Putting Ukrainian battle successes into cold, hard perspective
While our media calls recent gains a turning point, be warned this might be headed for something more ‘frozen’ and less satisfactory.
While our media calls recent gains a turning point, be warned this might be headed for something more ‘frozen’ and less satisfactory.
Fake news about Kim Jong-Un gets wall-to-wall coverage but citizens of a key ally opposing a joint military exercise goes largely unnoticed.
What is the Institute for the Study of War? And why do America’s elite media outlets trust it for all of their on-the-ground Ukraine information?
Why is the New York Times aghast that the United States has apparently lost its influence in the tiny Pacific island to the Chinese?
As Russian forces dig in and the US sends more arms to Kyiv, we need a public debate about the no longer ‘unthinkable’ nuclear option.
Without a trace of skepticism, Margaret Brennan turned a Sunday morning interview into a Lockheed Martin sales pitch.
As the US moves toward a proxy war against Russia, reporters aren’t asking tough questions about what that actually means.
Zealous anti-Russia voices are actually demanding that anyone opposing their views be silenced, and even criminally prosecuted.
The time ABC, CBS, and NBC spent reporting on the conflict in Eastern Europe has exceeded or equaled coverage of all other wars in the last 31 years.
Spreading potentially false claims and planting explosives outside cities can be ‘good’ as long as they’re done by the right side. Who knew?
There seems to be a growing confidence that the US can join this conflict without running into unacceptable risks.
She may be sincere in her concern for the liberal order, but what she’s asking for lacks common sense and an accurate historical view.
The Journal should have an obligation to inform its readers of any potential conflict of interest, particularly on foreign influence issues.
The media reporting on the former vice president’s trip didn’t ask the key question: Why?
Overwrought coverage stoked by alarmist officials and pundits can both shape and ratify bad policy decisions. We’ve seen it before.
An AP reporter does his job and pushes back on “intelligence” behind a reported Russian propaganda film. Bravo.
The famously hawkish editorial pages are doing PR for the Saudis.
A headline said today is the first Vets Day in decades ‘without a war underway.’ Huh?
Beijing built a base for some of their nuclear weapons we already knew about and apparently that’s a big scoop.
The cable news giant is an ‘official broadcaster’ of an upcoming UAE state-run, six-month ‘expo’ that is seemingly meant to burnish its global image.
The promotions were removed for about a month after the internet mocked the clear appearance of a conflict of interest.