Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch Putin Trump Zelenskyy Ukraine

Diplomacy Watch: Ukrainians don’t want to fight anymore

Years at war have taken a human toll

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

After years of conflict, Ukrainians no longer want to fight.

Gallup polling published Thursday showed that Ukrainian support for the war effort has plummeted, where 69% of respondents want a negotiated end of the war as soon as possible. In contrast, only 24% said they want to continue fighting “until victory.”

The numbers contrast dramatically from Gallup polling taken at the start of the conflict in 2022, when 73% of Ukrainians said they supported fighting against Russia until victory was achieved.

The new Gallup polling, which surveyed Ukrainians last month, also suggests creeping pessimism, with 68% of respondents saying they found it unlikely that active fighting would end in the next year.

The new survey comes in the wake of the first major anti-government protests in Ukraine since the war began, with demonstrators signaling frustration with Zelensky over his now-nullified legislation that would have given Ukraine power over key anti-corruption agencies.

Broadly, Ukrainians have suffered tremendously since the war began in 2022. Tens of thousands of its troops have died and hundreds of thousands more have been injured fighting the Russian military. And frequent missile and drone attacks, especially in recent months, have caused heavy civilian casualties.

"There are thousands of young people dying, mostly soldiers, but also, you know, missiles being headed to Kiev and other places…it's a terrible situation,” President Trump said Wednesday, lamenting the heavy loss of life, especially experienced by young people.

To this end, independent activist and Quincy Institute non-resident fellow Almut Rochowanski told RS about her Ukrainian friends’ experience and what they have lost during the war.

Ukrainians “have lost so much they know they can never regain, especially if they have been displaced by occupation or because their beloved home towns have been wiped from the face of the earth. They cannot pass on their heritage, their community and traditions and identity, to the next generation. Millions of Ukrainians are now abroad, the most agile and productive among them, unlikely to ever return to live there,” Almut Rochowanski told RS.

“I've heard many of my Ukrainian friends speak about how they ask themselves whether this or that military gain would be worth the loss of their husband, brother, son or friend who is serving. Would any of us answer this question in the affirmative?,” she asked. “Over time, these thoughts and considerations have become more powerful and people also overcome the social desirability factor in public polls and will say what they really think.”

Rochowanski stressed that average Ukrainians’ views should be centered in negotiations toward peace.

In other Ukraine news this week:

Reuters reported Tuesday that Denmark, Norway and Sweden plan to provide about $500 million toward a NATO initiative that provided Ukraine with European-bought U.S. weapons, including Patriot missiles. These countries’ intended contribution is part of a $1 billion deal, where the Netherlands pledged the other $500 million.

On Sunday, The Hill reported that Trump claimed that nuclear submarines are "in the region" of Russia. The development follows a spat between Trump and former Russian president Medvedev last week, which led Trump to say he would send submarines there, but not specifying nuclear powered or nuclear armed, or where in the region they would go.

Trump hit India with 50% tariffs for buying Russian oil, where he slapped it with a 25% tariff Thursday after imposing a 25% tariff last week. On Tuesday, Trump told CNBC that India’s oil purchases from Russia are prolonging the conflict: "We settled on 25% [tariffs] but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil. They're fueling the war machine."

Reuters reported that U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Russian President Vladimir Putin for about three hours Wednesday. These talks have been considered productive; in their wake, a possible meeting between President Trump and Putin could take place as early as next week.

From State Department Press Briefing August 7

Asked about whether Trump would impose sanctions on Russia on Friday, State Department Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott said: “A lot of speculation involved there, I’m not going to get involved from there.” Trump threatened sanctions on Russia if 10 days passed without meaningful progress toward a negotiated end to the conflict; that “deadline” passes on Friday.

“It is a credit to [Trump’s] leadership that we've seen the engagement we have seen,” Pigott said broadly of recent diplomatic engagements. “The parties come to the table when they have come to the table, and [that there is] further engagement to try to pursue peace here.”


Top Photo: Trump, Zelenskyy, and Putin with Ukraine graphic. Credit, Khody Akhavi
Diplomacy Watch: Are Kyiv protests pent-up anger against Zelensky?
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?
Top image credit: Sens. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) sit look on during a congressional hearing in January, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)

Will Democrats pop Trump's $50 billion trial balloon for war?

Washington Politics

On Wednesday, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told CNN that he would support new funding for the U.S. war with Iran — but only if Israel and Arab Gulf states help pay for it.

“We’re using our taxpayer money to protect those countries,” Gallego said. “We’re using our men to protect these countries. They need to throw in and have skin in the game too.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.