Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1368689957-scaled

Defense industry CEOs face tough questions at Politico conference ... from a protester

The event’s sponsors were given a prominent platform to sell the military industrial complex without any official scrutiny.

Reporting | Media
google cta
google cta

Politico’s national security and foreign policy coverage took some heat late last year for being sponsored in part by the defense industry, and the Beltway media outlet leaned into its relationship with weapons makers this week by prominently featuring industry leaders at its 2022 Defense Summit in Washington. 

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and another less well-known firm, Improbable U.S. Defense & National Security, sponsored the Summit. But the companies’ names were not just displayed prominently at the Summit and on its website — as is somewhat usual for this kind of event — Politico also gave a representative from each company a prominent role in the Summit by participating in what it dubbed “executive conversations.” 

Except the three panels were less conversational and more infomercial, as the Politico interviewer in each appeared to rattle off a series of scripted questions that let the companies explain why their products are necessary for the defense of the United States. It was essentially similar to sponsored content one might see on some mainstream news websites. 

Politico CEO Goli Sheikholeslami was tasked with shepherding Lockheed’s ads with leading questions for its CEO, Jim Taiclet. Sheikholeslami teed up Taiclet’s talking points about a dangerous world with China as the focus, Taiclet’s “frontline perspective,” a reference to his military service, the inhibiting nature of continuing resolutions on military contracts, and Lockheed’s future outlook. Taiclet argued that the Pentagon needed a parallel funding pipeline, “a swim lane,” so that the defense industry could make its products faster. "That is the only way we are going to keep up with the Chinese,” he said.

Politico’s vice president for client partnerships and paid media Heidi Sommer later gave Improbable president and general manager Caitlin Dohrman many opportunities to tell us “about this technology that you all have been pioneering.” In response to Sommer’s questions, Dohrman appeared to be reading her answers directly from a notebook she had on stage. 

Lastly, Cally Baute, Politico’s senior vice president for consumer business spoke with Raytheon president Wes Kremer. Baute praised Raytheon’s hypersonic weapons as “game changers for the military,” and provided Kremer with many opportunities to say why the U.S. military needs Raytheon’s products. 

The only scrutiny any of these defense firms received was from a protester during Taiclet’s “executive conversation.” She crashed the stage holding a sign that read, “Lockheed Loves War,” saying that the company is “a war profiteer.”  

“The U.S. military is the largest polluter in the entire history of the world,” the protester said. “You’re guilty and the whole world knows it. There’s no place for you in our future.” 

“Don’t be rough with her,” Taiclet can be heard telling the security as they ushered the protester off the stage. 

After the scene ended, neither Sheikholeslami nor Taiclet acknowledged what had just happened. 

“So, you were talking about the budget process,” Sheikholeslami said. 


Editorial credit: Serhii Yevdokymov / Shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | Media
Tony Blair Gaza
Top photo credit: Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair attends a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a U.S.-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, October 13, 2025. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/Pool/File Photo

Phase farce: No way 'Board of Peace' replaces reality in Gaza

Middle East

The Trump administration’s announcements about the Gaza Strip would lead one to believe that implementation of President Trump’s 20-point peace plan, later largely incorporated into a United Nations Security Council resolution, is progressing quite smoothly.

As such, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff announced this month on social media the “launch of Phase Two” of the plan, “moving from ceasefire to demilitarization, technocratic governance, and reconstruction.” But examination of even just a couple of Witkoff’s assertions in his announcement shows that "smooth" or even "implementation" are bitter overstatements.

keep readingShow less
Trump Polk
Top image credit: Samuele Wikipediano 1348 via wikimedia commons/lev radin via shutterstock.com

On Greenland, Trump wants to be like Polk

Washington Politics

Any hopes that Wednesday’s meeting of Greenland and Denmark’s foreign ministers with Vice President Vance and Secretary Rubio might point toward an end of the Trump administration’s attempts to annex the semiautonomous arctic territory were swiftly disappointed. “Fundamental disagreement” remains, according to Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen.

That these talks would yield no hint of a resolution should not be surprising. Much of Trump’s stated rationale for seeking ownership of Greenland — the need for an increased U.S. military presence, the ability to access the island’s critical mineral deposits, or the alleged imperative to keep the Chinese and Russians at bay — is eminently negotiable and even achievable under the status quo. If these were the president’s real goals he likely could have reached an agreement with Denmark months ago. That this standoff persists is a testament to Trump’s true motive: ownership for its own sake.

keep readingShow less
Swedish military Greenland

Top photo credit: HAGSHULT, SWEDEN- 7 MAY 2024: Military guards during the US Army exercise Swift Response 24 at the Hagshult base, Småland county, Sweden, during Tuesday. (Shutterstock/Sunshine Seeds)

Trump digs in as Europe sends troops to Greenland

Europe

Wednesday’s talks between American, Danish, and Greenlandic officials exposed the unbridgeable gulf between President Trump’s territorial ambitions and respect for sovereignty.

Trump now claims the U.S. needs Greenland to support the Golden Dome missile defense initiative. Meanwhile, European leaders are sending a small number of troops to Greenland.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.