Follow us on social

Austria’s Freedom Party breaks ranks on Ukraine

Austria’s Freedom Party breaks ranks on Ukraine

More political upheaval over Europe's handling of the war, fueling populist-nationalism across Europe

Analysis | Europe

The rise of the populist right in European elections continues as Herbert Kickl, the controversial leader of the populist-nationalist Freedom Party (FPÖ) appears on course to become Austria’s new chancellor after attempts to form a centrist coalition collapsed.

In a historic first for postwar Austria, the Freedom Party won the elections in September with 29%, followed closely by the center-right People’s Party (ÖVP). Chancellor Karl Nehammer resigned after having failed, after prolonged talks, to form a coalition with the social democrats and liberals. On January 6, President Van der Bellen asked Kickl to attempt to form a government. Talks immediately began with the interim leader of the People’s Party.

The Freedom Party campaigned on opposition to supporting Ukraine. The People’s Party and other major parties favor continued humanitarian and diplomatic support; neutral Austria has not supplied weapons but has backed EU sanctions against Russia. Because ÖVP and FPÖ agree on immigration and other domestic policy issues, they are considered likely to be able to form a governing coalition, having between them a comfortable majority of seats. However, it is unclear whether FPÖ’s distinctive positions on foreign and security policy will be tempered by partnership with ÖVP.

The novel prospect of a government headed by FPÖ has elicited alarm and anxiety among many Austrians, although the ÖVP and FPÖ have previously governed together, with FPÖ as the more junior partner. In this sense, Austria has long since abandoned the ‘firewall’ strategy followed by Germany, which forbids any coalition with the populist right. Kickl was Interior Minister under ÖVP Chancellor Sebastian Kurz until a major scandal in 2019 forced the Freedom Party out of power. Kickl has led the party’s recovery from near collapse in public support in the aftermath of the scandal.

The uneasy partnership of the two parties began in the early 2000s when under the controversial leadership of Jörg Haider. Haider had moved the Freedom Party sharply to the right, and the EU imposed diplomatic sanctions on Austria to protest his party’s involvement in government. Once a speechwriter for Haider, Kickl follows in Haider’s footsteps with passionate and polarizing positions on immigration.

Germany’s Doppelganger?

Germany is approaching elections on February 23 with a solid “firewall” against coalition with the populist right Alternative for Germany (AfD). Because of the obvious parallels, the Austrian case is closely followed in Germany. The Greens’ leader Robert Habeck said Austria’s example showed that centrist parties needed to learn to stick together, while the AfD’s leader Alice Weidel called for the CDU/CSU to join AfD to form a “bourgeois” majority.

As in Germany, Austria’s center-right supports Ukraine and sanctioning Russia, while the populist right in both countries firmly opposes continuing on that policy course. Both center-right and center-left in both countries call for sharp curbs on immigration, reflecting, to some extent, anxieties among the public about security. Kickl’s attacks on the mainstream press and media, his call for a ‘Fortress’ Austria to keep out migrants, and his aspiration to serve as ‘Volkskanzler’ (people’s chancellor) evoke comparisons to the AfD’s Bjorn Höcke, the party’s leader in the state of Thuringia.

AfD now polls at about 20%, second to the center-right CDU/CSU at about 30% but ahead of the social democrat SPD (16%) and the Greens (13%). If the trend of growing support for AfD continues, it will become more and more difficult to form stable governing majorities that exclude them. From the standpoint of the CDU/CSU, the cooperation in governing coalitions of the center-right ÖVP and FPÖ may serve as a cautionary tale because FPÖ has, at last, surpassed the ÖVP in popular support and is, therefore, less amenable to moderating its more controversial positions. On the other hand, some conservative members of the German center-right might eventually be tempted to form a coalition with AfD rather than being obliged to adopt the compromises needed to form a “grand coalition” with the center-left Social Democrats. Coalition with CDU/CSU is clearly the AfD’s principal avenue to power.

'Orban 2.0' a potential headache for Brussels — and Kyiv

Kickl is close to Hungary’s President Viktor Orban and calls him a role model. If Kickl becomes Chancellor, he is likely to join Orban in opposing the periodic renewal of EU sanctions on Russia. Kickl’s Freedom Party and Orban’s Fidesz in June founded the “Patriots for Europe” action in the European Parliament, where they press for enhancing the power of member states and curbing the power of the Commission.

Although Austria is not a heavyweight in Europe, the addition of one more EU member to the small camp of open opponents of continuing support for Ukraine will have consequences, especially as negotiations to end the war may soon begin. However, it is possible that ÖVP will be able to win concessions from Kickl on the Ukraine issue in return for joining the governing coalition.


Top Photo: Austrian far-right Freedom Party (FPO) Secretary General Kickl addresses a news conference in Vienna. Source: Reuters
Analysis | Europe
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.