Follow us on social

google cta
Mike Waltz

Reports: Trump fires embattled hawk Mike Waltz from White House

News sources say the head of the National Security Council and members of his staff have been sacked, likely due to Signalgate imbroglio

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Update 5/1, 3:30PM: President Donald Trump says he is nominating Mike Waltz, who is being taken out of his role as National Security Advisor, for U.S Ambassador to the UN. More on that from Axios.


Breaking news reports say Mike Waltz is out as National Security Council (NSC) advisor, as well as his colleague, principal deputy national security advisor Alex Wong.

The former congressman has been embroiled in scandal since assuming the post, most notably the “Signalgate” debacle, where he and other top officials discussed Yemen war plans in a group chat on messaging application Signal — which included the Atlantic’s Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg.

The stormclouds have been building for some time: indeed, the Atlantic’s Isaac Stanley-Becker told Wolf Blitzer two days ago on CNN that Waltz was on "thin ice,” especially because of his role in “Signalgate.” Waltz had apparently added Goldberg to the chat in a phone mishap.

As the morning news broke across social media, word was that U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff would be first in line for Waltz's replacement.

Experts tell RS that the officials’ ouster, depending on their replacements, may provide opportunities for a more restrained foreign policy during Trump’s second round in the Oval Office.

“Waltz and Wong were among the more hawkish of Trump’s close advisors, especially on issues related to Iran and China, including U.S. policy toward Taiwan,” said Jennifer Kavanagh, Senior Fellow and Director of Military Analysis at Defense Priorities.

“At many points, both Waltz and Wong have seemed out of sync with President Trump, who very clearly wants to avoid a war with Iran and is seemingly less committed to defending Taiwan militarily than past presidents," she added. "While much depends on who takes their place, the removal of Waltz and Wong opens the door for replacements that share Trump’s preferences for military restraint and diplomacy.”

“Before he was cheerleading the unconstitutional use of the U.S. military, Waltz was one of the most anti-China members of Congress, asserting that the U.S. was already in a Cold War with Beijing,” Dr. Annelle Sheline, Research Fellow in the Middle East program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Responsible Statecraft.

“His positions generally reflected a neoconservative approach to foreign policy; his selection as NatSec Advisor had raised questions about how he would gel with a president who had pledged to keep the U.S. out of unnecessary wars. His ouster may signal an opportunity for more deal-making and less saber rattling,” Sheline added.

"Now that Waltz is on the way out, it is possible that the Trump administration might back away from some of the most extreme demands that they have been making in the in direct talks with Iran," writer Dan Larison offered. "However, it is unlikely that there will be any major policy shifts.Trump’s remaining national security team is still very hawkish, as shown by the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s threats against Iran this week."

Replacements pending, it seems Waltz and Wong may not be the only Trump administration officials on the chopping block: as Fox Senior White House Correspondent Jacqui Heinrich wrote on X, “additional names [are] likely to come.”

Larison called the Witkoff prospect "a very odd choice in some respects because of Witkoff’s lack of foreign policy and government experience," he said.

"Appointing Witkoff could be a sign that the president is pulling back from the more aggressive foreign policy positions that he took in the first three months, or it could simply mean that the president wants to fill the position with one of his friends."


Top photo credit: National Security Advisor Mike Waltz (Phil Pasquini/Shutterstock)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.