Follow us on social

google cta
Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.)

GOP senator: Congress in dark on ‘narco’ strikes

Todd Young told defense-tech audience it was time for lawmakers to bring unauthorized conflicts to a 'close'

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Discussing ongoing U.S. strikes against alleged drug smugglers, Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) called for lawmakers to assert congressional authority over when the U.S. uses armed force — and work to bring unauthorized conflicts to a close altogether.

At today’s Axios Future of Defense Summit, Sen. Young complained the Trump administration was not giving lawmakers enough information about its ongoing offensive against so-called “narco-terrorists,” in the Caribbean sea near Venezuela (though Secretary of Defense Hegseth said that the military had struck a suspected drug carrying vessel in the “East Pacific” on Tuesday. It was the eighth vessel struck since September in the ongoing campaign.)

“Congress isn't hearing enough [about the attacks] in any form, including a public forum. I think legal rationales behind these issues should be openly discussed and re-discussed on an ongoing basis,” he said. To address this lack of information, Sen. Young called for the Foreign Relations Committee to hold oversight hearings on the strikes.

But Sen. Young wanted to challenge such unauthorized conflicts altogether. “I think Congress needs to go further. Rather than just asserting our ability to authorize military force [as lawmakers] — we also need to officially bring to close these conflicts, and make clear that we have constitutional prerogatives that need to be consistently asserted,” he said.

To this end, the Senator, who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, also stressed his support for repealing Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs), namely the 2002 AUMF and the 1991 Gulf War AUMF.

“I’ve worked with Senator Kaine on efforts to repeal the 2002 ‘zombie’ AUMF, which could have been used for other purposes…[and] to repeal the first Gulf War AUMF,” he said.

The Trump administration argues that this "non-international armed conflict" is legal because it deems the smugglers terrorists. Lawmakers have repeatedly challenged that assertion.

Sen. Young’s statements follow ongoing legislative efforts to challenge the Trump administration’s campaign against so-called narco-terrorists in the Caribbean, where President Trump also recently floated the possibility of attacking Venezuela itself.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D.-Va.) has sponsored a War Powers Resolution to bar the use of armed force against or within Venezuela, unless “explicitly authorized by Congress”; he and resolution co-sponsors Sen. Rand Paul (R.-Ky) and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif), plan to force a vote on it in the near future.

A previous War Powers Resolution sponsored by Schiff and Kaine to block the president from using force against alleged drug smuggling without explicit congressional approval, failed early this month. It was rejected in committee largely along party lines, where Democrats mostly supported the resolution, and Republicans mostly rejected it.


Top Image Credit: Axios Future of Defense Summit 2025/ Axios (YouTube/Screenshot)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade
Top image credit: U.S. President Donald Trump talks to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts on the day of his speech to a joint session of Congress, in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., March 4, 2025. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Why SCOTUS won’t deter Trump’s desire to weaponize trade

QiOSK

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court today ruled against the White House on a key economic initiative of the Trump administration, concluding that the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president the right to impose tariffs.

The ruling was not really a surprise; the tone of the questioning by several justices in early November was overwhelmingly skeptical of the administration’s argument, as prediction markets rightly concluded. Given the likelihood of this result, it should also come as no surprise that the Trump administration has already been plotting ways to work around the decision.

keep readingShow less
Trump Iran
Top image credit: Lucas Parker and FotoField via shutterstock.com

No, even a 'small attack' on Iran will lead to war

QiOSK

The Wall Street Journal reports that President Donald Trump is considering a small attack to force Iran to agree to his nuclear deal, and if Tehran refuses, escalate the attacks until Iran either agrees or the regime falls.

Here’s why this won’t work.

keep readingShow less
As Iran strikes loom, US and UK fight over Indian Ocean base
TOP IMAGE CREDIT: An aerial view of Diego Garcia, the Chagossian Island home to one of the U.S. military's 750 worldwide bases. The UK handed sovereignty of the islands back to Mauritius, with the stipulation that the U.S. must be allowed to continue its base's operation on Diego Garcia for the next 99 years. (Kev1ar82 / Shutterstock.com).

As Iran strikes loom, US and UK fight over Indian Ocean base

QiOSK

As the U.S. surges troops to the Middle East, a battle is brewing over a strategically significant American base in the middle of the Indian Ocean.

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he would oppose any effort to return the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, arguing that a U.S. base on the island of Diego Garcia may be necessary to “eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous [Iranian] Regime.” The comment came just a day after the State Department reiterated its support for the U.K.’s decision to give up sovereignty over the islands while maintaining a 99-year lease for the base.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.