Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1046082265-scaled

'About $45 billion' in new Ukraine aid tucked into omnibus bill

If the spending measure is passed this week, that will mean assistance to Ukraine will top out at more than $100 billion in 2022.

Europe

According to reports overnight, House and Senate lawmakers have agreed to an omnibus package —a massive spending bill to keep the government going after Friday and into next year — that includes "about $45 billion" in new Ukraine aid. That's eight billion more than what President Biden was reportedly asking for to finish out the year.

If it passes, that will mean U.S. assistance to Ukraine in its war against Russia will top out at more than $100 billion for the year. This includes humanitarian/economic aid as well as the steady flow of weapons into that country since Putin declared his "special operation" and invaded Ukraine in February.

To put this into context, Russia's projected defense budget for 2023 is $84 billion.

According to a summary of the Ukraine aid released Tuesday, under the DoD, $9 billion will go to direct weapons and other military assistance for Ukraine and $11.8 billion will go to replenish U.S. military stocks that have been depleted since February due to transfers to Ukraine. It will also include nearly $7 billion for U.S.-European command operations in support of Ukraine, and $6 million for oversight.

Meanwhile, more funds are allocated under State Department and foreign operations, including increasing the President’s authority to transfer defense equipment to Ukraine to $14.5 billion, and $560 million in State Department security assistance funding for Ukraine and other allies.

This will be the fourth package for Ukraine. The first was after the invasion in March for $13.6 billion, the second was $40 billion in May and the third was $12.3 billion, which was attached to the continuing resolution in September to keep the current budget going. Altogether, the three packages total some $65 billion.

Of that, according to CSIS defense analyst Mark Cancian, nearly $30 billion of that has been military aid, including direct short and longterm support to Ukraine, U.S. military operations in the region, and "general support" that is "tangentially related to Ukraine."

As of this writing, we do not know the breakdown of the new $45 billion package, how much is military, or where it would go, but if you want to see where the money has been going since February, my colleague Connor Echols has been keeping with each new disbursement of the military aid, here.

This post was updated to reflect new details released as part of the omnibus package.


Photo: Orhan Cam via shutterstock.com
Europe
Diplomacy Watch
Top Photo Credit: Khody Akhavi

Diplomacy Watch: Euro leaders  reeling after Trump-Putin call

QiOSK

Europeans are surprised and frustrated by President Trump’s decision to call Russian President Putin without consulting Ukrainian President Zelenskyy or other European leadership.

The president made good on his promise to begin negotiations with Russia by having a phone call with President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, which he described as “lengthy and highly productive” and indicated that further negotiations would begin “immediately.”

keep readingShow less
Donald Trump Marc Fogel
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump greets Marc Fogel at the White House after his release from a Russian prison, Tuesday, February 11, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's peace efforts should be a wake-up call for Dems

QiOSK

In less than 3 weeks, President Trump secured a ceasefire in Gaza, spoke directly to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky, and kickstarted diplomacy to end the Ukraine war. At the same time, he has also put forward some idiotic ideas, such as pushing Palestinians out of Gaza and making Canada the 51st state.

But it raises important questions: Why didn't the Biden administration choose to push for an end to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine? Why didn't the majority of the Democrats demand it? Instead, they went down the path of putting Liz Cheney on a pedestal and having Kamala Harris brag about having the most lethal military in the world while Trump positioned himself as a peace candidate — justifiably or not.

keep readingShow less
Pete Hegseth NATO
Top photo credit: U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks next to German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius during a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group on the eve of a NATO defence ministers' meeting at the alliance's headquarters in Brussels, Belgium February 12, 2025. REUTERS/Johanna Geron

Hegseth finally pops bubble of illusion: 'No NATO for Ukraine'

QiOSK

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth showed unusual candor in his remarks today to the NATO membership about the terms of peace for Ukraine. Although they are unlikely to see things this way, he deserves special gratitude from the Ukrainian and European establishments, for his statement dispels the illusions in which they have been indulging themselves — illusions that if continued could hold up the peace process and increase the dangers to Ukraine.

In remarks before a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Group of NATO defense ministers and in advance of the Munich Security Conference next week, Hegseth said the following:

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.