and pledges by Vietnam to tackle origin of goods fraud (China has been accused to shipping its products to be sold via countries like Vietnam to avoid tariffs). These and more fair and reciprocal trade practices that would benefit both economies were also reportedly discussed.

One of Trump's priorities has been to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. Textiles have all but moved overseas completely in the last 20 years resulting in the massive trade gap with Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam. Currently the U.S.trade deficit with Hanoi is $123.5 billion.

In anticipation of "Liberation Day" Hanoi cut its own tariffs on several U.S. products including LNG and cars, and also approved Starlink services, and pledged to bring in more imports from the U.S.

During the official visit last week, in addition to engaging with select members of former President Trump’s cabinet, the Vietnamese delegation also sought to strengthen ties within the U.S. legislative branch by meeting with key members of Congress. Notably, they held discussions with Republican Senators Bill Hagerty of Tennessee and Steve Daines of Montana, both of whom have demonstrated a strong interest in Asian economic affairs and the stability of global supply chains.

These meetings provided Vietnam with an opportunity to broaden its support base on Capitol Hill and reinforce bipartisan interest in deepening economic cooperation. By engaging lawmakers with strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific, Vietnam is positioning itself as a reliable partner in efforts to diversify supply chains and promote regional stability — an increasingly important priority amid shifting global dynamics.

The diplomatic charm offensive extended beyond just official meetings. The Vietnamese team engaged with think tanks, trade groups, and other stakeholders throughout the Capital Beltway, aiming to strengthen long-term partnerships and build goodwill. The delegation's proactive approach, clear messaging, and high-level representation were widely seen as a diplomatic win for Hanoi.

The stakes are high for Vietnam since they have the third-largest trade surplus with the U.S. after China and Mexico and export more than $100 billion in goods to the U.S. annually, including Nike shoes.

After all, the original punitive tariff imposed by Washington on Vietnam had threatened to strain ties between the two nations at a critical moment — just as they mark 50 years since the fall of Saigon on April 30. As strategic comprehensive partners, the U.S. and Vietnam have built a relationship centered on economic cooperation, regional stability, and shared security interests in the Indo-Pacific.

“As we near the 50th anniversary of Saigon’s fall, the U.S.-Vietnam relationship rests on pragmatism more than sentiment. Vietnam’s youth — over half its population is under 35 — barely recall the war. They’re focused on iPhones, K-pop, and global brands flooding Hanoi’s malls,” claims Alison Huynh, a Silicon Valley investor and host of the Vietnam Summit at Mar-a-Lago, dedicated to fostering U.S.-Vietnam economic ties.

Under the leadership of Communist Party Secretary-General Tô Lâm, Vietnam is charting an ambitious course toward a more advanced economic future. The country has set its sights on becoming an upper-income, knowledge-based, and tech-driven economy by 2045. To achieve this transformation, Hanoi is aiming for annual growth rates approaching 8%, backed by major investments in education, innovation, and digital infrastructure.

This strategic shift comes at a time when Vietnam’s global trade position is gaining new momentum. For American consumers, especially in the post-NCAA championship shopping rush for Nike and Adidas gear (much of it made in Vietnam), the lower tariffs mean more competitive prices. But for Vietnam, it’s more than a short-term win: it’s a signal that the country is ready to play a bigger role in the global economy, not just as a manufacturing hub, but as a rising player in tech and innovation.

Over the past few decades, the U.S. and Vietnam have worked steadily to rebuild and strengthen their relationship, culminating in a formal upgrade to a “comprehensive strategic partnership.” This partnership has been grounded in robust economic cooperation, mutual interests in maintaining regional stability, and shared security concerns across the Indo-Pacific.

However, the sudden imposition of a steep tariff risked more than just short-term economic pain. It threatened to disrupt key supply chains, rattle investor confidence, and weaken diplomatic trust — potentially nudging Vietnam closer to alternative economic alliances, including with China or regional blocs less aligned with U.S. strategic goals.

The recent decision by Washington to reduce and pause tariffs on Vietnam could also play a strategic role in managing tensions in the South China Sea. This move is more than an economic gesture — it signals a broader geopolitical alignment. As territorial disputes and regional rivalries escalate in the Indo-Pacific, particularly with China's growing assertiveness in the South China Sea, Washington’s approach to Vietnam reflects an effort to solidify alliances and partnerships in the region. By easing economic pressures, the United States is extending a hand to a key Southeast Asian partner, potentially bolstering Vietnam's economic resilience and encouraging closer diplomatic cooperation.

In an era marked by intensifying great power competition, maintaining relations with Vietnam is not only beneficial for trade but also pivotal for sustaining U.S. influence in the region. Vietnam occupies a strategic position both geographically and politically, sharing maritime boundaries with several contested zones in the South China Sea. Strengthening economic ties through tariff relief could deepen trust and pave the way for greater collaboration on security and regional stability. In this context, economic diplomacy becomes a tool for geopolitical strategy, helping to counterbalance China’s dominance and reaffirm the U.S. commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific.

From Vietnam's side of the court, by capitalizing on favorable trade conditions and embracing forward-looking reforms, Tô Lâm's team is positioning itself to not only maintain momentum, but also redefine its economic identity on the global stage. While the reduced tariffs may be a temporary advantage, if Vietnam sticks to its game plan, the rewards could be lasting.


Top photo credit: People walk past a gate of the Samsung Electro-Mechanics factory, following U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of a tariff rate of 46 per cent on Vietnam — later paused — in Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam, April 9, 2025. REUTERS/Thinh Nguyen
google cta
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
In new peace, US firms will help Israel spy on and target Gazans
Top Image Credit: U.S. and German military personnel stand in front of a monitor running Palantir software, at the Civil-Military Coordination Center in Kiryat Gat, southern Israel, on November 12, 2025. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Aiden Griffitts/Wikimedia Commons)

In new peace, US firms will help Israel spy on and target Gazans

Military Industrial Complex

Since mid-October, some 200 U.S. military personnel have been working out of a sprawling warehouse in southern Israel, around 20 kilometers from the northern tip of the Gaza Strip. The Civil-Military Coordination Center (CMCC) was ostensibly set up to facilitate the implementation of President Donald Trump’s 20-point “peace plan” — whose stated aims are to “disarm Hamas,” “rebuild Gaza,” and lay the groundwork for “Palestinian self-determination and statehood” — which last week received the endorsement of the UN Security Council.

Yet while no Palestinian bodies have been involved in the conversations surrounding Gaza’s future, at least two private U.S. surveillance firms have found their way into the White House’s post-war designs for the Strip.

keep readingShow less
US Palestine Peace Gaza
Top photo credit : Shutterstock

Congress, you have a chance to implement Trump Gaza plan right

Middle East

Weeks have passed since the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2803, endorsing a U.S.-backed plan that creates a “Board of Peace” to run Gaza for at least two years and authorizes a new International Stabilization Force (ISF) to secure the territory after a ceasefire.

Supporters call it a diplomatic breakthrough. For many Palestinians, it looks like something else: Oslo with helmets, heavy on security, light on rights, and controlled from outside.

keep readingShow less
I was canceled by three newspapers for criticizing Israel
Top image credit: dennizn and miss.cabul via shutterstock.com

I was canceled by three newspapers for criticizing Israel

Media

As a freelance writer, I know I have to produce copy that meets the expectations of editors and management. When I write opinion pieces, I know well that my arguments should closely align with the publication’s general outlook. But I’ve always believed that if my views on any particular topic diverged from an outlet I’m writing for, it was acceptable to express those viewpoints in other publications.

But I’ve recently discovered that this general rule does not apply to criticism of Israel.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.