Follow us on social

2023-07-12t000000z_1923718200_mt1nurpho000duvn59_rtrmadp_3_g7-leaders-meeting-with-volodymyr-zelenskyy-in-vilnius-scaled

Update: Biden asks Congress for $25 billion in new Ukraine aid

The new money is included in a $40B emergency spending request, setting up a fight over whether Congress should blow off caps.

Analysis | Washington Politics

Update 8/10, 4 p.m. ET: President Biden made a detailed formal request for a new $40 billion emergency spending bill that includes some $25 billion in Ukraine-related assistance.

Roll Call has and excellent synopsis of what is in the request, here.

My colleague Bill Hartung looks at that military aid more closely and what isn't in the request, here.


According to reports from Bloomberg News, President Biden is expected to unveil a new $25 billion aid package for Ukraine today. This will reportedly include $13 billion in military assistance and $12 billion for humanitarian relief and other assistance.

This tracks with reports from Politico and Punchbowl News this week, that Biden is putting together a package for Congress to vote on this fall.

The U.S. has disbursed nearly $44 billion in weapons and other military assistance since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 (that is not counting other aid, which takes that total to over $113 billion).

Politico quotes Army acquisitions chief Doug Bush as confirming the president is firming up a proposal. “Details of that still have to be set by the Office of Management Budget but I think we have a very strong case to hopefully garner congressional support for continued funding for munitions, production increases, and munitions buys to support Ukraine," he said.

Congress will have to act on this before the Sept. 30 fiscal year deadline, at which time it will be expected to pass all major spending bills or the government shuts down. According to Hill watchers, the Ukraine aid will likely not be a standalone bill, but part of a supplemental "emergency spending" package that falls outside of the spending caps that Congress and Biden agreed to during the debt ceiling debate. It will also include other "must have" items in it, like disaster relief for major U.S. storm events and/or new weapons aid for Taiwan.

Of course there will be some sort of fight on Capitol Hill but the shape and rigor of it is not yet known. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has said he would not support any new spending above the caps, yet Senators like Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, and Chuck Schumer have advocated using emergency spending to breach those limits, including defense hikes, from the start. Some Republican lawmakers say they will oppose new Ukraine aid, or put conditions on it, but it is clear they are outnumbered in this regard on both sides of the aisle. Whether they can stymie the process in the House is the question.

And how do Americans feel? It depends on the polling and the timing. According to a CNN/SSRS poll released last week, 55 percent of Americans do not think Congress “should authorize additional funding to support Ukraine in the war with Russia,” while 45 percent said Congress should approve more. Pluralities continued to support military training and intelligence gathering for Ukraine, but only 43 percent said the U.S. should be giving the country more weapons.


U.S. President Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky leave the conference room during G7 Declaration of Joint Support for Ukraine during the high level NATO summit in Litexpo Conference Centre in Vilnius, Lithuania on July 12, 2023. (Photo by Dominika Zarzycka/NurPhoto)
Analysis | Washington Politics
Mark Levin
Top photo credit: Erick Stakelbeck on TBN/Screengrab

The great fade out: Neocon influencers rage as they diminish

Media

Mark Levin appears to be having a meltdown.

The veteran neoconservative talk host is repulsed by reports that President Donald Trump might be inching closer to an Iranian nuclear deal, reducing the likelihood of war. In addition to his rants on how this would hurt Israel, Levin has been howling to anyone who will listen that any deal with Iran needs approval from Congress (funny he doesn’t have the same attitude for waging war, only for making peace).

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.