Follow us on social

google cta
Mike Huckabee

Is Huckabee too ‘extreme’ to be US ambassador to Israel?

Lawmakers: could the self-described 'unapologetic, unreformed Zionist' navigate today's rocky diplomatic waters on behalf of the United States?

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Former Arkansas Governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, who has advocated for Israel’s annexation of the West Bank and describes himself as an “unapologetic, unreformed Zionist,” was grilled by members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about whether his staunch pro-Israel personal views would compromise his work representing the United States government in Jerusalem.

Huckabee’s confirmation for U.S. ambassador comes amid a broken ceasefire and a renewed Israeli bombing campaign and ground incursion in Gaza — all with the support of the Trump administration, according to recent interviews by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff.

Huckabee emphasized during the hearing that the president’s views would be prioritized in his new role if confirmed. “I am not here to articulate or defend my own views or policies, but to present myself as one who will respect and represent the President whose overwhelming election by the people will hopefully give me the honor of serving as ambassador to the State of Israel,” Huckabee declared in his opening statement.

Some senators present, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas), were pleased by Huckabee’s nomination, especially in light of his career-long pro-Israel stance. “You’re going to do a fantastic job, and I’m very happy to see your name for this position,” Cruz said.

Senators Jeff Merkley (D-Or.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), in contrast, were the most critical.

A “concern that I've had [regarding the war on Gaza] is the use of humanitarian supplies as [political] leverage, in which they've been restricted time, time, and again under international law. This is generally considered an illegitimate strategy of war,” said Sen. Merkley. “Have you had any concerns at all about Israel restricting the supplies of food to Gaza?”

Huckabee’s response was that Israel “provided 700 trucks a day,” and that “there have been massive supplies,” to Gaza. While about 600 aid trucks were going to Gaza daily during much of the ceasefire, Israel had again cut all humanitarian aid off to the strip in early March, subsequently breaking the ceasefire wholesale on March 18.

“There's been extended periods where very few trucks at all have gotten in. And certainly we did have relief during the ceasefire, but we're now in a new phase of extremely restricted supplies,” Merkley parried, rejecting Huckabee’s assertions outright. “There’s been many, many international organizations that have reported on this, so I know you’re not unaware of it.”

Merkley pressed Huckabee about Trump’s repeatedly stated plan to move Palestinians out of Gaza. Huckabee in turn denied Trump wanted to displace Gazans. “The president has never said that. He has never spoken about forced displacement.”

While Trump and his officials have occasionally walked back suggestions that Palestinians be permanently displaced, Trump has consistently asserted that Gazans must leave the strip entirely for his “Riviera” plan to work. At one point, he even suggested Palestinians could choose whether to leave, but any departures would be permanent.

Senator Chris Van Hollen asked Huckabee if he believed in the collective punishment of the Palestinian people, which he suggested Israel was carrying out. Huckabee said he did not.

“[Israeli] Finance Minister Smotrich suggested [that] it might be justified and moral to starve two million Palestinians in Gaza as part of a strategy [regarding] the hostages. Simple question: do you disagree with Finance Minister Smotrich?” Dodging the question, Huckabee responded that “an ambassador doesn't get to argue with the people of the country,” and that his role would be to represent Trump’s views.

Van Hollen also asked Huckabee about his support for the West Bank annexation by Israel. "I have previously supported it. Yes, sir. But it would not be my prerogative to make that the policy of the president,” Huckabee replied.

Huckabee has previously called for the West Bank to be referred to as “Judea and Samaria,” which is how Israel’s Likud party, long committed to the West Bank’s annexation, refers to the Israeli-occupied territory. U.S. Lawmakers have proposed the same name change in congressional legislation. Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Brian Mast has even instructed GOP committee staffers to comply with it.

Huckabee did not clarify whether he stood by the position when pressed by Van Hollen.

At the hearing, Huckabee also expressed support for Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, saying "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and it is better to bankrupt them than it is to bomb them.”

Other lawmakers and groups have opposed Huckabee’s nomination, describing his Israel positions as too extreme. In addition to claiming that “there’s plenty of land” for Palestinians to go to in other Middle Eastern countries, Huckabee has said “there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian” during his own unsuccessful presidential campaign.

“Huckabee’s positions are not the words of a thoughtful diplomat — they are the words of a provocateur whose views are far outside international consensus and contrary to the core bipartisan principles of American diplomacy,” Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who is Jewish, said in a Monday statement ahead of the hearing. “There is no need for more extremism, and certainly not from the historic ambassador’s post and behind the powerful seal of the United States.”


Top Image Credit: LIVE: Mike Huckabee's confirmation hearing to be ambassador to Israel - Associated Press (YouTube/screenshot)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Iran war
Top image credit: Veiled women look at the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps armed personnel during a military rally in downtown Tehran, Iran, on January 10, 2025. The IRGC spokesperson says on Monday, January 6, that the military rally named Rahian-e-Quds (Passengers of Al-Aqsa) includes 110,000 IRGC members. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto) VIA REUTERS CONNECT

What if today's Iran is resigned to a long, hellish war with the US?

Middle East

Trump’s decision in June 2025 to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities in the final days of Israel’s war on Iran removed any lingering doubts about his administration’s willingness to cross the longstanding U.S. red line of directly attacking Iran’s nuclear program.

As a result, every subsequent American military threat, against Iran as well as the rest of the world, was imbued with a credibility that only the precedent of naked aggression can impose. The U.S. military’s abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January only reinforced that credibility.

keep readingShow less
Trump, George w. Bush, Bill Clinton
Top photo credit: President Donald Trump (Trump White House/public domain) ; George W Bush (National Archives/public domain); President Bill Clinton (Clinton presidential library/public domain)

All aboard America's strategic blunder train. Next stop: Iran

Washington Politics

With not just one — but two — carrier battle groups now steaming in circles somewhere off the coast of Oman out of the range of Iranian missiles, we are all left with the head-scratching question: what is it, exactly, that the United States hopes to accomplish with another round of air strikes on Iran? Trump hasn’t told us.

The latest crisis du jour with Iran illustrates the strategic swamp willingly stepped into not just by Donald Trump but his predecessors as well. The swamp is built on a singular and hopelessly misguided assumption: that the use of force either by stand-off, limited strikes from 12,000 feet or even invasions will somehow solve complex political problems on the ground below. The United States today sits shivering, gripped with this runaway swamp fever — with no relief in sight.

keep readingShow less
Tucker Carlson
Top image credit: Tucker Carlson, founder of Tucker Carlson Network, speaks during the AmericaFest 2024 conference sponsored by conservative group Turning Point in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. December 19, 2024. REUTERS/Cheney Orr
Tucker escalates war with neocons over Iran

Are MAGA restrainers pulling their punches this time on Iran?

Washington Politics

The Trump administration appears to be moving closer to a U.S. war with Iran, and there are plenty on the right, including inside MAGA, rallying against it. Unfortunately, they seem much more drowned out this time around.

Marjorie Taylor Greene certainly does her bit. “Americans do not want to go to war with Iran!!!” the former Republican congresswoman shared on X Wednesday. “And they voted for NO MORE FOREIGN WARS AND NO MORE REGIME CHANGE.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.