Follow us on social

google cta
US ATACMs in Ukraine gamble with future civilians' lives

US ATACMs in Ukraine gamble with future civilians' lives

Rockets from the advanced weapons system carry hundreds of cluster bombs, many of which will live on long after the war is over.

Analysis | Europe
google cta
google cta

The Biden administration’s decision to send ATACM rockets loaded with cluster munitions to Ukraine ignores the many decades of human suffering caused by these indiscriminate weapons. It also disregards a strong international consensus that acknowledges that there is no responsible use of cluster munitions. This is not acceptable. We need a new policy.

My wife and I began learning about cluster bombs more than 40 years ago while working in Laos with Mennonite Central Committee. On trip after trip throughout the countryside, we met families whose lives had been shattered by unexploded cluster bombs that still lurked in gardens, paddy dikes, school yards or pastureland.

In 2000, I met Mr. Phou Vieng who was not even safe in his own home. As he attempted to anchor his bedposts in the earthen floor, his digging tool struck a buried cluster bomblet which exploded and tore off an arm and leg, nearly killing him.

This cluster bomb had been dropped from an airplane, at least 25 years earlier during the U.S. air war (1964-1973). Like countless other victims of cluster bombs whom we met, Phou Vieng was not the target. Rather, unexploded cluster bombs had turned Laos into a lethal landscape of roulette which terrorized Phou Vieng when he was merely trying to create a comfortable place to sleep.

And so it is with cluster bombs wherever they are used. They violate the most central principle of international humanitarian law. They fail to distinguish between military targets and civilian life in two significant ways. First, they are difficult to target precisely, creating a large “footprint” of harm that often includes civilians. Second, many do not explode on impact, but persist over time, maiming and killing whoever disturbs them long after wars end.

The fact that cluster bombs are small and numerous makes them especially pernicious. The size of a baseball, a size-D battery or a long soda can, they can easily hide in the natural environment. The ATACM rockets sent to Ukraine carry 950 submunitions, more than 10 times the number carried in the DPICM artillery shells which had been sent earlier. This will greatly increase the quantity of U.S.-sourced unexploded ordnance in Ukraine. Even relatively low dud rates can leave behind a trail of lethal ordnance that can take many years to find and safely destroy.

To its credit, the U.S. government is a strong contributor to clearance work in Laos and other places. Through this work U.S. officials have heard many tragic stories like those of Mr. Phou Vieng. Yet despite clear knowledge of the indiscriminate effects of these weapons, the U.S. used cluster munitions in Iraq (1991, 2003-2006), Kuwait (1991) Yugoslavia (1999) and Afghanistan (2001), causing many more casualties.

The U.S. did not participate in the negotiations that resulted in the Convention on Cluster Munitions. In these meetings, U.S. officials would have heard compelling testimony by victims of cluster bombs from places like Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ethiopia, Lebanon, and the former Yugoslavia, to name a few. They would have met Soraj Habib who lost both legs to a U.S. cluster bomb in Afghanistan. He implored the delegates in Dublin, Ireland to “let the children have peace and a life without cluster munitions.”

The U.S. would also have heard the principled statements of many of its allies about why war cannot be waged without restriction, and why cluster munitions must be banned in order to protect civilians. They would have seen the Convention on Cluster Munitions, not as an impractical impediment to U.S. national defense strategy, but as a landmark treaty borne from decades of human trauma, determined to preserve life, safety, and the integrity of international humanitarian law. Sadly, amid these intense meetings which put the protection of civilians at the center of the debate, the U.S. was absent.

Now U.S. cluster munitions are falling on Ukraine’s soil alongside those from Russia. The Ukraine Foreign Ministry, along with experts from GLOBSEC estimate that 30% of Ukraine territory is now contaminated by mines and unexploded ordnance, turning once productive land into a place of fear and harm. When this war ends, the enormous, costly, and dangerous task of clearing the land can begin. How many lives will be lost or filled with trauma in the decades that follow?

The important role of clearance work cannot be overstated, but it is only a partial formula for protecting civilians during and after warfare. To truly protect civilians, indiscriminate weapons such as cluster munitions must be prohibited at the level of policy. In shipping ATACMs to Ukraine, the U.S. ignores decades of evidence that demonstrate this principle. The U.S. should reverse course, accede to the CCM treaty, and destroy its stockpiles of cluster munitions. This will not undo the past, but surely for the sake of humanity, we must resolve not to repeat it.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

A unexploded cluster bomb from a multiple rocket launcher is seen embedded in the ground on a wheat field in Mykolaiv, Ukraine, 22 July 2022. The Mykolaiv region is facing increased missile attacks and shelling as Russian forces bolster their military presence in the neighbouring Kherson region, which experts believe is in preparation to retake land lost to Ukrainian forces. (Photo by Maciek Musialek/NurPhoto)

google cta
Analysis | Europe
Gaza tent city
Top photo credit: Palestinian Mohammed Abu Halima, 43, sits in front of his tent with his children in a camp for displaced Palestinians in Gaza City, Gaza, on December 11, 2025. Matrix Images / Mohammed Qita

Four major dynamics in Gaza War that will impact 2026

Middle East

Just ahead of the New Year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to visit President Donald Trump in Florida today, no doubt with a wish list for 2026. Already there have been reports that he will ask Trump to help attack Iran’s nuclear program, again.

Meanwhile, despite the media narrative, the war in Gaza is not over, and more specifically, it has not ended in a clear victory for Netanyahu’s IDF forces. Nor has the New Year brought solace to the Palestinians — at least 71,000 have been killed since October 2023. But there have been a number of important dynamics and developments in 2025 that will affect not only Netanyahu’s “asks” but the future of security in Israel and the region.

keep readingShow less
Sokoto Nigeria
Top photo credit: Map of Nigeria (Shutterstock/Juan Alejandro Bernal)

Trump's Christmas Day strikes on Nigeria beg question: Why Sokoto?

Africa

For the first time since President Trump publicly excoriated Nigeria’s government for allegedly condoning a Christian genocide, Washington made good on its threat of military action on Christmas Day when U.S. forces conducted airstrikes against two alleged major positions of the Islamic State (IS-Sahel) in northwestern Sokoto state.

According to several sources familiar with the operation, the airstrike involved at least 16 GPS-guided munitions launched from the Navy destroyer, USS Paul Ignatius, stationed in the Gulf of Guinea. Debris from unexpended munition consistent with Tomahawk cruise missile components have been recovered in the village of Jabo, Sokoto state, as well nearly 600 miles away in Offa in Kwara state.

keep readingShow less
What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?
Top image credit: Voodison328 via shutterstock.com

What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?

Global Crises

Earlier this month in Geneva, delegates to the Antipersonnel Mine Ban Treaty’s 22nd Meeting of States Parties confronted the most severe crisis in the convention’s nearly three-decade history. That crisis was driven by an unprecedented convergence of coordinated withdrawals by five European states and Ukraine’s attempt to “suspend” its treaty obligations amid an ongoing armed conflict.

What unfolded was not only a test of the resilience of one of the world’s most successful humanitarian disarmament treaties, but also a critical moment for the broader system of international norms designed to protect civilians during and after war. Against a background of heightened tensions resulting from the war in Ukraine and unusual divisions among the traditional convention champions, the countries involved made decisions that will have long-term implications.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.