Follow us on social

google cta
Container Terminal Durban South Africa

‘Duty free’ Africa trade deal extended — for now

AGOA’s short-term renewal is sparking debates about its future as tariffs bite

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Included in the massive $1.2 trillion spending package signed by President Trump yesterday is a provision for the short-term renewal of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). AGOA, which first became law in the waning days of President Bill Clinton’s final term in office in 2000, provides duty-free access to the U.S. market for over 1,800 goods exported to the U.S. from countries across sub-Saharan Africa.

AGOA’s short-term renewal caps a topsy-turvy period for the preferential trade agreement. Many Africa watchers assumed in the early months of Trump’s second term that the trade agreement — which, before yesterday, had last been renewed in 2015 — would expire at the end of September without any effort by the administration to renew it.

This view was largely derived from the fact that AGOA seems to contrast with Trump’s wider trade policy of trying to get other countries to reduce their barriers of entry for American goods. The act only explicitly eliminates tariffs on goods exported from sub-Saharan Africa to the United States, not for goods being exported from the United States to sub-Saharan countries. Trump has long stated his desire to end asymmetric trade agreements by increasing American barriers to entry while forcing other countries to reduce their trade barriers for American-exported products.

Yet, in the days before AGOA’s expiration, Trump surprised much of the policy world by coming out in favor of its one-year renewal while negotiations take place over the details of its long-term future.

After its expiration in September, two competing bills were presented in Congress for its short-term reauthorization. The first was presented by Senator John Kennedy (R-La.), which would have renewed the agreement for two years through 2027. A second bill was presented in December by Representative Jason Smith (R-Mo.), which would have extended the agreement temporarily through the end of 2028.

Though quite similar, one of the key differences between the two bills is that Kennedy’s included a forced review of the bilateral U.S.-South Africa relationship. This came after last year’s public scuffle between President Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. During the argument, Trump accused the South African government of expropriating land from white South Africans without fair compensation. Also, there being no evidence of this, Trump accused the South African government of failing to stop a genocide against the country’s white population.

The AGOA renewal signed into law yesterday does not include a mandated review of the U.S.-South Africa relationship.

Although Smith’s three-year renewal bill passed the House of Representatives on January 12, it stalled in the Senate as Trump’s team reiterated their request to Congress for a one-year, rather than a three-year, AGOA renewal. In line with this request, a provision was added to the spending bill that would extend AGOA just through the end of 2026. It provides retroactive benefits for AGOA-eligible goods that were exported from sub-Saharan countries to the United States during the period between AGOA’s expiration in September and before the start of the new year.

With AGOA’s short-term reauthorization official, debates over its long-term future will now kick into gear.

A question that is certain to come up has to do with whether AGOA-eligible countries should be immune from Trump’s broader tariff policy. As it currently stands, AGOA’s breadth has been hobbled by the sweeping tariffs Trump has placed on countries across the world, including many that would otherwise receive duty-free access to the American market through AGOA. Thirteen of the 30 countries currently eligible to receive AGOA benefits face tariffs of 15%, while South Africa faces a 30% tariff on its exports to the United States. These duties supersede AGOA’s preferential trade benefits, meaning that AGOA is essentially defunct for countries forced to contend with these tariffs.

Another piece of the broader debate over AGOA’s long-term renewal will center on whether the next iteration of the act will provide American exporters some sort of preferential trade benefits to the sub-Saharan market. Trump has long blamed one-sided preferential trade agreements for hurting America’s trade balance. The president argues that a reduction in barriers for American exporters will benefit American industry — and thus Americans working for firms selling to foreign customers — by increasing exports and leading to a fairer trade regime that rebalances American trade.

In line with this thinking, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said, “AGOA for the 21st century must demand more from our trading partners and yield more market access for U.S. businesses, farmers, and ranchers.”


Top Image Credit: A general view of the Container Terminal at the port in Durban, South Africa, April 10, 2025. REUTERS/Rogan Ward [Reuters Connect]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump Venezuela
Top image credit: President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Geo-kleptocracy and the rise of 'global mafia politics'

Global Crises

“As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust, for a long period of time. … We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” said President Donald Trump the morning after U.S. forces invaded Caracas and carried off the indicted autocrat Nicolàs Maduro.

The invasion of Venezuela on Jan. 3 did not result in regime change but rather a deal coerced at the barrel of a gun. Maduro’s underlings may stay in power as long as they open the country’s moribund petroleum industry to American oil majors. Government repression still rules the day, simply without Maduro.

keep readingShow less
Russian icebreakers
Top photo credit: Russian nuclear powered Icebreaker Yamal during removal of manned drifting station North Pole-36. August 2009. (Wikimedia Commmons)

Trump's Greenland, Canada threats reflect angst over Russia shipping

North America

Like it or not, Russia is the biggest polar bear in the arctic, which helps to explain President Trump’s moves on Greenland.

However, the Biden administration focused on it too. And it isn’t only about access to resources and military positioning, but also about shipping. And there, the Russians are some way ahead.

keep readingShow less
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: An Iranian cleric and a young girl stand next to scale models of Iran-made ballistic missiles and centrifuges after participating in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally marking the anniversary of the U.S. embassy occupation in downtown Tehran, Iran, on November 4, 2025.(Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via REUTERS CONNECT)

Want Iran to get the bomb? Try regime change

Middle East

Washington is once again flirting with a familiar temptation: the belief that enough pressure, and if necessary, military force, can bend Iran to its will. The Trump administration appears ready to move beyond containment toward forcing collapse. Before treating Iran as the next candidate for forced transformation, policymakers should ask a question they have consistently failed to answer in the Middle East: “what follows regime change?”

The record is sobering. In the past two decades, regime change in the region has yielded state fragmentation, authoritarian restoration, or prolonged conflict. Iraq remains fractured despite two decades of U.S. investment. Egypt’s democratic opening collapsed within a year. Libya, Syria, and Yemen spiraled into civil wars whose spillover persists. In each case, removing a regime proved far easier than constructing a viable successor. Iran would not be the exception. It would be the rule — at a scale that dwarfs anything the region has experienced.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.