Follow us on social

Gaza Khan Younis famine

Poll: 41% of Americans say Israel committing genocidal acts in Gaza

For the first time more respondents sympathize with Palestinians, while only 22% say Jerusalem's war is justified 'under the right to self-defense'

Reporting | Middle East

Forty-one percent of Americans, including 67% of Democrats and 14% of Republicans, believe that Israeli military actions in Gaza constitute either “genocide” (22%) or are "akin to genocide" (19%), according to a new poll released Monday by the University of Maryland Critical Issues series.

Confirming a growing trend, younger respondents of both parties were more likely to say that Israel’s actions constitute genocide or the like.

The poll, which surveyed more than 1,500 adults 18 and older between July 29 and August 7, found that only 22% of respondents said that Israel’s war in Gaza constituted “justified actions under the right to self-defense,” the public explanation by the Israeli government headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Those included a mere 7% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans. A total of 23% of all respondents said they didn’t know.

Moreover, more than six in ten (61%) of respondents said that U.S. military, economic, and diplomatic support for Israel has enabled that country’s military actions, compared to 12% who said such assistance either has no impact (12%) or only marginal impact (10%) with the remaining 26% saying they didn’t know.

The view that Washington’s support has enabled Israeli actions in Gaza was transpartisan. Nearly three out of four Democrats (72%) agreed with that proposition, as did 57% of Republicans, and 63% of self-identified independents.

The survey was released amid growing international criticism of the Israel’s war, which is likely to intensify in the wake of Monday’s strike by Israel on a hospital in southern Gaza that reportedly killed 20 people, including five journalists bringing the total number of Palestinian journalists killed over the last 22 months to 189, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists.

The poll, the latest in a series dating back more than a decade by the University of Maryland, found that more Americans express sympathy for the Palestinians (28%) than with Israelis (22%), while 26% of respondents said they sympathize with both equally, and the remaining 25% aid they either sympathized with neither party (12%) or they didn’t know (13%).

Support for Palestinians was higher among respondents between 18 and 34 years old; 37% of that demographic said they sympathize more with the Palestinians compared to 11% who said they sympathize more with Israel. The gap between older and younger Republicans was particularly deep, according to Shibley Telhami, the Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland, who has overseen the Critical Issues program.

“The change taking place among young Republicans is breathtaking,” he told RS via email. “While 52% of older republicans (35+) sympathize more with Israel, only 24% of younger Republicans (18-34) say the same — fewer than half.”

He also stressed that, while recent polls, including by Gallup and the Pew Research Center, have shown increasing sympathy for Palestinians, “this is the first time it is found that more Americans overall sympathize more with Palestinians than Israelis.”

Four out of ten respondents, including 63% of Democrats and 45% of independents, said the Trump administration’s policy toward Israel-Palestine is “too pro-Israel,” compared to only 3% who said it’s “too pro-Palestinian.” Another 27% said it was “about right,” and 30% said they “don’t know.” While a majority (57%) of Republicans said it was “about right,” more than one if five Republicans (21%) said it was “too pro-Israel.”

On the genocide/self-defense question, the survey found a large gap between younger and older Republicans, with 52% of the latter saying Israeli actions were justified, but only 22% of self-identified Republicans under 35 agreed with that assessment.

Significantly more respondents said that Israeli actions constituted genocide or were “akin to genocide” than a year ago when the University of Maryland series first posed the question. The percentage who agreed with the genocide proposition grew from 23 percent to 41 percent. The movement among Democrats was particularly significant — from 38% who agreed with the proposition one year ago to 67% in the latest poll.

Asked to assess whether current U.S. policy in the region “advances American interests,” only one third of all respondents responded positively, while 25% said “it mostly advances Israeli interests” and 6% said “it mostly advances interests of Arab states.”

Remarkably, more younger Republicans (26%) said U.S. policy mostly advances Israeli interests than said it mostly advances U.S. interests (24%).


Top photo credit: Internally displaced elderly Palestinian man Salim Asfour, enters his family's tent in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, 04 August 2025. Photo by Moaz Abu Taha apaima / IMAGO Images.
Reporting | Middle East
Rand Paul Donald Trump
Top photo credit: Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) (Shutterstock/Mark Reinstein) and President Trump (White House/Molly Riley)

Rand Paul to Trump: Don't 'abandon' MAGA over Maduro regime change

Washington Politics

Sen. Rand Paul said on Friday that “all hell could break loose” within Donald Trump’s MAGA coalition if the president involves the U.S. further in Ukraine, and added that his supporters who voted for him after 20 years of regime change wars would "feel abandoned" if he went to war and tried to topple Nicolas Maduro, too.

President Trump has been getting criticism from some of his supporters for vowing to release the files of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and then reneging on that promise. Paul said that the Epstein heat Trump is getting from MAGA will be nothing compared to if he refuses to live up to his “America First” foreign policy promises.

keep reading Show less
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep reading Show less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep reading Show less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.