Follow us on social

google cta
52386946699_f0e66e8b78_o-scaled

Many Biden officials previously supported Yemen War Powers resolution

The White House is lobbying Senators to vote against the measure, but most of the president's top aides backed it in the Trump era.

Reporting | Middle East
google cta
google cta

UPDATE: 12/14 6 a.m. EST: Sen. Bernie Sanders pulled the Yemen resolution Tuesday night from a vote, stating he would instead enter into negotiations for compromise language with the Biden Administration, which opposed the bill as-is, according to the Intercept.

“I’m not going to ask for a vote tonight,” Sanders said, according to the Intercept. “I look forward to working with the administration who is opposed to this resolution and see if we can come up with something that is strong and effective. If we do not, I will be back."

_____________________________________________________

This morning, the Intercept’s Ryan Grim reported that the Biden administration is urging Senators to vote against the Yemen War Powers resolution that the Senate is expected to vote on later this evening. According to Grim, “The White House is arguing that a vote in favor is unnecessary because, despite the lapse of the ceasefire, significant hostilities have not yet resumed, and the vote will complicate diplomacy.” Grim later reported on Twitter that White House staff would urge the president to veto the bill if it does pass. 

The bill would restrict U.S. involvement in hostilities in Yemen and reassert Congress’s warmaking authority. The bill has the support of members on both sides of the aisle, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), and, reportedly, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) 

But Grim’s reports demonstrate a pronounced shift among Biden officials as key members of the administration, including Secretary of State Antony Blinken, CIA Director Avril Haines, national security adviser Jake Sullivan, deputy national security adviser Jon Finer, and Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, signed letters during the Trump years calling for an end to the U.S. role in the war in Yemen. 

The first letter, released in November 2018 — the letter that includes Blinken and Haines — was signed exclusively by former Obama administration officials and acknowledged that the approach in the Obama years “did not succeed in limiting and ultimately ending the war,” and that “rather than learning from that failure, the Trump administration has doubled down on support for the Saudi leadership’s prosecution of the war ...[t]he results have been devastating.” 

The letter concluded “now, we must cease support altogether.”

After Trump vetoed a Yemen War Powers resolution passed by Congress in April 2019, a second letter later that year — signed by Sullivan, Sherman and current Biden officials Susan Rice and Samantha Power — urged members of Congress to use the opportunity presented by the NDAA vote to effectively override the veto. The letter called the war in Yemen “a constitutional matter facing Congress that may be unparalleled in its potential impact on millions of human lives.”

The situation on the ground may have changed since then, but the UN-brokered truce expired in October, and experts say the United States must do what it can to prevent human suffering and a return to all-out war. “If it doesn't pass,” the Quincy Institute’s Annelle Sheline told Politico’s NatSec Daily referring to the current Yemen WPR, “I think the greater danger is that the Saudis could restart airstrikes and/or prevent flights and fuel ships. Most of the civilian casualties at this point are from insufficient food, water and medical care, due to the Saudis destroying Yemen's infrastructure.”

Indeed, twoDemocratic members of the House wrote in The Nation earlier this year that “[a]s a candidate, President Biden pledged to end support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen while many who now serve as senior officials in his administration repeatedly called for shutting down precisely the activities the US is engaged in that enable Saudi Arabia’s brutal offensive.”

Editors’ note: Current Iran Envoy for the Biden administration Rob Malley, who is related to this author, also signed both letters.


President Joe Biden confers with National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan during a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Thursday, August 25, 2022, in the Oval Office. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)
google cta
Reporting | Middle East
US missiles
Top photo credit: . DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Vince Parker, U.S. Air Force.

Trump: We have 'unlimited' weapons to fight 'forever' war

QiOSK

In a startling Truth Social post overnight on Monday, President Donald Trump defied reality and claimed that U.S. weapons were "unlimited" and the U.S. could fight "forever" with "these supplies."


keep readingShow less
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS
Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Craven Europeans give US and Israel a blank check for illegal war

Middle East

In the aftermath of the new U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, the transatlantic alliance has offered a response that confirmed what many both in the West and outside knew all along: that for London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels, the "rules-based international order" has been reduced to a simple, brutal premise: might makes right, provided the might is Western.

The joint statement from the E3 — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — is a master class in evasion. "We did not participate in these strikes, but are in close contact with our international partners, including the United States and Israel," they declared. The text also lists all the references and rationalizations used by Iran hawks — “nuclear program, ballistic missile program, regional destabilization and repression against its own people.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.