Follow us on social

google cta
US defense chief offers show of support to Georgia

US defense chief offers show of support to Georgia

The visit comes amid a rocky patch in relations between the two partners, and in the middle of a heated election campaign.

Analysis | Europe
google cta
google cta

The United States secretary of defense has visited Georgia and pledged a new level of military cooperation, even as the Georgian government is increasingly coming under criticism from Washington for its drift toward illiberalism and authoritarianism.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, on an October 18 visit to Tbilisi, announced a new Georgia Defense and Deterrence Enhancement Initiative, which he told reporters would represent “an exciting new phase of bilateral security cooperation between our countries.”

Military aid already makes up a significant portion of the U.S.’s total aid package to Georgia, which is one of the largest aid recipients in the former Soviet Union: the $146 million in U.S. assistance it is projected to receive in 2020 puts it second only to Ukraine, which has more than 10 times the population. Of that $146 million, more than half – $76 million – is slated for security assistance, according to official U.S. data.

In 2017, the U.S. approved the sale, long sought by Georgia, of anti-tank Javelin missiles. The two countries regularly carry out large-scale military exercises in Georgia, and thousands of Georgian soldiers have been trained by U.S. forces. In 2020, the Pentagon allocated $10 million to train and equip Georgian special forces troops.

It was not immediately clear how the new program would add to the existing military cooperation. But the show of support from Austin was significant, coming amid a rocky patch in relations between Tbilisi and Washington.

In recent months U.S. officials have become increasingly critical of Georgia’s government. U.S. ambassador to Tbilisi Kelly Degnan in July said she was “exasperated” by the government’s withdrawal from a deal aimed at easing political tensions that had been painstakingly brokered by Tbilisi’s Western allies. And the State Department this summer hinted that it was considering imposing some kind of sanctions against Georgian officials following large-scale, government-endorsed right-wing pogroms against LGBT activists and journalists.

But Austin’s visit is a reminder that military relationships often transcend politics and questions of democracy and human rights. Ahead of his visit, Pentagon officials said the trip was intended as a show of support for Georgia’s firmly pro-Western, anti-Russia foreign policy orientation.

"We are reassuring and reinforcing the sovereignty of countries that are on the frontlines of Russian aggression," an unnamed senior defense official said, according to a Defense Department news release. Georgia was the first stop on Austin’s trip, which also was scheduled to include stops in Ukraine, Romania, and a NATO summit in Brussels.

Austin did allude to Georgia’s democratization in his public remarks. “The Georgian government must do its part by leveraging U.S. support to strengthen Georgia’s democracy and to make fundamental reforms to bring Georgia even closer to the West,” he said at a joint press conference with Georgian Defense Minister Juansher Burchuladze.

By far the greater emphasis of the visit, however, was on security and foreign policy issues. Austin reiterated Washington’s support for Georgia’s stalled aspirations to join NATO and denounced Russia’s “occupation” of Georgian territory (referring to Moscow’s heavy financial and political support for the self-proclaimed governments of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, in what is largely internationally recognized as Georgian territory).

The visit came during a period of heightened political tension in the country, following shortly after the arrest of opposition leader and former president Mikheil Saakashvili and just ahead of a second round of local elections, scheduled for October 30.

All mainstream political forces in Georgia embrace a strongly pro-Western, anti-Russian foreign policy orientation. The opposition nevertheless accuses the ruling Georgian Dream party and its leader Bidzina Ivanishvili of being Russian stooges and has tried to frame politics in the country as a geopolitical struggle, a West-vs-Russia proxy battle.

“Let us stand together with the Georgian people against the Ivanishvili regime, which is dragging our homeland into Putin's Russia,” Saakashvili said in a message written for an October 14 rally in Tbilisi calling for his release. “We must not let this happen, and we must put Georgia back on the path to the West.”

Whatever resonance that message may have had, it was undercut by Austin’s warm rapport with ruling party officials, led by hardline Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili.

https://twitter.com/SecDef/status/1450076525894717445?s=20

"Your visit is a very strong message from the United States in support of our territorial integrity and sovereignty," Garibashvili told Austin.

