Follow us on social

Trump Mohammed Bin Salman al Saud

Weapons industry cheers as Trump inks Saudi $142B arms deal

Riyadh lands ‘largest defense sales agreement in history’

Reporting | QiOSK

Trump has signed a record breaking foreign arms sale to Saudi Arabia — a package worth nearly $142 billion, which the Trump administration describes as "the largest defense sales agreement in history.”

The White House fact sheet on the deal states the deal will provide Saudi Arabia “with state-of-the-art warfighting equipment and services from over a dozen U.S. defense firms.” Relevant sales from the private sector will occur in the realms of air force and space advancements, air and missile defense, border and coastal security, and communications upgrades.

Signed during his trip to the Kingdom today, the deal is part of a $600 billion Saudi commercial investment package previously floated in January and is directed especially toward American infrastructure, energy, and AI.

“The United States and Saudi Arabia celebrate these and many other deals today as a result of the growing momentum of the last four months. The total package has quickly built to more than $600 billion —the largest set of commercial agreements on record between the two countries,” today’s fact sheet proclaimed.

"The U.S.-Saudi relationship has been a bedrock of security and prosperity," Mr. Trump affirmed today in Riyadh. "Today, we reaffirmed this important bond, and we take the next steps to make our relationship closer, stronger and more powerful than ever before."

But experts wonder how the agreements will shake out. “Although the Saudis allegedly agreed to the largest defense sales agreement in history, similar to the massive amounts of weapons that MBS [Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud] agreed to purchase during Trump's first term, many of these initial commitments may not actually translate into weapons purchases,” Annelle Sheline, Research Fellow in the Middle East program at the Quincy Institute, told Responsible Statecraft.

Indeed, Trump made an arms deal to Saudi Arabia worth $110 billion in 2017 during his previous presidency; in 2018, CNN reported Saudi Arabia had only followed through with about $14.5 billion worth of arms purchases.

Sources told Reuters that the U.S. and Riyadh also discussed Saudi Arabia potentially purchasing advanced F-35 jets from Lockheed Martin. Yet it wasn’t clear whether Washington would permit the purchase, as it would give Riyadh a weapon also used by Israel, which the U.S. has guaranteed more advanced American weapons over its Arab counterparts (otherwise known as the Qualitative Military Edge).

Trump’s arms sale deal was proclaimed in tandem with other major U.S. announcements, including the decision to lift sanctions on the new Syrian government. Trump also expressed hope Saudi Arabia would join the Abraham accords at Riyadh today.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, has publicly floated renaming the Persian Gulf the “Arabian Gulf,” a move likely to please the Saudis he’s making deals with — but likely to upset Iran during tense negotiations regarding its nuclear program.


U.S. President Donald Trump reacts next to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman during the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, May 13, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder [Reuters Connect]
Reporting | QiOSK
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo), Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.)  Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.)
Top Image Credit: Top photo credit: Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo) (Gage Skidmore/Flickr); Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.)(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect); Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.)(Gage Skidmore/Creative Commons)

The Capitol Hill Republicans against US war with Iran

Washington Politics

Even as polling indicates that a majority of Trump voters don't want to go to war with Iran on behalf of Israel, it’s been difficult to change GOP minds on Capitol Hill.

But that doesn’t mean there aren’t strong conservative voices trying to do just that.

keep readingShow less
Nato-scaled
Official Opening Ceremony for NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Summit 2018 in Brussels, Belgium. (Shutterstock/ Gints Ivuskans)
Official Opening Ceremony for NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Summit 2018 in Brussels, Belgium. (Shutterstock/ Gints Ivuskans)

The 17 Ukraine war peace terms the US must put before NATO

Europe

In the run up to the NATO Summit at The Hague next week, June 24-25, President Donald Trump and his administration should present a clear U.S. plan for peace in Ukraine to the European and Ukrainian governments — one that goes well beyond just a ceasefire.

While it is understandable that Trump would like to walk away from the Ukraine peace process, given President Vladimir Putin’s intransigence and now the new war in the Middle East, he and his team need to state clearly the parameters of a deal that they think will bring a lasting peace. Walking away from the effort to end the war prematurely leaves Washington in continued danger of being drawn into a new crisis as long as the U.S. continues to supply Ukraine with weapons and intelligence.

keep readingShow less
Benjamin Netanyahu Donald Trump
Benjamin Netanyahu Donald Trump at the White House in April 2025 (White House/Flickr)

Israel is luring the US into a trap

Middle East

Joining in Israel’s aggression against Iran would hurt, not advance, U.S. interests and international security.

This should not be surprising, given that support for U.S. interests and international security was not what led to Israel’s launching of the war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argues that Iran’s nuclear program poses a threat to America and not just Israel, but the nuclear issue was not the main motivation behind Israel’s attack, as reflected in a target list that goes far beyond anything associated with Iran’s nuclear program.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.