Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_2252996863-scaled

NATO foray into Asia risks driving China and Russia closer together

A new Tokyo bureau will be the first of its kind, further cementing the alliance’s shift toward the region.

Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

NATO plans to open a liaison office in Japan to coordinate relations with Tokyo and other friendly powers in the Indo-Pacific, according to a new report from Nikkei Asia.

The office, which will be the first of its kind in the region, represents a notable step in NATO’s shift toward confronting China, which officially began last year when the alliance formally identified Beijing as a threat. 

As the Guardian noted, the move is likely to further increase tensions between the West and China, which has often expressed concern over potential NATO inroads in Asia. It also risks driving concerns from alliance members that favor a less confrontational approach with Beijing, according to George Beebe of the Quincy Institute.

“When you go out of area, you're going to inevitably raise concerns inside the alliance about what the alliance's priorities ought to be,” Beebe argued, noting that the office could “exacerbate differences between the United States and some Europeans about how to deal with China.”

It remains unclear who will pay for the office. According to Nikkei, the one-person bureau, which is expected to open next year, will lead periodic consultations between NATO and its Pacific partners, including Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, and Australia.

The decision to open the office highlights Japan’s interest in deepening cooperation with NATO. Notably, Tokyo also plans to open a separate diplomatic mission to NATO in Belgium in order to further promote its ties with the alliance.

In recent years, NATO has also stood up liaison offices in Ukraine, Georgia, Kuwait, and Moldova.

As Professor Michito Tsuruoka of Keio University told Nikkei, the move emphasizes NATO’s view that China and Russia are becoming increasingly close. “In addition to the problems China poses by itself, a new dimension has been added: that of China as a supporter of Russia. This now becomes directly related to Europe's security,” Tsuruoka said.

But Beebe worries that these concerns could turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy. “There's a grave risk that NATO moving into Asian Affairs is likely to bring Russia and China even closer together into what could amount to a de facto alliance between the two of them against what they see as a common Western or NATO enemy,” he said. “I don't think that's in the interest of the United States or Europe to encourage.”


(Shutterstock/ Andy.LIU)
google cta
Asia-Pacific
Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran
Top image credit: Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby speaks at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. (Screengrab via armed-services.senate.gov)

Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran

QiOSK

The U.S. is pursuing “scoped and reasonable objectives” in its military campaign against Iran and is not seeking regime change through force, argued Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby in a Tuesday Senate hearing.

When pressed about why the campaign began with the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Colby declined to comment directly. “I’m talking about the goals of the American military campaign,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Those are Israeli operations.”

keep readingShow less
US missiles
Top photo credit: . DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Vince Parker, U.S. Air Force.

Trump: We have 'unlimited' weapons to fight 'forever' war

QiOSK

In a startling Truth Social post overnight on Monday, President Donald Trump defied reality and claimed that U.S. weapons were "unlimited" and the U.S. could fight "forever" with "these supplies."


keep readingShow less
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.