Media help launder US military PR on joint drills with Israel
Three separate reports from CNN, NBC News, and Reuters were almost identical in repeating official talking points and ignoring criticism.
Three separate reports from CNN, NBC News, and Reuters were almost identical in repeating official talking points and ignoring criticism.
If public opinion doesn’t match up with the Washington program then it must be wrong, misunderstood, or worse, irrelevant.
Recent ‘files’ released by the social media giant’s new CEO Elon Musk reveal double standards on outing covert gov’t-backed programs.
The event’s sponsors were given a prominent platform to sell the military industrial complex without any official scrutiny.
History shows that while it may be uncomfortable advancing a regime’s line during an uprising, it’s important to get the facts straight.
Ret. Gen. ‘Chuck’ Wald regularly promoted a US policy favorable to Riyadh without disclosing his work for the kingdom’s defense ministry.
While our media calls recent gains a turning point, be warned this might be headed for something more ‘frozen’ and less satisfactory.
Fake news about Kim Jong-Un gets wall-to-wall coverage but citizens of a key ally opposing a joint military exercise goes largely unnoticed.
What is the Institute for the Study of War? And why do America’s elite media outlets trust it for all of their on-the-ground Ukraine information?
Why is the New York Times aghast that the United States has apparently lost its influence in the tiny Pacific island to the Chinese?
As Russian forces dig in and the US sends more arms to Kyiv, we need a public debate about the no longer ‘unthinkable’ nuclear option.
Without a trace of skepticism, Margaret Brennan turned a Sunday morning interview into a Lockheed Martin sales pitch.
As the US moves toward a proxy war against Russia, reporters aren’t asking tough questions about what that actually means.
Zealous anti-Russia voices are actually demanding that anyone opposing their views be silenced, and even criminally prosecuted.
The time ABC, CBS, and NBC spent reporting on the conflict in Eastern Europe has exceeded or equaled coverage of all other wars in the last 31 years.
Spreading potentially false claims and planting explosives outside cities can be ‘good’ as long as they’re done by the right side. Who knew?
There seems to be a growing confidence that the US can join this conflict without running into unacceptable risks.
She may be sincere in her concern for the liberal order, but what she’s asking for lacks common sense and an accurate historical view.
The Journal should have an obligation to inform its readers of any potential conflict of interest, particularly on foreign influence issues.
The media reporting on the former vice president’s trip didn’t ask the key question: Why?
Overwrought coverage stoked by alarmist officials and pundits can both shape and ratify bad policy decisions. We’ve seen it before.