Follow us on social

google cta
Trump MBS

Trump courts Saudi at the risk of US, Middle East security

The Crown Prince will be getting the royal treatment at the White House on Tuesday and we all have to ask, why?

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

As Washington prepares for a visit this week to the White House by Saudi Arabia’s de facto leader, Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS), reports indicate that it could be the occasion for the announcement of a U.S.-Saudi security pact, along the lines of a recent security commitment announced by President Trump for Saudi Arabia’s one-time regional rival, Qatar.

The Qatar agreement commits the United States to take “all lawful and appropriate measures — including diplomatic, economic, and, if necessary, military — to defend the interests of the United States and of the State of Qatar and to restore peace and stability.”

Although this kind of deal would not be the Senate-confirmed legally binding treaty that MBS had previously wanted, if extended to Saudi Arabia, it would still be a uniquely bad idea. Given MBS’s history of reckless behavior — for example violations of the laws of war and systematic human rights abuses — a pact committing Washington to come to Riyadh’s defense would be bad for U.S. interests, regional security, and the people of Saudi Arabia.

From his leadership of Saudi Arabia’s brutal intervention in Yemen, which left nearly 400,000 people dead through direct and indirect means, to his kidnapping of the prime minister of Lebanon, his years-long blockade of Qatar, and his directing the murder of U.S.-resident and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, MBS has been a force for instability and rights abuses, and will not be a reliable partner.

Although Saudi Arabia is not currently engaged in an active conflict outside of its borders, thanks in large part to U.S. pressure, that may be temporary. In fact, providing such a security guarantee risks emboldening MBS to resume his foreign policy recklessness, just as former President Biden’s visit to Saudi Arabia in 2022 emboldened MBS’s resurgent domestic repression.

Following Biden’s visit, MBS’s regime went on an unprecedented campaign of handing down decades-long sentences to Saudis merely for expressing their views, including a woman who was sentenced to 45-years in prison and a subsequent 45-year travel ban.

Saudi security forces have also carried out mass killings of migrants at its southern border. And for the second straight year, the Saudi government has executed more than 300 people and is on pace to break the record number of executions it set last year. These include journalist Turki al-Jasser, two individuals convicted of crimes committed when they were children, nearly half convicted of non-violent drug offenses, and 56% who are foreigners.

In his first term, Donald Trump chose to make his first official visit to Saudi Arabia, where he announced an enormous $110 billion arms sales package. The size of the deal was inflated for publicity purposes, but it served its purpose, allowing Trump to tout his skills as a master deal maker. Similarly, his first trip abroad in his second term was to Saudi Arabia, and the administration claimed to secure $600 billion in investment commitments from the Kingdom, including $142 billion in undisclosed arms sales. Recent reporting indicates that the F-35 combat aircraft may be a part of this deal. So far F-35s have not been sold to any country in the region other than Israel.

Trump protected MBS for his role in Khashoggi’s murder during his first term, including refusing to release a congressionally mandated intelligence report assessing the crown prince’s responsibility, stating that he didn’t want to lose business for “our great defense contractors.” This narrow definition of U.S. interests is precisely the kind of logic that has tied the United States to repressive regimes that entangle Washington in unnecessary wars.

The economic ties between Trump’s family and the Saudi regime raise even more questions about Trump’s potential decision to extend a security pact to Saudi Arabia. The crown prince’s sovereign wealth fund provided $2 billion for Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner’s investment firm at the end of the first term, over the objections of the fund’s board members. And other deals are in the works, including possibly a Trump Tower and a golf course in Saudi Arabia, LIV Golf tournaments at Trump properties, and a partnership for the largest buyout ever of EA Sports for $55 billion.

Instead of tying the United States to the fate of the current Saudi government, President Trump should press MBS to release all political prisoners and make the necessary rights reforms that help Americans, including reuniting American families with their loved ones wrongfully detained in Saudi Arabia, such as Saad Almadi, Abdulrahman al-Sadhan, Salman al-Odah, and Sarah and Omar al-Jabri.

The last thing the United States needs is another commitment that could lead to the U.S. being dragged into yet another war in the Middle East. Doing business with Saudi Arabia is one thing. Committing to defend it is another. It’s time for Congress to speak out against a possible new security pact with Saudi Arabia, and to scrutinize any proposed arms sales to Riyadh.

Uncritically continuing to uplift MBS will only embolden the crown prince’s recklessness and repression and risk perpetuating conflict in the region instead of bringing the peace Trump claims to want. It’s the wrong deal at the wrong time.


Top image credit: President Donald Trump participates in a coffee ceremony with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Al Saud at the Royal Court Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Tuesday, May 13, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Africa construction development
Top photo credit: Construction site in Johannesburg, South Africa, 2024. (Shutterstock/ Wirestock Creators)

US capital investments for something other than beating China

Africa

Among the many elements of the draft National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) currently being debated in Congress is an amendment that would reauthorize the Development Finance Corporation (DFC). What it might look like coming out of the Republican-dominated Congress should be of interest for anyone watching the current direction of foreign policy under the Trump Administration.

In contrast with America’s other major development agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which the administration has largely dismantled, President Donald Trump has expressed support for a reauthorized DFC but wants to broaden the agency’s mandate so that it focuses less on investing in traditional development projects and more on linking investment to national security priorities.

keep readingShow less
USS Lafayette (FFG 65) Constellation-class
Top image credit: Graphic rendering of the future USS Lafayette (FFG 65), the fourth of the new Constellation-class frigates, scheduled to commission in 2029. The Constellation-class guided-missile frigate represents the Navy’s next generation small surface combatant. VIA US NAVY

The US Navy just lit another $9 billion on fire

Military Industrial Complex

The United States Navy has a storied combat record at sea, but the service hasn’t had a successful shipbuilding program in decades. John Phelan, the secretary of the Navy, announced the latest shipbuilding failure by canceling the Constellation-class program on a November 25.

The Constellation program was supposed to produce 20 frigates to serve as small surface combatant ships to support the rest of the fleet and be able to conduct independent patrols. In an effort to reduce development risks and avoid fielding delays that often accompany entirely new designs, Navy officials decided to use an already proven parent design they could modify to meet the Navy’s needs. They selected the European multi-purpose frigate design employed by the French and Italian navies.

keep readingShow less
Who's behind push to designate Muslim Brotherhood a terror group?

Who's behind push to designate Muslim Brotherhood a terror group?

Washington Politics

It all happened in a flash.

Two weeks ago, Texas announced that it was designating the Muslim Brotherhood and a prominent American Muslim group as foreign terror organizations. President Donald Trump followed suit last week, ordering his administration to consider sanctioning Muslim Brotherhood chapters in Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.