Follow us on social

Olaf Scholz

Economic woes collapse Germany’s governing coalition

The Ukraine war's shadow looms large, affecting manufacturing and energy prices

Analysis | Europe

Divisions among the members of Germany’s fractious and unpopular governing coalition have reached a breaking point over the proposed budget for 2025. The conflict exposed the starkly different economic policy outlooks of the junior coalition parties — Greens and Liberals (FDP) — with the Social Democrat (SPD) Chancellor Olaf Scholz attempting furiously to mediate a compromise.

After an inconclusive make-or-break meeting on November 6 with the two feuding ministers — Finance Minister Christian Lindner (FDP) and Economics Minister Robert Habeck (Greens) — Scholz announced the firing of Lindner and the collapse of the governing coalition. A caretaker government of SPD and Greens would continue in power through December, with a vote of confidence in January and new elections in March.

The stubborn persistence until now of this much unloved coalition almost certainly reflected the reluctance of all three parties to face what could be a harsh reckoning in early elections, which, if the coalition had survived, would have been held next September.

All three parties have seen their already shaky public support weaken as this recent crisis became more public and more bitter than antecedent quarrels. The coalition parties nevertheless were widely expected to avoid a disruptive breach just as Europeans begin to weigh the implications of the U.S. presidential election results.

Christian Lindner’s pro-business FDP is now polling nationally at about 3%, below the threshold for winning party list seats in the Bundestag. He has been a strong defender of the so-called debt brake, constraining the public sector deficit to no more than 3% of GDP. In a highly irregular move, he leaked last weekend a policy paper offering his own sharply divergent ideas on economic policy, without consultation with partners.

He may have calculated that the FDP had little to lose by provoking the collapse of the coalition and early elections, and to obliquely signal interest in an eventual coalition with the Christian Democrats, who have a commanding lead in opinion polls.

The power struggle has arisen from the imperative to address voters’ concerns about the bleak economic situation, stemming in part from the economic consequences of the war in Ukraine, including higher energy prices and the costs of military and financial support for Ukraine.

Economy minister Habeck recently projected that the economy would contract in 2024 by 0.2%, a downward adjustment from the previous forecast. Germany’s economic malaise is not unique in Europe. There is low public support across Europe for the leadership of mainstream parties and a rise of populist-nationalist challengers, as seen in the European parliament elections in June and in elections in Germany’s eastern states in September.

The most recent phase of slow growth or recession for Germany began in late 2021 and affects core industrial sectors including chemicals and steel, both of which are energy intensive and have not been able to adjust fully to higher prices for natural gas, formerly imported from Russia. The other troubled sector is Germany’s flagship exporting automotive industry. The weakness of this sector can be directly related to the challenge of Chinese electric vehicles both in China’s domestic market and in Europe.

The announcement by Volkswagen in October of its intention to close three plants in Germany and to shed thousands of jobs was a first in the company’s history and contributed to the political crisis. The powerful IG Metall labor union representing the VW workforce and a major part of the SPD’s political base, vowed to resist the planned closures, as did the government and opposition in the state of Lower Saxony, which owns one fifth of VW shares.

In September, the U.S. company Intel announced it would postpone, for at least two years, a planned €30 billion investment in a chip production facility in Magdeburg, aimed in particular to supplying Germany’s automotive industry’s modernization. This project would also have boosted economic development in the former East Germany.

Scholz’s uncharacteristically bold move to jettison Lindner and bring elections forward is clearly aimed at restoring the electoral appeal of his own party and that of the Greens who will remain in a caretaker government until elections in March. The support for the coalition as a whole has suffered in part because of frequent disagreements and paralysis. The three parties’ combined support is only about 30% of the electorate by the most recent polls. The Christian Democrats (CDU-CSU) have more than 30% by themselves, but would still have to find coalition partners in order to form a governing majority.

The two most dynamic political parties are the populist right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the populist left Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), both of which derive some of their appeal from their opposition to the further support for Ukraine. Opponents of the European elites’ stance on Ukraine have performed well in Germany and France, and elsewhere in Europe.

The weakness of the incumbent government and of the mainstream opposition CDU limits Germany’s capacity to launch any diplomatic initiative that could end the war in Ukraine or to help formulate a concerted European approach to security arrangements to include Ukraine in the post-conflict period.

Top image credit: Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier (M) hands Christian Lindner (r/FDP), former Federal Minister of Finance, his certificate of dismissal at Bellevue Palace. Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) looks on.
Analysis | Europe
Botswana’s stunning election upset puts elites on notice

Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) supporters leave the final rally in Tlokweng, east of Gaborone, Botswana October 29, 2024. REUTERS/Thalefang Charles

Botswana’s stunning election upset puts elites on notice

Africa

In a stunning result that ran counter to much of the pre-election analysis and expectations, the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP), which had ruled Botswana since the country’s first post-independence election in 1966, lost its parliamentary majority in last Wednesday’s elections by a landslide.

The long-ruling party won only four of the 61 seats in the National Assembly, down from the 38 it won in the last general election five years ago.

keep readingShow less
Joe Biden Xi Jinping China United States
Top photo credit: U.S. President Joe Biden meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the G20 leaders' summit in Bali, Indonesia, November 14, 2022. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

Confucius says: Get the definition of US-China ‘competition’ right

Asia-Pacific

Sparked by a Foreign Affairs essay proposing a “theory of victory” toward China, many prominent American analysts have joined the debate on whether the United States needs a “theory of victory” in its competition with China.

A recent report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) frames the debate in terms of “end state” vs. “steady state” in U.S.-China policy. The report presents a diversity of views from American observers as well as analysts from select countries in Asia and Europe. Collectively, these views reveal the central parameters of the current debate on U.S.-China competition.

keep readingShow less
$4000 soap dispensers on Air Force planes? Just you wait.
Top photo credit: Page 17, Department of Defense (DoD) Inspector General: Audit of C-17 Spare Parts Pricing (10/25/24).

$4000 soap dispensers on Air Force planes? Just you wait.

Military Industrial Complex

Time is running out for Congress to pass the annual defense policy bill. After the election, lawmakers must reconcile the differences between their versions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and set the topline for Pentagon spending in fiscal year 2025. When they do, they must strip two measures that will make it easier for contractors to engage in price gouging.

While the House abided by the spending caps Congress established in last year’s debt deal, the Senate added about $25 billion to the president’s budget request for the Pentagon — bringing the department’s topline to a whopping $912 billion. This is excessive, and the increase will not make Americans any safer. Lawmakers should communicate that to those negotiating the final NDAA.

keep readingShow less

Election 2024

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.