Follow us on social

Mike Huckabee

Is Huckabee too ‘extreme’ to be US ambassador to Israel?

Lawmakers: could the self-described 'unapologetic, unreformed Zionist' navigate today's rocky diplomatic waters on behalf of the United States?

Analysis | QiOSK

Former Arkansas Governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, who has advocated for Israel’s annexation of the West Bank and describes himself as an “unapologetic, unreformed Zionist,” was grilled by members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about whether his staunch pro-Israel personal views would compromise his work representing the United States government in Jerusalem.

Huckabee’s confirmation for U.S. ambassador comes amid a broken ceasefire and a renewed Israeli bombing campaign and ground incursion in Gaza — all with the support of the Trump administration, according to recent interviews by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff.

Huckabee emphasized during the hearing that the president’s views would be prioritized in his new role if confirmed. “I am not here to articulate or defend my own views or policies, but to present myself as one who will respect and represent the President whose overwhelming election by the people will hopefully give me the honor of serving as ambassador to the State of Israel,” Huckabee declared in his opening statement.

Some senators present, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas), were pleased by Huckabee’s nomination, especially in light of his career-long pro-Israel stance. “You’re going to do a fantastic job, and I’m very happy to see your name for this position,” Cruz said.

Senators Jeff Merkley (D-Or.) and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), in contrast, were the most critical.

A “concern that I've had [regarding the war on Gaza] is the use of humanitarian supplies as [political] leverage, in which they've been restricted time, time, and again under international law. This is generally considered an illegitimate strategy of war,” said Sen. Merkley. “Have you had any concerns at all about Israel restricting the supplies of food to Gaza?”

Huckabee’s response was that Israel “provided 700 trucks a day,” and that “there have been massive supplies,” to Gaza. While about 600 aid trucks were going to Gaza daily during much of the ceasefire, Israel had again cut all humanitarian aid off to the strip in early March, subsequently breaking the ceasefire wholesale on March 18.

“There's been extended periods where very few trucks at all have gotten in. And certainly we did have relief during the ceasefire, but we're now in a new phase of extremely restricted supplies,” Merkley parried, rejecting Huckabee’s assertions outright. “There’s been many, many international organizations that have reported on this, so I know you’re not unaware of it.”

Merkley pressed Huckabee about Trump’s repeatedly stated plan to move Palestinians out of Gaza. Huckabee in turn denied Trump wanted to displace Gazans. “The president has never said that. He has never spoken about forced displacement.”

While Trump and his officials have occasionally walked back suggestions that Palestinians be permanently displaced, Trump has consistently asserted that Gazans must leave the strip entirely for his “Riviera” plan to work. At one point, he even suggested Palestinians could choose whether to leave, but any departures would be permanent.

Senator Chris Van Hollen asked Huckabee if he believed in the collective punishment of the Palestinian people, which he suggested Israel was carrying out. Huckabee said he did not.

“[Israeli] Finance Minister Smotrich suggested [that] it might be justified and moral to starve two million Palestinians in Gaza as part of a strategy [regarding] the hostages. Simple question: do you disagree with Finance Minister Smotrich?” Dodging the question, Huckabee responded that “an ambassador doesn't get to argue with the people of the country,” and that his role would be to represent Trump’s views.

Van Hollen also asked Huckabee about his support for the West Bank annexation by Israel. "I have previously supported it. Yes, sir. But it would not be my prerogative to make that the policy of the president,” Huckabee replied.

Huckabee has previously called for the West Bank to be referred to as “Judea and Samaria,” which is how Israel’s Likud party, long committed to the West Bank’s annexation, refers to the Israeli-occupied territory. U.S. Lawmakers have proposed the same name change in congressional legislation. Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Brian Mast has even instructed GOP committee staffers to comply with it.

Huckabee did not clarify whether he stood by the position when pressed by Van Hollen.

At the hearing, Huckabee also expressed support for Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, saying "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and it is better to bankrupt them than it is to bomb them.”

Other lawmakers and groups have opposed Huckabee’s nomination, describing his Israel positions as too extreme. In addition to claiming that “there’s plenty of land” for Palestinians to go to in other Middle Eastern countries, Huckabee has said “there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian” during his own unsuccessful presidential campaign.

“Huckabee’s positions are not the words of a thoughtful diplomat — they are the words of a provocateur whose views are far outside international consensus and contrary to the core bipartisan principles of American diplomacy,” Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who is Jewish, said in a Monday statement ahead of the hearing. “There is no need for more extremism, and certainly not from the historic ambassador’s post and behind the powerful seal of the United States.”


Top Image Credit: LIVE: Mike Huckabee's confirmation hearing to be ambassador to Israel - Associated Press (YouTube/screenshot)
Analysis | QiOSK
Cutting commands is just the start for broken military system
Top photo credit: NORFOLK, Va. (Apr. 15, 2008) Navy Capt. Patricia Cole, director of the Tailored Maritime Operations Center (T-MOC) at the Naval Network Warfare Command, inspects fellow officers during a command-wide bi-annual uniform inspection. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Corey Lewis File# 080415-N-2147L-001

Cutting commands is just the start for broken military system

Military Industrial Complex

On April 30, new Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Stuart Scheller, a former Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel, announced his intent to push for military reform, echoing the frustrations that led to his 2021 court-martial for publicly criticizing the Afghanistan withdrawal.

His call for accountability resonates with my decades-long work as an advocate for transforming the broken U.S. military personnel and leadership systems and addressing the deep-rooted issues in military culture. These would include bloated bureaucracies, careerism, a lack of ethical leadership, and fossilized military doctrine — all which Scheller’s remarks brought into sharp focus.

keep readingShow less
Emmanuel Macron,  Keir Starmer, Friedrich Merz
Top image credit: TIRANA, ALBANIA - MAY 16: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speak during a Ukraine security meeting at the 6th European Political Community summit on May 16, 2025 at Skanderbeg Square in Tirana, Albania. Leon Neal/Pool via REUTERS

In twist, Europe appears to be deliberately undermining Iran talks

Europe

In a dangerous echo of past miscalculations, the E3 — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — are once again escalating tensions with Iran, this time by threatening to trigger the reinstatement of U.N. Security Council sanctions (the so-called “snapback”) if U.S.-Iran nuclear talks collapse.

The E3 sees such a step as deploying leverage to force concessions from Iran on its nuclear program. However, it risks derailing diplomacy entirely and plunging the Middle East into deeper crisis.

Leading this charge is France, reprising its role as the E3’s most hawkish voice, reminiscent of its hard line in the JCPOA negotiations in 2015. At a closed-door U.N. Security Council meeting on proliferation at the end of April, French Foreign Minister Jean Noël Barrot exemplified this combative turn, saying that if the U.S. – Iran talks do not bear fruit, France and its European partners “will not hesitate for a second to reimpose all the sanctions that were lifted 10 years ago.”

keep readingShow less
Zelensky
Top photo credit: Volodymyr Zelensky (Shutterstock/Dmytro Larin)

The 2026 bill for the Ukraine war is already in the mail

Europe

Ukraine is already asking for more money to continue fighting into 2026, a sure sign that President Volodmyr Zelensky has no plans to end the war.

With the battlefield continuing to favor Russia, European leaders have their collective heads in the sand on who will pay. How long before President Trump walks away?

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.