Follow us on social

google cta
Texas floods disaster relief

America last: Trump demands states support Israel or risk disaster relief

FEMA money to be contingent on pledge against any boycotts or divestment of Israeli companies

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

UPDATE 8/4 10:20 PM: The DHS removed language explicitly blocking federal disaster relief funding to states allowing boycotts of Israel in its FY2025 standard terms and conditions document, but clarified on X that it could still deny funding on these grounds.

The Trump administration announced today that American states and cities boycotting Israeli companies will not receive natural disaster funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

To be eligible for $1.9 billion available in federal grants from FEMA for disaster preparation essentials, including emergency management salaries and rescue gear, U.S. states and cities must agree that they will not cut off “commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies.”

In essence, signing a loyalty oath to another country.

“DHS will enforce all anti-discrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS movement, which is expressly grounded in antisemitism,” a spokesperson for Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem said.

Back in April, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees FEMA, announced that states and cities receiving its funding cannot boycott Israel.

Today, 34 states have laws or policies against Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) already in place, making today’s development a largely symbolic one.

There are currently no states that actively “boycott” Israel, though a handful of cities have moved toward passing laws cutting off business with Israel or companies that do business with Israel over humanitarian concerns. For example, Portland, Maine voted in September 2024 to divest from companies doing business with Israel, citing the humanitarian crisis Israel has caused in the Gaza Strip. And the city of New Orleans passed, but rescinded soon after, similar legislation back in January 2018, years before the current war.

Observers contend today’s move by the White House, which makes critical disaster relief (paid for by American taxpayers) contingent on Israel support, showcases the extent to which the Trump administration backs Israel amid its longstanding war on the Gaza Strip, which has killed more than 60,000 people and created famine-like conditions there.

"Tying disaster assistance to a state or city's stance on Israel demonstrates that the Trump administration has abandoned ‘America First’ in favor of ‘Israel First,’” Quincy Institute Middle East Program Research Fellow Annelle Sheline told RS. “Yet it also highlights the desperation of the pro-Israel lobby: if American communities have to be forced to support Israel, such support is not viable for the long-term."

Josh Paul, the co-founder and Director of Washington-based think tank A New Policy, similarly told RS the move places Israel over Americans' well-being.

“When the next flood, or fire, or earthquake hits, the U.S. government will have to explain to Americans whose homes and lives have been devastated by disaster that the funding was not available to avert the catastrophe because the Trump Administration placed Israel's economic interests above the well-being of American citizens,” Paul said.

The move to block federal disaster preparation funding from states and cities divesting from Israel comes amid growing international outrage over the worsening humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, and recently announced intentions by Western countries, including the UK, France and Canada, to recognize the state of Palestine.

Trump said last week at a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he did not mind if Starmer supported Palestinian statehood, but that he would not take a stance on that issue himself. However, Trump did say Canada moving to recognize Palestinian statehood could make a trade agreement between the two countries “very hard” to reach Thursday.


Top Image Credit: Over 100 killed in Texas flooding, officials report/ KREM 2 News, August 2, 2025 (YouTube/Screenshot)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Tehran, Iran strikes
Top Image Credit: People run as smoke rises following an explosion, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 5, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency)

US used 'Claude' to strike over 1000 targets in first 24 hours of war

QiOSK

Despite a DoD ban on Anthropic over its demands that its tech not be used for fully autonomous military targeting, its AI model, Claude, is enjoying prime time use in the U.S. war on Iran.

Indeed, the U.S. military leveraged its AI targeting tools — which still employ Claude — to strike over 1,000 targets in Iran during the first 24 hours of the now rapidly expanding war.

keep readingShow less
Shanaz Ibrahim Ahmed iraq
Top photo credit: , First Lady of Iraq (Office of the First Lady)

Exclusive: Iraq's First Lady says 'this is not our war'

Middle East

As the conflict in the Middle East engulfs more countries, recent media reports alleging that the CIA is planning to arm Kurdish ground troops to spark an uprising in Iran have been met with vehement denials by Iraqi Kurdish officials.

However, while the Trump administration has denied that report, it is engaged in outreach to the various Kurdish groups to enlist their participation in an uprising against the Iranian regime. Meanwhile, after unconfirmed reports that some Kurdish groups were already engaging in cross-border attacks on Wednesday, the Iranians launched airstrikes at what they say are “anti-Iran separatist forces” in the mountains of Western Iran.

keep readingShow less
Macron Merz
Top image credit: EUS-Nachrichten / Shutterstock.com

France and Germany launch Europe's nuclear Plan B

Europe

Since early last year, France has been exploring with Germany and other partners the question of expanding or extending France’s nuclear deterrent to protect NATO partners in Europe.

This idea, in more modest versions advanced by France since the 1990s, always met resistance from traditionally Atlanticist Germany, concerned never to appear to doubt U.S. defense commitments to Europe. France itself has until now also been ambivalent about seeming to internationalize its force de frappe, conceived as the ultimate guarantor of France’s national territorial defense.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.