Follow us on social

google cta
Shanghai Cooperation Organization 2025

Major Shanghai summit of US 'adversaries' sends clear message

Unipolarity is in decline, but Washington can and should find a non-militarized way to stay relevant

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a grouping of Asian and Eurasian states, opened on Sunday in the Chinese city of Tianjin. China is aiming to maximize the payoffs from the spectacle of the SCO’s largest-ever gathering.

More than 20 world leaders including those from North Korea, India, Iran, central Asian states, Turkey, and China’s close partner Russia are being hosted by President Xi Jinping. The Secretary-General of the United Nations and ASEAN are both taking part. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto had planned to attend but cancelled at the last minute due to anti-government protests raging outside his capital today.

The SCO’s roots are as a security grouping, but is increasingly taking on economic and connectivity agendas. During this summit, China is pushing for an SCO development bank and new financing arrangements on extraction of critical minerals. But bilateral meetings will also be important to watch, especially ones between China and India, China and Russia, and Russia and Iran.

The summit comes during a time when the United States is building tariff walls with most of the world and is increasingly perceived as an unreliable partner by many trading powers. Beijing has tried to take advantage of the turbulence by presenting itself as a stabilizer and a hub for trade and technology in Asia and the Global South.

U.S. policy volatility and uncertainty contrasts with a broader stability and economic dynamism in key parts of Asia. Though much of the region has made major compromises with Washington on the tariffs question, summits like the one at Tianjin enable participating states to further push diversification and multi-alignment.

This is especially true during this summit for India and Indonesia. India, with its relations with the United States facing the greatest crisis in more than a quarter century, is looking to stabilize its difficult China relationship and further deepen its already strong ties to Russia. Indonesia too continues to play all sides. Having struck a trade deal with the United States after a difficult period of negotiations, it has also been deepening its relations with both China and Russia.

The increased recourse to hedging and multi-alignment across the international system can only accelerate the decline of unipolarity in the longer-run. In order to remain relevant, the United States needs to find ways to present itself as a stable and reliable partner. This cannot be achieved through trying to bring back primacy, especially through deepening militarization.

A better way may be finding common interests and their joint pursuit with key middle powers in Asia and elsewhere.


Top photo credit: August 31, 2025, Tianjin, China: Iran's President MASOUD PEZZESHKIAN (R) arrives for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit 2025 in Tianjin. (Credit Image: © Iranian Presidency via ZUMA Press Wire)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
G7 Summit
Top photo credit: May 21, 2023, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan: (From R to L) Comoros' President Azali Assoumani, World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan. (Credit Image: © POOL via ZUMA Press Wire)

Middle Powers are setting the table so they won't be 'on the menu'

Asia-Pacific

The global order was already fragmenting before Donald Trump returned to the White House. But the upended “rules” of global economic and foreign policies have now reached a point of no return.

What has changed is not direction, but speed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s remarks in Davos last month — “Middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu” — captured the consequences of not acting quickly. And Carney is not alone in those fears.

keep readingShow less
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.