Follow us on social

google cta
US Capitol

US lawmakers blast Israel, urge against war with Iran​

Politicians across the political spectrum say Washington shouldn’t get more involved than it already is

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Responding to Israel’s attack on Iran last night, which targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities, scientists, and key military leaders, U.S. lawmakers across the political spectrum are urging the Trump administration to show restraint and not allow the U.S. to get involved any more than it already is.

“Israel doesn’t need US taxpayers’ money for defense if it already has enough to start offensive wars,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) wrote on X. “I vote not to fund this war of aggression.”

“Netanyahu’s reckless strike risks provoking a wider war and pulling in the United States."

Trump must oppose Netanyahu’s escalation and pursue a diplomatic path to deal with Iran’s nuclear program,” Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) wrote on X. “Trump must not violate the Constitution by involving American troops in Netanyahu’s war without coming to Congress.”

“This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict. A war between Israel and Iran may be good for Netanyahu’s domestic politics, but it will likely be disastrous for both the security of Israel, the United States, and the rest of the region,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said in a statement. “As Secretary Rubio stated, the United States was not involved in today's strikes, and we have no obligation to follow Israel into a war we did not ask for and will make us less safe.”

Members are particularly concerned that the U.S. will move to defend Israel if Iran retaliates and furthermore acts in tandem to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Trump told Fox News last night that the U.S. is ready to defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates.

“The president cannot circumvent congressional war powers and unilaterally send U.S. troops to war with Iran. This is a violation of Article I of the Constitution which requires congressional approval to declare war,” Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D- Mich.) said. “The American people do not want another endless war in the Middle East that will cost lives and tear their families apart.”

“The American people overwhelming[ly] oppose our endless wars, and they voted that way when they voted for Donald Trump in 2024. I urge President Trump to stay the course, keep putting America first, and to not join in any war between other countries,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wrote on X. “Every American should hope and pray for peace.”

Members pointed out that the strikes came as the U.S. was pursuing diplomacy with Iran over its nuclear deal, a path that seems uncertain today.

“Just as talks with Iran were set to resume, Netanyahu launches a strike and declares a state of emergency. He is provoking a war Americans don't want,” said Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.). “We should not allow ourselves to be dragged into yet another conflict, against our will, by a foreign leader pursuing his own agenda of death and destruction.”

"I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend. These talks are the only viable and sustainable path to curtailing Iran’s development of nuclear weapons and protecting U.S. national security interests in the region," Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a member of the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees, said in a statement.

"We must always defend U.S. personnel and assets against those who might seek to harm us, but the American people have no interest in another forever war," Kaine stressed.

Israel alleges its attack, which a source told Axios “had a clear U.S. green light," is part of an operation necessary to take out Iran’s nuclear program before it can facilitate the creation of nuclear weapons, which Israel perceives as an existential threat. In this respect, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel will fight Iran for “as many days as it takes.”

Yet, during the Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community in late March, Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) Director Tulsi Gabbard said that the intelligence community “continue[d] to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.”

Moreover, experts believe that attacking Iran’s nuclear program militarily will convince Iran’s leadership to build a nuclear weapon, an outcome the attack was supposedly meant to prevent.

Israel is widely understood to possess nuclear weapons.

A majority of Americans, including nearly two-thirds of Republicans, support negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program over a military action that would destroy it.

“Israel's choice to bomb Iran puts us all at grave risk,” Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) wrote. “We must reject endless wars, prioritize diplomacy, and act to honor our shared humanity.”


Top Image Credit: (shutterstock/trekandshoot)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.