Follow us on social

USS Carl Vinson

Deterrence or creep? US forces quietly surge back to Middle East

The military has significantly expanded its footprint, spurring questions about strategy and sustainability

Analysis | Middle East

Since October 7, 2023, the United States has quietly but significantly expanded its military presence across the Middle East, reversing the drawdown that followed its withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

U.S. troop numbers in the region have risen from approximately 34,000 to nearly 50,000 as of late 2024, a level not seen since the first Trump term, in addition to a rapid increase in naval and aerial deployments. This shift reflects a strategic recalibration that appears driven less by long-term planning than by an improvised response to perceived Iranian threats, instability in the Red Sea, and domestic political pressure to “do something” without committing to a full-scale conflict.

While these movements have mostly evaded public scrutiny, they mark a significant increase in the regional U.S. force posture. Among the most visible developments has been the deployment of three aircraft carrier strike groups to waters near Yemen: the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, the USS Carl Vinson, and the USS Harry S. Truman, as part of Operation Prosperity Guardian, a multinational task force launched in response to Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes.

These carriers have provided air cover for escalating strikes on Houthi targets and infrastructure following the group’s attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes in retaliation for Israel’s war in Gaza. Each carrier strike group also brings an escort of guided-missile cruisers and destroyers, layered with Aegis missile defense systems. Notably, the USS Carl Vinson brings with it a complement of 90 aircraft and 6,000 crew members, enhancing the U.S. Navy's operational capabilities in the region.

At the same time, six B-2 stealth bombers — representing nearly 30% of the U.S. Air Force's stealth bomber fleet — have been deployed to Diego Garcia, a remote but strategically located Indian Ocean base that offers a launchpad for long-range missions aimed at deterring Iran and projecting power over the Strait of Hormuz. It marks one of the largest such deployments to the base since the U.S. began building it in 1971.

There are also expanded deployments in Jordan and Cyprus that have been formalized through new agreements, as well as rotating Marine and Army units in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Approximately 13,500 U.S. forces are based in Kuwait, primarily at Camp Arifjan and Ali al-Salem Air Base, underscoring the strategic importance of these installations. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar and Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan have served as key nodes for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations, as well as F-15/F-16 sorties. The intensification of ISR operations reflects a shift toward persistent surveillance as a form of deterrence, with unmanned aerial systems and signal intelligence platforms operating across the Gulf and Levant.

In March 2025, the Pentagon launched Operation Rough Rider, a significant expansion of its campaign against Houthi-controlled territories in Yemen, using the pretext of anti-piracy and maritime security to justify high-casualty airstrikes on military and logistical targets. Dozens were reported killed in an April 18 strike on the Ras Isa fuel port, drawing condemnation from humanitarian groups and accusations of strategic overreach.

After Oct. 7, 2023, the Biden administration framed its Middle East deployments as reactive and defensive, aimed at protecting U.S. personnel and deterring Iranian proxies. But the pattern of force movement tells a more complicated story in which deterrence has increasingly become a doctrine of inertia.

Rather than reducing risk, the buildup conveys a constant readiness to escalate without a clear strategy or endgame. Washington is burning high-end military resources to intercept low-cost Houthi projectiles. Each Houthi drone may cost as little as $2,000, while a single U.S. interceptor missile — like a SM-6 or Patriot — can run over $4 million.

The result is a tactical loop: the Houthis bleed U.S. stockpiles without altering the strategic balance. In that sense, the most recent surge of U.S. power recalls the post-9/11 “presence-as-policy” paradigm, where military footprint substitutes for political strategy. Compounding the concern is CENTCOM’s growing operational autonomy with field commanders often acting ahead of or outside civilian diplomatic timelines, underscoring a dynamic in which military posture increasingly drives foreign policy, not the other way around.

The Trump administration may believe this buildup buys leverage in future Iran negotiations or protects regional allies from Iranian retaliation. But the risk of miscalculation is growing. As more assets are concentrated in volatile theaters, the risks of accidental escalation increase, especially given the proliferation of drone strikes, maritime incidents, and cyber operations. Examples of possible flashpoints: a January 2024 Houthi missile strike on the USS Laboon and an Iranian drone swarm near U.S. bases in Bahrain.

What’s less clear is how long this posture can be maintained: the financial cost, logistical burden, and strategic ambiguity raise questions about sustainability, both in Washington and among increasingly anxious allies.


Editor's note: This article has been updated to reflect the latest data in U.S. troop deployments in Middle East.


Top image credit: 250410-N-FS097-1573 U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (April 10, 2025) An F-35C Lightning II, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 97, launches from the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) during flight operations in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. (Official U.S. Navy photo)
Analysis | Middle East
Emmanuel Macron,  Keir Starmer, Friedrich Merz
Top image credit: TIRANA, ALBANIA - MAY 16: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz speak during a Ukraine security meeting at the 6th European Political Community summit on May 16, 2025 at Skanderbeg Square in Tirana, Albania. Leon Neal/Pool via REUTERS

The EU's pathetic response to Trump's Iran attack

Middle East

The European Union’s response to the U.S. strikes on Iran Saturday has exposed more than just hypocrisy — it has revealed a vassalization so profound that the European capitals now willingly undermine both international law and their own strategic interests.

The statement by the E3, signed by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and French President Emmanuel Macron, following similar statements by the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, and its high representative for foreign affairs Kaja Kallas, perfectly encapsulates this surrender.

keep readingShow less
iran war tehran
Top photo credit:A man reads a newspaper at a newsstand, amid the Israel-Iran conflict, in Tehran, Iran, June 22, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

Israel and US have chosen war, unleashing fresh economic pain

Middle East

The United States has finally entered Israel’s escalating war against Iran, launching targeted strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities to obliterate Tehran’s nuclear threat, a goal once more effectively achieved through the 2015 Iran deal.

President Trump warned Iran that there will be peace or a tragedy far greater than what Iran has witnessed in recent days, signaling that there were “other targets” if Iran wished to escalate.

keep readingShow less
Trump iran strikes
Top photo credit: A man on an e-scooter passes a giant billboard, where U.S. President Donald Trump appears, in Tel Aviv, Israel, June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Violeta Santos Moura

Short, sharp shock? Trump's idea of quick victory is illusory

Middle East

With the decision to bomb three of Iran’s nuclear sites, President Trump has put the United States on a reckless path that risks another Middle East war — precisely the kind he repeatedly promised to avoid.

Even if the strikes achieved short-term tactical success, they have turned a challenge that could have been managed diplomatically into a military crisis. Hitting a few facilities will not dismantle Iran’s nuclear program; it will only push it further underground and harden Tehran’s resolve, closing the door on a negotiated agreement with monitoring mechanisms like those in the JCPOA —the deal Trump abandoned after taking office the first time.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.