Follow us on social

google cta
Larry Ellison Tik Tok Israel

From CBS to TikTok, Pro-Israel Ellisons now in the driver's seat

Sale of the social media giant finally sealed, with Oracle on the board and with 15% share

QiOSK
google cta
google cta

There were two campaigns driving the ultimate sale of TikTok today. One featured claims that the Chinese government was using the wildly popular social media app as a back door to Americans' personal data and was a national security threat. The second: that it was propagating anti-Israel messaging in regards to the Gaza war among millions of young people, especially Americans.

As former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton famously said of her reportedly wrongheaded Columbia University students just a few months ago, "They were getting their information from social media, particularly TikTok...That is where they were learning about what happened on October 7th, what happened in the, you know, days, weeks, and months to follow. That’s a serious problem."

Well that might not be a problem anymore. There are new owners of TikTok in town, and a majority chunk are the kind that if they have their druthers, won't let that kind of "information" — what did Sarah Hurwitz say, the "wall of dead children"? — continue to flow in the same way.

Last night the Chinese owner of ByteDance said it had struck a deal with a consortium of investors in which ByteDance will now have less than a 20% stake in the app going forward. The deal was a mandate: Congress had passed a law last year that said TikTok could no longer be majority owned by a company linked to the Chinese government. So 80% will be owned by investors including software giant Oracle (co-founder is Larry Ellison); MGX, an Emirati investment firm; and Silver Lake, another investment firm. They will each have a 15% stake.

Ellison, as I wrote here, is the single biggest private investor in the Friends of the IDF (Israeli Defense Forces), and a major Republican donor. He has referred to the state of Israel as his own. He and his son David Ellison own and control a head spinning galaxy of news, television, and Hollywood media companies, mainly through the recent Paramount Skydance Corporation takeover. Ellison the younger just gave Free Press founder Bari Weiss, a pro-Zionist activist, control of newly-acquired CBS. Ellison the elder also is a major stakeholder in X and Tesla.

It is not clear yet that other pro-Israel figures, including Oracle Vice Executive Chair and former CEO Safra Catz (who traveled to Israel on behalf of the company several times in the last two years to ensure it fidelity to Israel's cause), Fox News mogul Rupert Murdoch (who once said Israel is "alone on the front line of Western democratic civilization") or Republican mega-donor Jeff Yass who has funding ties to IDF and AIPAC, are included in the roster of investors, as reported earlier.

It is also not clear how and when the content users will see will changes, as the algorithm is reportedly staying in ByteDance's control with leasing rights to the new investors. Analysts also question whether "national security" concerns will be placated with the sale as well.

But for all of us watching how Israel has been behaving over the last year: paying influencers enormous sums, messing with Chat GPT, training Evangelical pastors to be their "ambassadors" in the U.S., this is yet another, albeit, powerful tool to control what we hear and see of their policies in Gaza and in the West Bank. This isn't paranoia. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said it himself, that social media is “the most important weapon … to secure our base in the U.S." and TikTok was “the most important purchase going on right now,” with its control "consequential."

No doubt the Ellisons and Hillary Clinton feel the same way today.


Top photo credit: Larry Ellison (hartmann Studios/flikr) ; Shutterstock
Israel wins TikTok
google cta
QiOSK
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
After shuttering USAID, Trump launches new foreign aid strategy
Top photo credit: Abuja, Nigeria, March 06, 2021: African Medical Doctor giving consultation and treatment in a rural clinic. (Shutterstock/Oni Abimbola)

After shuttering USAID, Trump launches new foreign aid strategy

Washington Politics

Almost exactly one year ago, the swift dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) got underway with a public statement issued by the State Department.

At the start of July 2025, the State Department officially absorbed what was left of the storied agency. A few short months later, to fill the USAID-shaped hole in America’s soft-power projection abroad, the Trump administration launched an $11 billion plan to provide foreign health assistance.

keep readingShow less
What happens when we give Europe first dibs on US missiles for war
Top photo credit: Volodymyr Selenskyj (l), President of Ukraine, and Boris Pistorius (SPD), Federal Minister of Defense, answer media questions after a visit to the training of soldiers on the "Patriot" air defence missile system at a military training area. The international reconstruction conference for Ukraine takes place on June 11 and 12. (Jens Büttner/dpa via Reuters Connect)

What happens when we give Europe first dibs on US missiles for war

Military Industrial Complex

For weeks the question animating the Washington D.C. commentariat has been this: When will President Donald Trump make good on his threat and launch a second round of airstrikes on Iran? So far at least, the answer is “not yet.”

Many explanations for Trump’s surprising (but very welcome) restraint have emerged. Among the most troubling, however, is that it is a lack of the necessary munitions, and in particular air defense interceptors, that is giving Trump second thoughts. “The missile defense cupboard is bare,” one report concludes based on interviews with current and former U.S. defense officials.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.