Follow us on social

google cta
Container Terminal Durban South Africa

‘Duty free’ Africa trade deal extended — for now

AGOA’s short-term renewal is sparking debates about its future as tariffs bite

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Included in the massive $1.2 trillion spending package signed by President Trump yesterday is a provision for the short-term renewal of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). AGOA, which first became law in the waning days of President Bill Clinton’s final term in office in 2000, provides duty-free access to the U.S. market for over 1,800 goods exported to the U.S. from countries across sub-Saharan Africa.

AGOA’s short-term renewal caps a topsy-turvy period for the preferential trade agreement. Many Africa watchers assumed in the early months of Trump’s second term that the trade agreement — which, before yesterday, had last been renewed in 2015 — would expire at the end of September without any effort by the administration to renew it.

This view was largely derived from the fact that AGOA seems to contrast with Trump’s wider trade policy of trying to get other countries to reduce their barriers of entry for American goods. The act only explicitly eliminates tariffs on goods exported from sub-Saharan Africa to the United States, not for goods being exported from the United States to sub-Saharan countries. Trump has long stated his desire to end asymmetric trade agreements by increasing American barriers to entry while forcing other countries to reduce their trade barriers for American-exported products.

Yet, in the days before AGOA’s expiration, Trump surprised much of the policy world by coming out in favor of its one-year renewal while negotiations take place over the details of its long-term future.

After its expiration in September, two competing bills were presented in Congress for its short-term reauthorization. The first was presented by Senator John Kennedy (R-La.), which would have renewed the agreement for two years through 2027. A second bill was presented in December by Representative Jason Smith (R-Mo.), which would have extended the agreement temporarily through the end of 2028.

Though quite similar, one of the key differences between the two bills is that Kennedy’s included a forced review of the bilateral U.S.-South Africa relationship. This came after last year’s public scuffle between President Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. During the argument, Trump accused the South African government of expropriating land from white South Africans without fair compensation. Also, there being no evidence of this, Trump accused the South African government of failing to stop a genocide against the country’s white population.

The AGOA renewal signed into law yesterday does not include a mandated review of the U.S.-South Africa relationship.

Although Smith’s three-year renewal bill passed the House of Representatives on January 12, it stalled in the Senate as Trump’s team reiterated their request to Congress for a one-year, rather than a three-year, AGOA renewal. In line with this request, a provision was added to the spending bill that would extend AGOA just through the end of 2026. It provides retroactive benefits for AGOA-eligible goods that were exported from sub-Saharan countries to the United States during the period between AGOA’s expiration in September and before the start of the new year.

With AGOA’s short-term reauthorization official, debates over its long-term future will now kick into gear.

A question that is certain to come up has to do with whether AGOA-eligible countries should be immune from Trump’s broader tariff policy. As it currently stands, AGOA’s breadth has been hobbled by the sweeping tariffs Trump has placed on countries across the world, including many that would otherwise receive duty-free access to the American market through AGOA. Thirteen of the 30 countries currently eligible to receive AGOA benefits face tariffs of 15%, while South Africa faces a 30% tariff on its exports to the United States. These duties supersede AGOA’s preferential trade benefits, meaning that AGOA is essentially defunct for countries forced to contend with these tariffs.

Another piece of the broader debate over AGOA’s long-term renewal will center on whether the next iteration of the act will provide American exporters some sort of preferential trade benefits to the sub-Saharan market. Trump has long blamed one-sided preferential trade agreements for hurting America’s trade balance. The president argues that a reduction in barriers for American exporters will benefit American industry — and thus Americans working for firms selling to foreign customers — by increasing exports and leading to a fairer trade regime that rebalances American trade.

In line with this thinking, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said, “AGOA for the 21st century must demand more from our trading partners and yield more market access for U.S. businesses, farmers, and ranchers.”


Top Image Credit: A general view of the Container Terminal at the port in Durban, South Africa, April 10, 2025. REUTERS/Rogan Ward [Reuters Connect]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
G7 Summit
Top photo credit: May 21, 2023, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan: (From R to L) Comoros' President Azali Assoumani, World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan. (Credit Image: © POOL via ZUMA Press Wire)

Middle Powers are setting the table so they won't be 'on the menu'

Asia-Pacific

The global order was already fragmenting before Donald Trump returned to the White House. But the upended “rules” of global economic and foreign policies have now reached a point of no return.

What has changed is not direction, but speed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s remarks in Davos last month — “Middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu” — captured the consequences of not acting quickly. And Carney is not alone in those fears.

keep readingShow less
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.