Follow us on social

google cta
Screen-shot-2022-03-10-at-4.43.18-pm

Mike Pence flies to Israel on Miriam Adelson's private jet

The media reporting on the former vice president's trip didn't ask the key question: Why?

Analysis | Reporting | Media
google cta
google cta

Former Vice President Mike Pence appears to be courting the financial backing of the wealthiest Israeli, Miriam Adelson, who previously used her wealth to back the Republican Party’s support for abrogating from the Iran nuclear deal, moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, declaring the Golan Heights to be Israeli territory, “purged the sewer that was a so-called peace process,” according to Adelson, and pushed for former President Trump’s eventual clemency for convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard, a move long opposed by the FBI, Naval Intelligence, and the Pentagon.

Pence reportedly flew to Israel on a private plane owned by the Adelsons, the same means of transportation the family provided to Pollard following his clemency, an immediate departure for Israel with a hero’s welcome on the tarmac in Tel Aviv.

But the connection between Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon Adelson’s foreign policy motivations and their bankrolling of GOP candidates continues to be largely ignored or erased from reporting on Pence’s trip and Miriam’s reemergence, after her husband’s death, as the likely biggest Republican funder of the upcoming election cycles.

Yesterday, Axios reported that Pence traveled to Israel this week on one of the family’s planes. In a lengthy write-up, the online publication highlights that Miriam and her late husband Sheldon contributed nearly $220 million to Republican Party, emphasizing that “Pence broke news in the Israeli press by declaring the next Republican administration — which he predicted would take office in 2025 — would tear up any resurrected nuclear deal President Biden strikes with Iran.” Axios omitted the relevant information that opposing diplomatic efforts to constrain Iran’s nuclear program is a top agenda item for the Adelsons and other major GOP funders.

Jewish Insider reported that Miriam Adelson “upped her political involvement in recent months and intends to spend heavily in the forthcoming cycles” and quoted a Pence confidante conveying that the former vice president “paid his respects at Sheldon Adelson’s gravesite on the Mount of Olives.”

The Adelson-owned Israel Hayom scored an interview with Pence in Israel in which he argued that the Russian invasion of Ukraine made it “unconscionable that the American administration is at the same time negotiating at the side of the Russians to restart the Iranian nuclear deal.” The piece also  described Pence as “known to be a strong supporter of Israel.” The paper did not disclose Miriam Adelson’s role in bringing Pence to Israel or that the paper’s owner was the top funder of Trump and Pence’s 2016 and 2020 campaigns.

And Haaretz highlighted that Pence threw his lot in with Israel’s far-right, “draw[ing] public attention after touring the West Bank city of Hebron with two of Israel’s most notorious right-wing extremists, MK Itamar Ben-Gvir and far-right activist Baruch Marzel” and mentioned Pence “dined with Republican megadonor Miriam Adelson.”

All except Israel Hayom made explicit mention of Miriam Adelson’s role in the trip and her status as a Republican megadonor, but none linked her explicit, and often extreme, foreign policy vision with the courtship undertaken by Trump’s former vice president.

Miriam, for her part, has never hidden her foreign policy motivations for engaging in U.S. politics as a dual-U.S.-Israeli citizen and her contempt for Jewish Americans who increasingly reject the far-right positions taken by former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and current Prime Minister Naftali Bennet.

“By rights, Trump should enjoy sweeping support among U.S. Jews, just as he does among Israelis,” wrote Adelson in a 2019 op-ed. “That this has not been the case (so far — the 2020 election still beckons) is an oddity that will long be pondered by historians. Scholars of the Bible will no doubt note the heroes, sages and prophets of antiquity who were similarly spurned by the very people they came to raise up.”

In an era in which money in politics is a core component of political news and coverage, the courtship of Miriam Adelson is a closely followed component of the political horse race, with pundits and journalists reporting on the outsized role she is likely to play in the 2022 and 2024 elections.

But unlike most reporting on money in politics that suggests a quid-pro-quo between megadonors and their recipients, the media, at least thus-far, continues to largely ignore the Adelsons’ actual influence and motivations for political engagement.

If one listens to Miriam Adelson, it’s clear what motivates her outsized political giving: pursuit of a hawkish U.S. foreign policy in lockstep with Israel’s far-right and largely in opposition to any Israeli concessions as part of a peace process with Palestinians and Republican opposition to any nuclear deal with Iran.

But news coverage of the Republican Party’s biggest donor is superficial, at best, and negligent journalism at worst.

Put another way, the “Five Ws” of journalism are “who,” what,” “when,” “where,” and “why.”

As the richest Israeli, with outspoken foreign policy views, stands ready to become the biggest standalone funder of one of the two U.S. political parties, journalists seem to be avoiding the question of “why?”


Photos: lev radin and Gino Santa Maria via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Reporting | Media
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.