Follow us on social

google cta
europe flags

Poll: Europeans see US as 'necessary partner' not 'ally'

Is this 'the potential death knell of the Transatlantic Alliance'?

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Europeans increasingly see the United States as a “necessary partner” rather than an “ally,” according to a new poll of 14 European countries released Wednesday by the European Council on Foreign Relations.

The survey of more than 18,000 adults across the continent was conducted in the weeks following the U.S. presidential elections on Nov. 5, in which Donald Trump defeated his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris.

Trump did not take office until Jan 20, although his skepticism about transatlantic cooperation and NATO and his criticism of the European Union during his previous tenure as president (2017-2021) and during the election campaign were well known in Europe.

“Our new poll highlights a remarkable shift in public opinion — and, as a headline, the potential death knell of the Transatlantic Alliance,” asserted Arturo Varvelli, an ECFR senior fellow who co-authored a report that accompanied the poll’s release. “That Europeans, today, see the United States more as a ‘necessary partner’ than an ‘ally’ speaks to a collapse of trust in Washington’s foreign policy agenda.”

Fourteen countries were covered by the survey, including Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and Ukraine. All of the countries except the UK and Ukraine are EU members, and all except Ukraine are members of NATO.

The survey and the accompanying report, “Transatlantic twilight: European public opinion and the long shadow of Trump,” also found that Europeans believe that peace talks between Ukraine and Russia are imminent and that the most likely outcome of the nearly three-year-old war will be a “compromise settlement” in which neither country will achieve its optimal outcome.

Majorities or pluralities of respondents in even what have been the most hawkish countries, notably Estonia, Denmark, the UK, and Poland, appear reconciled to such an outcome, although they also support continuing to supply Kyiv with the weapons it needs to continue its fight.

Coincidentally, the poll’s release came on the same day that Trump held what he described as a “lengthy and highly productive phone call” with Russian President Vladimir Putin centered in major part on ending the war in Ukraine, characterizing it as the beginning of a negotiation to end the war in Ukraine, and that his defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, told a NATO meeting Ukraine’s hopes of restoring its pre-2014 borders were “unrealistic.”

The poll also found that Europeans still see China less favorably than the United States. An average of 43% of respondents across the continent said they see China as a “necessary partner” or “ally” of the EU, 35% said they regard it as a “rival” or “adversary.” The most pro-China sentiment was found in southern Europe, particularly Bulgaria, Hungary, Spain, Romania, Italy, and Portugal. Majorities or pluralities with much less favorable view were found in Germany, Denmark, the UK, and France, respectively.

But the most significant finding, according to the ECFR analysts, was the prevailing view in every EU member state and the UK that the U.S. could no longer be seen as an “ally,” but rather as a “necessary partner.”

That assessment held for respondents in even the traditionally most Atlanticist-oriented countries, such as Poland where 45% of respondents said “necessary partner” vs 31% “ally) and Denmark (53% vs. 30%), and even the UK (44% vs. 37%), which has enjoyed a “special relationship” with Washington dating back to the Second World War. Only 18 months earlier, majorities in those countries saw the US primarily as an ally.

Those countries where respondents were most likely to view the U.S. as a “necessary partner” included Ukraine (67% vs. 27%), Spain (57% vs. 14%), Estonia (55% vs. 28%), Portugal (55% vs. 18%) and Italy (53% vs. 18%).

ECFR’s analysts viewed this shift as potentially tectonic and attributed it mostly to perceptions of Trump based on his previous administration and statements.

“Donald Trump’s recent actions towards historic US allies show that the Atlantic community is no longer underpinned by shared values,” according to Jana Puglierin, a senior ECFR fellow and co-author of the report. “In a world of Trump 2.0, transactionality reigns… For EU leaders, this will require a positional shift, away from the Washington-led status quo, towards one that showcases internal unity and an ability for Europe to exert its own influence on the world stage.”

Whether such a shift is possible, however, will depend to a significant extent on whether such unity can be achieved.

Indeed, the poll found major divisions among respondents in different members states of views regarding Trump. Asked whether Trump’s return to power was a “good” or “bad” development, respondents in southeastern Europe, particularly in Hungary, Bulgaria, and Romania, were more likely to see the president as positive for their own countries and world peace.

Conversely, clear majorities in Denmark, the UK, and Germany said they saw Trump’s return as “bad” news for their own countries and world peace.

While large majorities of respondents who identified with far-right parties in Hungary, Poland, and Italy said they believed Trump would be good for their countries and world peace, pluralities of self-described partisans of Germany’s AfD party and France’s Rassemblement National said they thought the U.S. president would be “bad” for their countries and world peace.

As for attitudes towards the EU itself, the report identified four groups: “Euro-optimists,” the largest group at 30% of respondents and strongest in Estonia, Denmark, Ukraine, Spain and Portugal, were inclined to see the Union as a great power unlikely to collapse within the next 20 years; “Europessimists” (22%) who disagree with both propositions and who are strongest among right-wing parties across the continent; “Euro-realists” (17%) who don’t think the EU will fail but are skeptical of its power and are strongest in Denmark, Ukraine, Poland, and Germany); and “Euro-mortalists” (11%) who see It as a great power but vulnerable to collapse.

The apparent decline in trust and confidence in the U.S.-European relationship, as evidenced by the downgrade from “ally” to “necessary partner” should prompt greater realism among leaders who support the EU, the report stressed. “This finding alone should sharpen minds about the need for Europe to embrace greater pragmatism and autonomy in its global dealings, as a means of protecting its citizens and values in the coming period,” according to Varbelli.


Top photo credit: Shutterstock/Markus Pfaff
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Ignorance about war powers plays right into Trump's hands
Top image credit: US House Speaker Mike Johnson arrives for press briefing at Columbia University in New York on April 24, 2024. (Shutterstock/lev radin)

Ignorance about war powers plays right into Trump's hands

Washington Politics

This week efforts under the War Powers Act to check President Trump’s unconstitutional and unauthorized war in Iran failed on a mostly party line split in both the House and the Senate. The result isn’t all that surprising. The naivety, however, on the role of Congress in matters of war is staggering. Congress is in desperate need of a civics refresher.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), in response to reporter questions on the application of the War Powers Act’s provisions to the president’s actions in Iran, said, “I think the president has the authority that he needs to conduct the activities. … As you know, there’s a lot of controversy around, questions around the War Powers Act, but I think the president is acting in the best interests of the nation.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.