Follow us on social

google cta
Mike Huckabee

Is Huckabee too ‘extreme’ to be US ambassador to Israel?

Lawmakers: could the self-described 'unapologetic, unreformed Zionist' navigate today's rocky diplomatic waters on behalf of the United States?

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Former Arkansas Governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, who has advocated for Israel’s annexation of the West Bank and describes himself as an “unapologetic, unreformed Zionist,” was grilled by members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about whether his staunch pro-Israel personal views would compromise his work representing the United States government in Jerusalem.

Huckabee’s confirmation for U.S. ambassador comes amid a broken ceasefire and a renewed Israeli bombing campaign and ground incursion in Gaza — all with the support of the Trump administration, according to recent interviews by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff.

Huckabee emphasized during the hearing that the president’s views would be prioritized in his new role if confirmed. “I am not here to articulate or defend my own views or policies, but to present myself as one who will respect and represent the President whose overwhelming election by the people will hopefully give me the honor of serving as ambassador to the State of Israel,” Huckabee declared in his opening statement.

Some senators present, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas), were pleased by Huckabee’s nomination, especially in light of his career-long pro-Israel stance. “You’re going to do a fantastic job, and I’m very happy to see your name for this position,” Cruz said.

Senators Jeff Merkley (D-Or.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), in contrast, were the most critical.

A “concern that I've had [regarding the war on Gaza] is the use of humanitarian supplies as [political] leverage, in which they've been restricted time, time, and again under international law. This is generally considered an illegitimate strategy of war,” said Sen. Merkley. “Have you had any concerns at all about Israel restricting the supplies of food to Gaza?”

Huckabee’s response was that Israel “provided 700 trucks a day,” and that “there have been massive supplies,” to Gaza. While about 600 aid trucks were going to Gaza daily during much of the ceasefire, Israel had again cut all humanitarian aid off to the strip in early March, subsequently breaking the ceasefire wholesale on March 18.

“There's been extended periods where very few trucks at all have gotten in. And certainly we did have relief during the ceasefire, but we're now in a new phase of extremely restricted supplies,” Merkley parried, rejecting Huckabee’s assertions outright. “There’s been many, many international organizations that have reported on this, so I know you’re not unaware of it.”

Merkley pressed Huckabee about Trump’s repeatedly stated plan to move Palestinians out of Gaza. Huckabee in turn denied Trump wanted to displace Gazans. “The president has never said that. He has never spoken about forced displacement.”

While Trump and his officials have occasionally walked back suggestions that Palestinians be permanently displaced, Trump has consistently asserted that Gazans must leave the strip entirely for his “Riviera” plan to work. At one point, he even suggested Palestinians could choose whether to leave, but any departures would be permanent.

Senator Chris Van Hollen asked Huckabee if he believed in the collective punishment of the Palestinian people, which he suggested Israel was carrying out. Huckabee said he did not.

“[Israeli] Finance Minister Smotrich suggested [that] it might be justified and moral to starve two million Palestinians in Gaza as part of a strategy [regarding] the hostages. Simple question: do you disagree with Finance Minister Smotrich?” Dodging the question, Huckabee responded that “an ambassador doesn't get to argue with the people of the country,” and that his role would be to represent Trump’s views.

Van Hollen also asked Huckabee about his support for the West Bank annexation by Israel. "I have previously supported it. Yes, sir. But it would not be my prerogative to make that the policy of the president,” Huckabee replied.

Huckabee has previously called for the West Bank to be referred to as “Judea and Samaria,” which is how Israel’s Likud party, long committed to the West Bank’s annexation, refers to the Israeli-occupied territory. U.S. Lawmakers have proposed the same name change in congressional legislation. Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Brian Mast has even instructed GOP committee staffers to comply with it.

Huckabee did not clarify whether he stood by the position when pressed by Van Hollen.

At the hearing, Huckabee also expressed support for Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, saying "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and it is better to bankrupt them than it is to bomb them.”

Other lawmakers and groups have opposed Huckabee’s nomination, describing his Israel positions as too extreme. In addition to claiming that “there’s plenty of land” for Palestinians to go to in other Middle Eastern countries, Huckabee has said “there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian” during his own unsuccessful presidential campaign.

“Huckabee’s positions are not the words of a thoughtful diplomat — they are the words of a provocateur whose views are far outside international consensus and contrary to the core bipartisan principles of American diplomacy,” Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who is Jewish, said in a Monday statement ahead of the hearing. “There is no need for more extremism, and certainly not from the historic ambassador’s post and behind the powerful seal of the United States.”


Top Image Credit: LIVE: Mike Huckabee's confirmation hearing to be ambassador to Israel - Associated Press (YouTube/screenshot)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Senior US official resigns in protest of Iran war
Shutterstock/Ben Von Klemperer

Senior US official resigns in protest of Iran war

QiOSK

The intra-GOP debate over the Iran war has now reached inside the Trump administration, triggering the first senior-level resignation over the conflict.

Joe Kent, a former U.S. Army officer, resigned Tuesday from his position as the director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), saying in a letter that he could no longer “in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran.” Kent focused his blame on “high-ranking Israeli officials and influential members of the American media” for leading President Donald Trump down this dangerous path and deceiving him into believing that Iran posed an imminent threat and that a war could be won quickly and easily.

keep readingShow less
Iran Us airstrikes
Top photo credit: An Iranian couple carries a national flag as they walk past a police facility that is destroyed in an attack during a rally commemorating International Quds Day, also known as Jerusalem Day, in Tehran, Iran, on March 13, 2026, amid the U.S.-Israeli military campaign. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)
Trump's capture of Maduro and the rise of 'global mafia politics'

Trump's ill-fated attempt to copy Israel's 'mowing the grass' strategy

Global Crises

Two weeks into the Iran War, the Trump Administration remains mired in a conflict without a clear casus belli and without an articulated end state. President Donald Trump’s latest extra-constitutional use of military force is but the latest in an alarming trend: the Trump administration believes it has solved the “forever war” trap by attempting to divorce war from discrete political objectives.

Trump and his allies appear to have decided that, by blowing things up without a clear political end state in mind, they can advance U.S. geopolitical interests while avoiding a quagmire. In practice, this is little more than a global version of Israel’s “mowing the grass” strategy, in which periodic military campaigns substitute for political strategy. Now, this notion of war without politics is dragging the U.S. even deeper into the messy business of Middle Eastern affairs.

keep readingShow less
‘Water War’ rages as India-Pakistan tensions reach boiling point
Top image credit: A view of Ranjit Sagar Dam (Thein Dam), which is near the proposed site of the Shahpur Kandi Dam. (Shutterstock/mrinalpal)

A view of Ranjit Sagar Dam (Thein Dam), which is near the proposed site of the Shahpur Kandi Dam. (Shutterstock/mrinalpal)

‘Water War’ rages as India-Pakistan tensions reach boiling point

Global Crises

Last week, water became a focal point in the Iran war, as airstrikes hit desalination plants in Iran and Bahrain. Further east, a slower motion water war was playing out — one that is heightening tensions between two nuclear armed powers.

The Shahpur Kandi Dam project was first conceptualized in the late 1970s. In 1982, former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi laid its foundation stone and set a 1988 deadline for the project. But inter-state conflicts between Punjab, Jammu, and Kashmir stalled construction for decades.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.