Follow us on social

Benjamin Netanyahu

Another poll shows Americans’ declining support for Israel

And their favorability of Netanyahu is abysmally low

Reporting | QiOSK

The percentage of registered American voters who believe that support for Israel serves the U.S. national interest has fallen sharply over the last 21 months of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, according to the findings of a new survey released by the Quinnipiac University Poll.

Less than half of American voters — 47% — say they believe that support for Israel is in the national interest of the United States, according to the survey, which was based on the responses of 1,276 self-identified registered voters September 18–21.

That was down from 69% in December 2023, three-and-a-half months after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel that launched the war.

Forty-one percent of the survey’s respondents said they believed U.S. support for Israel does not serve the national interest. The remainder offered no opinion.

Opinions of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were even more negative. Only 21% of respondents said they had a favorable opinion of Netanyahu, who is scheduled to address the U.N. General Assembly Friday. Nearly half — 49% — said they held an unfavorable view of the Israeli leader, while 31% either refused to answer (3%) or hadn’t hear enough to offer an opinion (28%).

The survey also found nearly as strong disapproval of “the way (President) Donald Trump is handling the Israel-Hamas conflict.” Only 31% of respondents said they approved of his handling of the war, which has been characterized by virtually unconditional U.S. support for Netanyahu. A solid majority of respondents (56%) said they disapproved.

In a survey released August 27, a separate Quinnipiac poll found that no less than 50% of respondents, including one of five self-identified Republican voters, said they believed that Israel was committing a genocide in Gaza.

Meanwhile, significantly more voters, according to the latest survey, believe that supporting Ukraine serves U.S. national interests than those who believe that supporting Israel does. Nearly two in three voters (64%), including 50% of self-identified Republicans, said they believe that supporting Ukraine serves U.S. interests, while only one if four (26%) said they believe U.S. support for Kyiv did not serve the national interest.

One in three respondents (33%), and only 3% of self-identified Democrats, said they approved of Trump’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, while 56%, including 14% of Republicans, voiced disapproval.

The poll’s findings on Israel are consistent with other recent surveys that show unprecedented declines in support for Israel.

A poll released last month by the University of Maryland’s Critical Issues series found for the first time in a national poll that more Americans sympathized with Palestinians (28%) than with Israelis (22%). It also found that 41% of its respondents believed that Israel was committing a genocide or a campaign “akin to genocide” in Gaza.

A Gallup poll released in late July found that public support for Israel’s actions in Gaza had fallen from 50% to 32% over 17 months. It found that support for Israel had hemorrhaged among younger voters, Democrats and self-identified Independents.

The latest Quinnipiac poll found significant differences in views about support for Israel serving U.S. national interests. Three of every four self-identified Republicans said they believe that support for Israel serves U.S. interests, while only 36% of Democrats and 37% of Independents agreed.

Remarkably, more Independents (53%) than Democrats (49%) said they believed support for Israel did not serve U.S. national interests. Nearly one in five Republicans (19%) agreed.

Republicans were also significantly disposed to view Netanyahu favorably (47%), while only 4% of Democrats and 14% agreed. Seven out of ten Democrats (70%) and nearly six of ten (58%) of Independents said they viewed him unfavorably as did one in five (20%) of Republicans.


Top image credti: Gil Cohen Magen / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | QiOSK
David Milstein
Top image credit: David Milstein speaks during a panel at the 2024 Conservative Political Action Conference. (Screengrab via C-SPAN)

How a little-known embassy aide hijacked US Israel policy

Washington Politics

In late spring of this year, American diplomats in Jerusalem drafted an urgent cable. The war in Gaza, coupled with Israel’s decision in March to block all forms of aid from entering the strip, had left the region on the brink of disaster. A famine was looming, and the U.S. wasn’t doing anything about it.

But that cable never got back to Washington. In fact, it’s not clear whether it even reached the desk of Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel. In its place, David Milstein — a senior adviser to Huckabee — sent a cable that sounded like “an advertisement for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation,” according to two State Department officials with knowledge of the incident.

keep readingShow less
Proposed war authorization could allow Trump to target 60+ countries
Top image credit: Countries which the US government could militarily intervene in under a potential Authorization ofMilitary Force against 'narco-terrorists.' Via Brett Heinz

Proposed war authorization could allow Trump to target 60+ countries

Global Crises

A draft proposal to authorize the use of U.S. military force against drug cartels is currently floating around Congress and the White House, according to a recent New York Times report. Although an official version of the proposal has yet to be released, publicly available information suggests that it could be used to justify U.S. military intervention in at least 60 countries.

The U.S.-led “War on Drugs” has escalated rapidly over the last month: after the White House signed a secret directive authorizing attacks on Latin American drug cartels, the U.S. built up its military presence in the region and began conducting a series of deadly airstrikes on alleged drug-smuggling civilian boats in the international waters of the Caribbean. Human Rights Watch called the strikes “unlawful extrajudicial killings.”

keep readingShow less
Keir Starmer
Top image credit: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com

Britain's half-baked national security strategy

Europe

The new British “National Security Strategy” is not really a strategy at all, but a mess of conflicting (and often fantastical) goals and unexamined assumptions.

For this, two things above all are responsible. The first is the unexamined tension between, on the one hand, the strategy’s promise of a “systematic approach to pursuing national interests,” and, on the other, the repeated assertion that these interests are totally and inextricably bound up with Britain’s alliances. For it should be clear by now that “allies” cannot necessarily be relied on, and that in certain circumstances the agendas of allies are not a security asset but rather a source of greatly increased danger to Britain.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.