Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1368689957-scaled

Defense industry CEOs face tough questions at Politico conference ... from a protester

The event’s sponsors were given a prominent platform to sell the military industrial complex without any official scrutiny.

Reporting | Media

Politico’s national security and foreign policy coverage took some heat late last year for being sponsored in part by the defense industry, and the Beltway media outlet leaned into its relationship with weapons makers this week by prominently featuring industry leaders at its 2022 Defense Summit in Washington. 

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and another less well-known firm, Improbable U.S. Defense & National Security, sponsored the Summit. But the companies’ names were not just displayed prominently at the Summit and on its website — as is somewhat usual for this kind of event — Politico also gave a representative from each company a prominent role in the Summit by participating in what it dubbed “executive conversations.” 

Except the three panels were less conversational and more infomercial, as the Politico interviewer in each appeared to rattle off a series of scripted questions that let the companies explain why their products are necessary for the defense of the United States. It was essentially similar to sponsored content one might see on some mainstream news websites. 

Politico CEO Goli Sheikholeslami was tasked with shepherding Lockheed’s ads with leading questions for its CEO, Jim Taiclet. Sheikholeslami teed up Taiclet’s talking points about a dangerous world with China as the focus, Taiclet’s “frontline perspective,” a reference to his military service, the inhibiting nature of continuing resolutions on military contracts, and Lockheed’s future outlook. Taiclet argued that the Pentagon needed a parallel funding pipeline, “a swim lane,” so that the defense industry could make its products faster. "That is the only way we are going to keep up with the Chinese,” he said.

Politico’s vice president for client partnerships and paid media Heidi Sommer later gave Improbable president and general manager Caitlin Dohrman many opportunities to tell us “about this technology that you all have been pioneering.” In response to Sommer’s questions, Dohrman appeared to be reading her answers directly from a notebook she had on stage. 

Lastly, Cally Baute, Politico’s senior vice president for consumer business spoke with Raytheon president Wes Kremer. Baute praised Raytheon’s hypersonic weapons as “game changers for the military,” and provided Kremer with many opportunities to say why the U.S. military needs Raytheon’s products. 

The only scrutiny any of these defense firms received was from a protester during Taiclet’s “executive conversation.” She crashed the stage holding a sign that read, “Lockheed Loves War,” saying that the company is “a war profiteer.”  

“The U.S. military is the largest polluter in the entire history of the world,” the protester said. “You’re guilty and the whole world knows it. There’s no place for you in our future.” 

“Don’t be rough with her,” Taiclet can be heard telling the security as they ushered the protester off the stage. 

After the scene ended, neither Sheikholeslami nor Taiclet acknowledged what had just happened. 

“So, you were talking about the budget process,” Sheikholeslami said. 


Editorial credit: Serhii Yevdokymov / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | Media
Nato Summit Trump
Top photo credit: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, President Donald Trump, at the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague (NATO/Flickr)

Did Trump just dump the Ukraine War into the Europeans' lap?

Europe

The aerial war between Israel and Iran over the past two weeks sucked most of the world’s attention away from the war in Ukraine.

The Hague NATO Summit confirms that President Donald Trump now sees paying for the war as Europe’s problem. It’s less clear that he will have the patience to keep pushing for peace.

keep readingShow less
Antonio Guterres and Ursula von der Leyen
Top image credit: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com

UN Charter turns 80: Why do Europeans mock it so?

Europe

Eighty years ago, on June 26, 1945, the United Nations Charter was signed in San Francisco. But you wouldn’t know it if you listened to European governments today.

After two devastating global military conflicts, the Charter explicitly aimed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” And it did so by famously outlawing the use of force in Article 2(4). The only exceptions were to be actions taken in self-defense against an actual or imminent attack and missions authorized by the U.N. Security Council to restore collective security.

keep readingShow less
IRGC
Top image credit: Tehran Iran - November 4, 2022, a line of Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps troops crossing the street (saeediex / Shutterstock.com)

If Iranian regime collapses or is toppled, 'what's next?'

Middle East

In a startling turn of events in the Israel-Iran war, six hours after Iran attacked the Al Udeid Air Base— the largest U.S. combat airfield outside of the U.S., and home of the CENTCOM Forward Headquarters — President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire in the 12-day war, quickly taking effect over the subsequent 18 hours. Defying predictions that the Iranian response to the U.S. attack on three nuclear facilities could start an escalatory cycle, the ceasefire appears to be holding. For now.

While the bombing may have ceased, calls for regime change have not. President Trump has backtracked on his comments, but other influential voices have not. John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, said Tuesday that regime change must still happen, “…because this is about the regime itself… Until the regime itself is gone, there is no foundation for peace and security in the Middle East.” These sentiments are echoed by many others to include, as expected, Reza Pahlavi, exiled son of the deposed shah.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.