Follow us on social

Marco rubio state department

Rubio takes annual human rights report to new cynical heights

Ignoring Israel's abuses and erasing crimes wholesale has made this exercise a joke. But it is it any worse than what the Biden admin was doing?

Analysis | Washington Politics

After much delay, Marco Rubio’s State Department finally released the 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, known internally as the Human Rights Reports (HRRs).

These congressionally mandated reports are usually published in early spring about the events of the previous year. In addition to the significant lag in their release, the 2024 reports are drastically shorter and cover a much narrower range of human rights abuses than in previous years. They no longer include prison conditions and detention centers, civil liberties violations, or rampant corruption.

Moreover the State Department has dropped sections on abuses of women and no longer documents crimes such as rape, female genital mutilation, sexual exploitation of children, and infanticide, nor abuses against vulnerable populations like LGBTQ individuals and the disabled.

In particular, the administration has intentionally obscured horrific human rights abuses by countries like Israel and El Salvador — the 2023 report on Israel-Palestine was 103 pages, the 2024 report is a mere nine pages, and stresses crimes committed by Hamas while largely ignoring those committed by Israel.

For example, the 2023 report on El Salvador described the country’s “harsh and life-threatening prison conditions,” while no such section exists in the 2024 reports. Not surprisingly, that is where the Trump Administration has been deporting migrants for incarceration. Meanwhile, countries that previously had minor human rights infractions, such as the UK and Germany, came in for particular criticism under the current administration’s emphasis on alleged violations of freedom of expression, in particular restrictions placed on far-right groups.

By slashing the reports themselves, as well as eliminating the bureau responsible for producing them, the Trump administration has signaled to the world that it does not care about human rights. This is likely to be interpreted by countries around the world, whether U.S. partners like Israel and Egypt, or adversaries like China and Russia, as signaling that they can abuse their populations with impunity.

Members of the Democratic establishment have criticized Trump’s disregard for human rights, as embodied by these reports. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, ranking Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee, told the Washington Post, “These reports are required by law to ensure American taxpayer dollars do not support autocrats who violate the rights of their citizens.” This conveniently ignores the fact that under Biden and all previous U.S. presidents, the U.S. has sent tax dollars to support countless autocrats who violate their people’s human rights.

The original purpose of the reports was to determine a country’s eligibility for receiving U.S. security assistance , although this original intent has never been fulfilled. Although Trump blatantly disregards human rights, I fear that, in contrast, a narrative is already taking shape that the Biden administration put human rights at the center of its foreign policy, as Biden pledged to do upon taking office. It very clearly did not.

I worked on the Human Rights Reports under Biden, specifically in the office focused on human rights in the Middle East, the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, that Trump subsequently dismantled. I have written previously about the frustration of trying to advocate for human rights within the U.S. government, where such considerations have rarely driven policy outcomes and instead were primarily used as a cudgel to punish countries the U.S. already considered adversaries, from Russia and China to Iran and Cuba.

While these governments certainly engage in gross violations of their citizens’ human rights, the U.S. uses these crimes to justify sanctions and a range of other punishments, while similar abuses committed by U.S. partners do not motivate similar punitive measures.

My office’s already challenging mission to promote human rights became essentially impossible after October 7, 2023, as the U.S. aided and abetted Israel’s collective punishment against the Palestinian people, including blockading aid, bombing of hospitals and shelters, and killing of tens of thousands of civilians. Any time that our office tried to scold Arab governments for imprisoning dissidents or intimidating journalists, they asked how we could criticize them, given what we were enabling Israel to do in Gaza. The Biden administration’s hypocrisy on human rights was rank — in particular, its strenuous emphasis on the human rights of Ukrainians but complete disregard for those of Palestinians.

In the end, I do not know which approach is more destructive to the cause of protecting human rights: the Biden administration’s selective and therefore hypocritical prioritization of some people’s rights and not others, or the Trump administration’s near total disregard for human rights.

For many people around the world who have long chafed at America’s self- righteousness in the human rights sphere, Trump’s bald indifference will feel, at the very least, more honestly reflective of America’s real policies.


Top photo credit: Secretary Marco Rubio is interviewed by Lara Trump at the Department of State in Washington, D.C., July 21, 2025. (Official State Department photo by Freddie Everett)
Analysis | Washington Politics
El Sisi Netanyahu
Top image credit: miss.cabul / Shutterstock.com

Why Egypt can't criticize Israel for at least another two decades

Middle East

In early August, Israeli energy company NewMed announced a record-breaking $35 billion deal to supply natural gas to Egypt, nearly tripling its current imports and binding Cairo’s energy future to its neighbor until at least 2040.

Though Egyptian officials were quick to frame this not as a new agreement but as an “amendment” to a 2019 deal, the sheer scale of the deal — the largest in Israel’s export history — is indicative of a deepening and dangerous dependence on its neighbor for its energy needs.

The pact is driven by the mutual, if asymmetric, political needs of two deeply entangled governments. For Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the deal provides the energy needed to prevent domestic unrest. For Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, the benefits are especially outsized. The $35 billion pact provides a massive, long-term revenue stream and solidifies Israel’s status as a critical energy player in the Eastern Mediterranean. Furthermore, it delivers a strategic victory by binding the most populous Arab state into deep and lasting economic dependency.

keep readingShow less
Stephen Cohen's legacy: Warnings unheeded, a war without end
Stephen Cohen, 2015. (Courtesy of Katrina vanden Huevel)

Stephen Cohen's legacy: Warnings unheeded, a war without end

Europe

Russian historian Stephen F. Cohen, who passed away five years ago this September, occupied a position in American intellectual life that has become increasingly rare: a tenured Ivy League professor with deep establishment credentials who used his considerable influence to challenge rather than echo establishment narratives.

As Ukrainian-American journalist Lev Golinkin observed, Cohen was “someone who didn’t just write about history but had dinner with it,” having briefed U.S. presidents and maintained friendships with figures like former Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev.

keep readingShow less
Jeremy Corbyn
Top image credit: Jeremy Corbyn, ex-Leader of the Labour Party seen protesting the starving of Gaza outside Downing Street. July 2025 (Lab Mo / SOPA Images via Reuters Connect)

Will UK's populist surge challenge support for Ukraine?

Europe

The rise of public support for the populist right, and in some cases also the populist left, has remodeled political competition in France, Germany, Italy, and Poland.

British politics is increasingly following this trend, although a general election is not due until 2029. The right populist Reform UK party, led by veteran Brexiteer Nigel Farage, has been leading in opinion polls since April, clearly sapping the remaining strength of Britain’s venerable Conservative (Tory) Party. The unpopular Labour administration of Prime Minister Keir Starmer now faces a left populist challenge from a new party led by the former Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.