Follow us on social

Tim Kaine

Senate vote to exert war powers over Trump fails

The resolution would have blocked the president from launching more unprovoked attacks on Iran

Reporting | QiOSK

The Senate largely along partisan lines voted down a resolution that would have prevented President Trump from launching further attacks on Iran.

The resolution — introduced by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) just days before U.S. military forces bombed Iranian nuclear sites last Saturday — failed by a vote of 47-53, with Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) breaking ranks with Democrats in voting against, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) the only Republican supporting.

It’s unclear what those strikes accomplished. While President Trump has been boasting about their alleged impact, saying they “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, a leaked assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency found that they “did not,” as CNN first reported, “destroy the core components of the country’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months.”

Meanwhile, Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said on Friday that Iran’s nuclear facilities “suffered enormous damage” from the U.S. attack. A CIA assessment headed by Director John Ratcliffe a day after the DIA leak said "new intelligence from a historically reliable source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.” Senators briefed behind closed doors Thursday came away with different impressions of the damage.

Hours before the vote, Kaine noted that the framers of the U.S. Constitution “decided that war was too big a decision for one person” and said “the United States should not be at war without a vote of Congress.”

Later in his remarks, the Virginia Democrat highlighted one of Trump’s recent social media posts in which the president shared a parody of the Beach Boys’ song “Barbara Ann” that was about bombing Iran. Kaine then recalled the framers’ stance on war powers: “We shouldn't premise a decision to send our sons and daughters into war on the judgment of a single person.”

Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) — who has previously championed Congress’s war powers role over the executive branch — opposed Kaine’s resolution, saying before the vote that he was “confident that Iran was prepared to pose a significant threat to the security of the United States and Israel, making the president’s decision to pursue limited, targeted action necessary and based on the appropriate legal foundation.” He said he thinks Kaine's resolution is unnecessary because Trump got a ceasefire and is purportedly not seeking more military action.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who also previously supported efforts at reining in the executive branch's war powers, voted against the Kaine-sponsored measure on Iran.

Sen. Paul, who supported the resolution, said just before the vote that he was doing so “to stand up for the Constitution, to stand up for American service members and to stand up for America's strategic interest.”

Paul chastised those clamoring for more war with Iran.

“Many advocates for war, giving voice to their real feelings, have loudly opposed the current cease fire,” he said. “Those arguing against a cease fire give a callous testimony, insensitive to the cruelties of war.”

Paul added, “The American people are sick and tired of sending their children to fight and die in war zones on the other side of the world with no tangible U.S. interests at stake, abdicating our constitutional responsibility by allowing the executive branch to unilaterally introduce U.S. troops into wars is an affront to the Constitution and to the American people.”

The House will vote on similar war powers-related legislation in the coming weeks, one of which is bipartisan, led by Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.).


Top image credit: screen grab via senate.gov
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump's most underrated diplomatic win: Belarus
Top image credit: Brian Jason and Siarhei Liudkevich via shutterstock.com

Trump's most underrated diplomatic win: Belarus

Europe

Rarely are foreign policy scholars and analysts blessed with as crystalline a case study in abject failure as the Western approach to Belarus since 2020. From promoting concrete security interests, advancing human rights to everything in between, there is no metric by which anything done toward Minsk can be said to have worked.

But even more striking has been the sheer sense of aggrieved befuddlement with the Trump administration for acknowledging this reality and seeking instead to repair ties with Belarus.

keep readingShow less
These Israeli-backed gangs could wreck the Gaza ceasefire
Ashraf al-Mansi walks in front of members of his Popular Army militia. The group, previously known as the Counter-Terrorism Service, has worked with the Israeli military and is considered by many in Gaza to be a criminal gang. (Via the Facebook page of Yasser Abu Shabab)

These Israeli-backed gangs could wreck the Gaza ceasefire

Middle East

Frightening images have emerged from Gaza in the week since a fragile ceasefire took hold between Israel and Hamas. In one widely circulated video, seven blindfolded men kneel in line with militants arrayed behind them. Gunshots ring out in unison, and the row of men collapse in a heap as dozens of spectators look on.

The gruesome scenes appear to be part of a Hamas effort to reestablish control over Gaza through a crackdown on gangs and criminal groups that it says have proliferated during the past two years of war and chaos. In the minds of Israel and its backers, the killings reveal Hamas’ true colors — and represent a preview of what the group may do if it’s allowed to maintain some degree of power.

keep readingShow less
Poland farmers protest EU
Top photo credit: Several thousand people rally against a proposed EU migration scheme in Warsaw, Poland on 11 October, 2025. In a rally organized by the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party thousands gathered to oppose the EU migration pact and an agriculture deal with Mercosur countries. (Photo by Jaap Arriens / Sipa USA)

Poland’s Janus face on Ukraine is untenable

Europe

Of all the countries in Europe, Poland grapples with deep inconsistencies in its approach to both Russia and to Ukraine. As a result, the pro-Europe coalition government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk is coming under increasing pressure as the duplicity becomes more evident.

In its humanitarian response to Ukraine since the war began in 2022, Poland has undoubtedly been one of the most generous among European countries. Its citizens and NGOs threw open their doors to provide food and shelter to Ukrainian women and children fleeing for safety. By 2023, over 1.6 million Ukrainian refugees had applied for asylum or temporary protection in Poland, with around 1 million still present in Poland today.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.