Follow us on social

2022-04-07t072220z_76679486_rc27it9ymymj_rtrmadp_3_yemen-security-scaled

What the leadership shake-up in Yemen means for the ongoing war

With a War Powers Resolution looming in Congress to end the US role, the Saudi-led coalition may be seeing the writing on the wall.

Analysis | Middle East

Yemen's President-in-exile Abd Rabo Mansur Hadi announced on Thursday that he has transferred his authority to an eight member group called the Presidential Leadership Council. The move represents one of the most significant political developments in Yemen's civil war in years. 

Hadi’s announcement reflects the outcome of talks convened by the Saudis in Riyadh between various anti-Houthi militias, political leaders, and parties in Yemen. The Houthis had been invited to the talks, but declined to attend on the basis of Saudi Arabia’s role as a belligerent in Yemen’s civil war. With the formation of the Presidential Leadership Council — effectively an anti-Houthi coalition — it becomes clear why the Saudis preferred the Houthis not attend.

The formation of the Council reflects Saudi and possibly American frustration with President Hadi, whose lack of popularity, corruption, and determination to hang on to power had stymied efforts to establish a new political framework for Yemen. By insisting on maintaining power, Hadi had effectively empowered the Houthi rebels and others who opposed his rule. By stepping aside, Hadi has enabled a breakthrough that could lead to progress in resolving Yemen’s intractable conflict.

Why now, after years of intransigence? The timing likely partly reflects recent announcements from Congress that members would reintroduce a War Powers Resolution ending U.S. support for Saudi-led military actions in Yemen. Rather than face the humiliating prospect of losing their ability to operate their own air force without the assistance of U.S. military contractors, the Saudis prefer to pressure their proxies in Yemen to move towards resolving the conflict.

However, both the recent Ramadan ceasefire agreement and the formation of the Presidential Leadership Council may give the false impression that Yemen’s civil war is nearing resolution. Instead, these recent developments could incentivize an escalation in violence from both the anti-Houthi coalition and the Houthis themselves.

The Presidential Leadership Council includes all the major parties opposed to the Houthi rebels. Some are backed by the UAE, including the head of the Southern Transitional Council, a southern secessionist group; the Commander of the Giants Brigades that in January successfully pushed the Houthis out of territory in the provinces of Shabwa and al-Bayda; and the nephew of former president Ali Abdullah Saleh.

However, the inclusion of members of Yemen's main Islamist party, Islah, which the UAE views with suspicion, demonstrates that the UAE did not monopolize the make-up of the Council. One Islah member is the governor of Marib, the oil-rich province the Houthis have tried to take for years; another was a close ally of President Hadi. The Council also includes the governor of Hadramawt, a large and oil-rich province that has largely been spared by the civil war’s violence, as well as a sheikh from Saada, the Houthis’ home province, and a member of the General People’s Congress, the former ruling party.

The head of the council, Rashad al-Alimi, is also a member of the GPC and a former Minister of the Interior; he hails from Taiz, which the Houthis have blockaded since 2015.

These individuals only agree on one thing: their opposition to the Houthis. Houthi representatives condemned the creation of the Council. On Twitter, spokesman Mohammed Abdu Salam called it “a desperate attempt to rearrange the ranks of the mercenaries.” It is not yet clear if the Houthis will respond by breaking the two-month ceasefire and returning to the battlefield as soon as possible, or will conclude that they should come to the negotiating table now, before this newly formed coalition threatens their current hold on territory.

Likewise, with their newfound unity, the members of the Council may prefer to re-engage militarily to try to weaken the Houthis’ territorial control and reduce their influence at any future negotiations. Therefore, while the formation of the Council at least reflects some degree of political movement since the Saudis first intervened to back President Hadi seven years ago, it may portend an increase in violence, when the Yemeni population is already so devastated by war and hunger.

The U.S. role is crucial. The Biden administration should make clear to the Saudis, who oversaw the creation of the Council, that they must continue to adhere to the terms of the Ramadan ceasefire, including by allowing flights into Sanaa airport, which have not yet resumed, and fuel ships to reach Hodeidah. This could help to convince the Houthis that negotiating offers a more productive path forward than violence.

The United States also needs to make clear to the Saudis and the newly formed Council that Congress intends to pass a Yemen War Powers Resolution, which would end all U.S. military support for the Saudis. This, more than any other factor, may help incentivize the Saudis and the Council to uphold the ceasefire and push for negotiations rather than a resumption of fighting.


Yemen's President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi delivers a speech as he delegates his own powers to a presidential council, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia April 7, 2022 in this screen grab taken from a handout video. Yemen TV/via REUTERS TV THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. YEMEN OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN YEMEN.
Analysis | Middle East
remittance tax central america
Top photo credit: People line up to use an automated teller machine (ATM) outside a bank in Havana, Cuba, May 9, 2024. REUTERS/Alexandre Meneghini

Taxing remittances helps make US neighbors poorer, less stable

Latin America

Among the elements of the budget bill working its way through the U.S. Congress is a proposal for a 3.5% tax on all retail money transfers made by all non-citizens residing in the United States (including those with legal status) to other countries.

Otherwise known as remittences, these are transfers typically made by immigrants working in the U.S. to help support family back home.

keep readingShow less
US capitol building washington DC
Top image credit: U.S Capitol Building, Washington, DC. (Bill Perry /shutterstock)

Congress moves to put the brakes on Trump's unilateral bombing

Washington Politics

As a fragile ceasefire takes hold between Israel, Iran, and the United States, many questions remain.

With Iran’s nuclear program unquestionably damaged but likely not fully destroyed, will the Iranian government now race towards a bomb? Having repeatedly broken recent ceasefires in Lebanon and Gaza, will Prime Minister Netanyahu honor this one? And after having twice taken direct military action against Iran, will President Trump pursue the peace he claims to seek or once again choose war?

keep readingShow less
Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Ira
Top photo credit: Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran speaking at an event hosted by the Center for Political Thought & Leadership at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Israeli-fueled fantasy to bring back Shah has absolutely no juice

Middle East

The Middle East is a region where history rarely repeats itself exactly, but often rhymes in ways that are both tragic and absurd.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the current Israeli campaign against Iran. A campaign that, beneath its stated aims of dismantling Iran's nuclear and defense capabilities, harbors a deeper, more outlandish ambition: the hope that toppling the regime could install a friendly government under Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran's last Shah. Perhaps even paving the way for a monarchical restoration.

This is not a policy officially declared in Jerusalem or Washington, but it lingers in the background of Israel’s actions and its overt calls for Iranians to “stand up” to the Islamic Republic. In April 2023, Pahlavi was hosted in Israel by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog.

During the carefully choreographed visit, he prayed at the Western Wall, while avoiding the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount just above and made no effort to meet with Palestinian leaders. An analysis from the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs described the trip as a message that Israel recognizes Pahlavi as "the main leader of the Iranian opposition."

Figures like Gila Gamliel, a former minister of intelligence in the Israeli government, have openly called for regime change, declaring last year that a "window of opportunity has opened to overthrow the regime."

What might have been dismissed as a diplomatic gambit has, in the context of the current air war, been elevated into a strategic bet that military pressure can create the conditions for a political outcome of Israel's choosing.

The irony is hard to overstate. It was foreign intervention that set the stage for the current enmity. In 1953, a CIA/MI6 coup overthrew Mohammad Mossadegh, Iran’s last democratically elected leader. While the plot was triggered by his nationalization of the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the United States joined out of Cold War paranoia, fearing the crisis would allow Iran's powerful communist party to seize power and align the country with the Soviet Union.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.