Austin also gave a boost to Georgia’s opposition to a newly proposed “3+3” regional grouping, promoted by Turkey in the wake of last year’s war between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The format would include the three countries of the South Caucasus and their three big neighbors: Russia, Iran, and Turkey. All six countries have endorsed the idea save Georgia, which objects to the group’s inclusion of Russia and exclusion of “Western” countries.

Austin was asked about the 3+3 proposal at the press conference.

“Russia, which currently occupies 20 percent of Georgia’s territory, should focus on honoring its 2008 ceasefire commitments before promoting any new discussion platforms,” he said, referring to the agreement ending that year’s war over South Ossetia. Russia has not withdrawn its armed forces from Abkhazia and South Ossetia as stipulated in that agreement. “We certainly encourage the countries of the South Caucasus to work together to resolve disputes and to strengthen regional cooperation,” Austin added.

This article has been republished with permission from Eurasianet.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III is greeted by Georgian Minister of Defense Juansher Burchuladze, Georgian Chief of Defense, Major General Giorgi Matiashvili and U.S. Ambassador to Georgia Kelly Degnam in Tbilisi, Georgia, Oct. 18, 2021. (DoD photo by Chad J. McNeeley)|Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III is greeted by Georgian Minister of Defense Juansher Burchuladze, Georgian Chief of Defense, Major General Giorgi Matiashvili and U.S. Ambassador to Georgia Kelly Degnam in Tbilisi, Georgia, Oct. 18, 2021. Along with Georgia, Austin will visit allies in Ukraine, Romania to reaffirm U.S. support for sovereignty and territorial integrity and underscore the importance of the strategic partnerships in addressing regional and global security challenges. Austin will also travel to Brussels, Belgium to participate in the NATO Defense Ministerial. (DoD photo by Chad J. McNeeley)
google cta
Analysis | Europe
Gaza tent city
Top photo credit: Palestinian Mohammed Abu Halima, 43, sits in front of his tent with his children in a camp for displaced Palestinians in Gaza City, Gaza, on December 11, 2025. Matrix Images / Mohammed Qita

Four major dynamics in Gaza War that will impact 2026

Middle East

Just ahead of the New Year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to visit President Donald Trump in Florida today, no doubt with a wish list for 2026. Already there have been reports that he will ask Trump to help attack Iran’s nuclear program, again.

Meanwhile, despite the media narrative, the war in Gaza is not over, and more specifically, it has not ended in a clear victory for Netanyahu’s IDF forces. Nor has the New Year brought solace to the Palestinians — at least 71,000 have been killed since October 2023. But there have been a number of important dynamics and developments in 2025 that will affect not only Netanyahu’s “asks” but the future of security in Israel and the region.

keep readingShow less
Sokoto Nigeria
Top photo credit: Map of Nigeria (Shutterstock/Juan Alejandro Bernal)

Trump's Christmas Day strikes on Nigeria beg question: Why Sokoto?

Africa

For the first time since President Trump publicly excoriated Nigeria’s government for allegedly condoning a Christian genocide, Washington made good on its threat of military action on Christmas Day when U.S. forces conducted airstrikes against two alleged major positions of the Islamic State (IS-Sahel) in northwestern Sokoto state.

According to several sources familiar with the operation, the airstrike involved at least 16 GPS-guided munitions launched from the Navy destroyer, USS Paul Ignatius, stationed in the Gulf of Guinea. Debris from unexpended munition consistent with Tomahawk cruise missile components have been recovered in the village of Jabo, Sokoto state, as well nearly 600 miles away in Offa in Kwara state.

keep readingShow less
What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?
Top image credit: Voodison328 via shutterstock.com

What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?

Global Crises

Earlier this month in Geneva, delegates to the Antipersonnel Mine Ban Treaty’s 22nd Meeting of States Parties confronted the most severe crisis in the convention’s nearly three-decade history. That crisis was driven by an unprecedented convergence of coordinated withdrawals by five European states and Ukraine’s attempt to “suspend” its treaty obligations amid an ongoing armed conflict.

What unfolded was not only a test of the resilience of one of the world’s most successful humanitarian disarmament treaties, but also a critical moment for the broader system of international norms designed to protect civilians during and after war. Against a background of heightened tensions resulting from the war in Ukraine and unusual divisions among the traditional convention champions, the countries involved made decisions that will have long-term implications.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.