Follow us on social

US Capitol

US lawmakers blast Israel, urge against war with Iran​

Politicians across the political spectrum say Washington shouldn’t get more involved than it already is

Reporting | QiOSK

Responding to Israel’s attack on Iran last night, which targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities, scientists, and key military leaders, U.S. lawmakers across the political spectrum are urging the Trump administration to show restraint and not allow the U.S. to get involved any more than it already is.

“Israel doesn’t need US taxpayers’ money for defense if it already has enough to start offensive wars,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) wrote on X. “I vote not to fund this war of aggression.”

“Netanyahu’s reckless strike risks provoking a wider war and pulling in the United States."

Trump must oppose Netanyahu’s escalation and pursue a diplomatic path to deal with Iran’s nuclear program,” Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) wrote on X. “Trump must not violate the Constitution by involving American troops in Netanyahu’s war without coming to Congress.”

“This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict. A war between Israel and Iran may be good for Netanyahu’s domestic politics, but it will likely be disastrous for both the security of Israel, the United States, and the rest of the region,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said in a statement. “As Secretary Rubio stated, the United States was not involved in today's strikes, and we have no obligation to follow Israel into a war we did not ask for and will make us less safe.”

Members are particularly concerned that the U.S. will move to defend Israel if Iran retaliates and furthermore acts in tandem to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Trump told Fox News last night that the U.S. is ready to defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates.

“The president cannot circumvent congressional war powers and unilaterally send U.S. troops to war with Iran. This is a violation of Article I of the Constitution which requires congressional approval to declare war,” Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D- Mich.) said. “The American people do not want another endless war in the Middle East that will cost lives and tear their families apart.”

“The American people overwhelming[ly] oppose our endless wars, and they voted that way when they voted for Donald Trump in 2024. I urge President Trump to stay the course, keep putting America first, and to not join in any war between other countries,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wrote on X. “Every American should hope and pray for peace.”

Members pointed out that the strikes came as the U.S. was pursuing diplomacy with Iran over its nuclear deal, a path that seems uncertain today.

“Just as talks with Iran were set to resume, Netanyahu launches a strike and declares a state of emergency. He is provoking a war Americans don't want,” said Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.). “We should not allow ourselves to be dragged into yet another conflict, against our will, by a foreign leader pursuing his own agenda of death and destruction.”

"I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend. These talks are the only viable and sustainable path to curtailing Iran’s development of nuclear weapons and protecting U.S. national security interests in the region," Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a member of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees, said in a statement.

"We must always defend U.S. personnel and assets against those who might seek to harm us, but the American people have no interest in another forever war," Kaine stressed.

Israel alleges its attack, which a source told Axios “had a clear U.S. green light," is part of an operation necessary to take out Iran’s nuclear program before it can facilitate the creation of nuclear weapons, which Israel perceives as an existential threat. In this respect, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel will fight Iran for “as many days as it takes.”

Yet, during the Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community in late March, Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) Director Tulsi Gabbard said that the intelligence community “continue[d] to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.”

Moreover, experts believe that attacking Iran’s nuclear program militarily will convince Iran’s leadership to build a nuclear weapon, an outcome the attack was supposedly meant to prevent.

Israel is widely understood to possess nuclear weapons.

A majority of Americans, including nearly two-thirds of Republicans, support negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program over a military action that would destroy it.

“Israel's choice to bomb Iran puts us all at grave risk,” Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) wrote. “We must reject endless wars, prioritize diplomacy, and act to honor our shared humanity.”


Top Image Credit: (shutterstock/trekandshoot)
Reporting | QiOSK
POGO The Bunker
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

Are American 'boomers' at risk?

Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.


keep readingShow less
Nuclear explosion
Top image credit: Let’s curb loose talk of using lower-yield nuclear weapons

Reckless posturing: Trump says he wants to resume nuke testing

Global Crises

President Donald Trump’s October 29 announcement that the United States will restart nuclear weapons testing after more than 30 years marks a dangerous turning point in international security.

The decision lacks technical justification and appears solely driven by geopolitical posturing.

keep readingShow less
Sudan al-Fashir El Fasher
Top photo credit: The grandmother of Ikram Abdelhameed looks on next to her family while sitting at a camp for displaced people who fled from al-Fashir to Tawila, North Darfur, Sudan, October 27, 2025. REUTERS/Mohammed Jamal

Sudan's bloody war is immune to Trump's art of the deal

Africa

For over 500 days, the world watched as the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) methodically strangled the last major army garrison in Darfur through siege, starvation, and indiscriminate bombardment. Now, with the RSF’s declaration of control over the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) Sixth Infantry Division headquarters in El Fasher, that strategy has reached its grim conclusion.

The capture of the historic city is a significant military victory for the RSF and its leader, Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, though it is victory that has left at least 1,500 civilians dead, including 100 patients in one hospital. It is one that formalizes the de facto partition of the country, with the RSF consolidating its control over all of Darfur, and governing from its newly established parallel government in Nyala, South Darfur.

The SAF-led state meanwhile, clings to the riverine center and the east from Port Sudan.

The Trump administration’s own envoy has now publicly voiced this fear, with the president’s senior adviser for Africa Massad Boulos warning against a "de facto situation on the ground similar to what we’ve witnessed in Libya.”

The fall of El Fasher came just a day after meetings of the so‑called “Quad,” a diplomatic forum which has brought together the United States, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates in Washington. As those meetings were underway, indirect talks were convened in the U.S. capital between a Sudanese government delegation led by Sudan’s foreign minister, and an RSF delegation headed by Algoney Dagalo, the sanctioned paramilitary’s procurement chief and younger brother of its leader.

The Quad’s joint statement on September 12, which paved the way for these developments by proposing a three-month truce and a political process, was hailed as a breakthrough. In reality, it was a paper-thin consensus among states actively fueling opposite sides of the conflict; it was dismissed from the outset by Sudan’s army chief.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.