Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1895189473-scaled

Blinken: No, US won't play politics with vaccine distribution

The secretary of state dismissed an idea from Rep. Ted Lieu that we should help "allies first," and took a jab at China.

Asia-Pacific

Secretary of State Antony Blinken denied that American vaccine donations are tied to political conditions at a congressional hearing Monday.

American vaccines will be sent to countries “where there’s surges, where there’s variants, where some countries need second shots and have a deficit,” Blinken told the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “All of this [is] based on science, based on equity, and without political favor being demanded in return, unlike some other countries.”

Blinken’s comments were a jab at China, as well as members of his own party.

The Chinese government has been accused of politicizing the vaccine. Honduras and Paraguay say that Beijing offered them doses in exchange for cutting their diplomatic ties with Taiwan, and the Taiwanese government has accused mainland China of putting up political roadblocks to its own vaccination program. China denies both allegations.

Last week, Rep. Ted Lieu (D–Calif.) had also proposed using vaccines as a political reward.

“I strongly disagree with the Biden Administration on their global vaccine rollout. We should help our allies first instead of letting a third party decide where vaccines should go,” Lieu wrote on Twitter. “Since there are not enough vaccines, should we help India or Iran? We should help India first.”

The White House had announced earlier that day that the United States plans to donate 80 million coronavirus vaccine doses by the end of June. Out of the first 25 million doses, a quarter of them are being sent directly to countries in need, and three quarters of them are being distributed through the international COVAX program.

Lieu’s comments were criticized by anti-discrimination groups, as well the Quincy Institute’s own grand strategy director Stephen Wertheim. It was unclear why Lieu decided to use Iran as an example, as it was not on the list of countries set to receive the first 25 million doses.

With Blinken’s comments on Monday, the Biden administration indicated that it does not want to turn vaccines into an explicit political football.

“If we stayed on the current course — before we were distributing the 80 million, before we were looking at increasing production around the world, not just in the United States — we're on track to have the world vaccinated, or at least to have 75 percent or so of the world vaccinated, not until 2024,” Blinken said. “Even if we're fully vaccinated, that doesn't do it, because variants start to perk up.”


MUMBAI-INDIA - January 16, 2021: A medical worker inoculates Vidya Thakur (R), medical dean of the Rajawadi Hospital, with a Covid-19 coronavirus vaccine at the hospital (Photo: Manoej Paateel via shutterstock.com)
Asia-Pacific
Mark Levin
Top photo credit: Erick Stakelbeck on TBN/Screengrab

The great fade out: Neocon influencers rage as they diminish

Media

Mark Levin appears to be having a meltdown.

The veteran neoconservative talk host is repulsed by reports that President Donald Trump might be inching closer to an Iranian nuclear deal, reducing the likelihood of war. In addition to his rants on how this would hurt Israel, Levin has been howling to anyone who will listen that any deal with Iran needs approval from Congress (funny he doesn’t have the same attitude for waging war, only for making peace).

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.