Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1895189473-scaled

Blinken: No, US won't play politics with vaccine distribution

The secretary of state dismissed an idea from Rep. Ted Lieu that we should help "allies first," and took a jab at China.

Asia-Pacific
google cta
google cta

Secretary of State Antony Blinken denied that American vaccine donations are tied to political conditions at a congressional hearing Monday.

American vaccines will be sent to countries “where there’s surges, where there’s variants, where some countries need second shots and have a deficit,” Blinken told the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “All of this [is] based on science, based on equity, and without political favor being demanded in return, unlike some other countries.”

Blinken’s comments were a jab at China, as well as members of his own party.

The Chinese government has been accused of politicizing the vaccine. Honduras and Paraguay say that Beijing offered them doses in exchange for cutting their diplomatic ties with Taiwan, and the Taiwanese government has accused mainland China of putting up political roadblocks to its own vaccination program. China denies both allegations.

Last week, Rep. Ted Lieu (D–Calif.) had also proposed using vaccines as a political reward.

“I strongly disagree with the Biden Administration on their global vaccine rollout. We should help our allies first instead of letting a third party decide where vaccines should go,” Lieu wrote on Twitter. “Since there are not enough vaccines, should we help India or Iran? We should help India first.”

The White House had announced earlier that day that the United States plans to donate 80 million coronavirus vaccine doses by the end of June. Out of the first 25 million doses, a quarter of them are being sent directly to countries in need, and three quarters of them are being distributed through the international COVAX program.

Lieu’s comments were criticized by anti-discrimination groups, as well the Quincy Institute’s own grand strategy director Stephen Wertheim. It was unclear why Lieu decided to use Iran as an example, as it was not on the list of countries set to receive the first 25 million doses.

With Blinken’s comments on Monday, the Biden administration indicated that it does not want to turn vaccines into an explicit political football.

“If we stayed on the current course — before we were distributing the 80 million, before we were looking at increasing production around the world, not just in the United States — we're on track to have the world vaccinated, or at least to have 75 percent or so of the world vaccinated, not until 2024,” Blinken said. “Even if we're fully vaccinated, that doesn't do it, because variants start to perk up.”


MUMBAI-INDIA - January 16, 2021: A medical worker inoculates Vidya Thakur (R), medical dean of the Rajawadi Hospital, with a Covid-19 coronavirus vaccine at the hospital (Photo: Manoej Paateel via shutterstock.com)
google cta
Asia-Pacific
Tony Blair Gaza
Top photo credit: Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair attends a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a U.S.-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, October 13, 2025. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/Pool/File Photo

Phase farce: No way 'Board of Peace' replaces reality in Gaza

Middle East

The Trump administration’s announcements about the Gaza Strip would lead one to believe that implementation of President Trump’s 20-point peace plan, later largely incorporated into a United Nations Security Council resolution, is progressing quite smoothly.

As such, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff announced this month on social media the “launch of Phase Two” of the plan, “moving from ceasefire to demilitarization, technocratic governance, and reconstruction.” But examination of even just a couple of Witkoff’s assertions in his announcement shows that "smooth" or even "implementation" are bitter overstatements.

keep readingShow less
Trump Polk
Top image credit: Samuele Wikipediano 1348 via wikimedia commons/lev radin via shutterstock.com

On Greenland, Trump wants to be like Polk

Washington Politics

Any hopes that Wednesday’s meeting of Greenland and Denmark’s foreign ministers with Vice President Vance and Secretary Rubio might point toward an end of the Trump administration’s attempts to annex the semiautonomous arctic territory were swiftly disappointed. “Fundamental disagreement” remains, according to Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen.

That these talks would yield no hint of a resolution should not be surprising. Much of Trump’s stated rationale for seeking ownership of Greenland — the need for an increased U.S. military presence, the ability to access the island’s critical mineral deposits, or the alleged imperative to keep the Chinese and Russians at bay — is eminently negotiable and even achievable under the status quo. If these were the president’s real goals he likely could have reached an agreement with Denmark months ago. That this standoff persists is a testament to Trump’s true motive: ownership for its own sake.

keep readingShow less
Swedish military Greenland

Top photo credit: HAGSHULT, SWEDEN- 7 MAY 2024: Military guards during the US Army exercise Swift Response 24 at the Hagshult base, Småland county, Sweden, during Tuesday. (Shutterstock/Sunshine Seeds)

Trump digs in as Europe sends troops to Greenland

Europe

Wednesday’s talks between American, Danish, and Greenlandic officials exposed the unbridgeable gulf between President Trump’s territorial ambitions and respect for sovereignty.

Trump now claims the U.S. needs Greenland to support the Golden Dome missile defense initiative. Meanwhile, European leaders are sending a small number of troops to Greenland.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.