Follow us on social

USS Carl Vinson

Deterrence or creep? US forces quietly surge back to Middle East

The military has significantly expanded its footprint, spurring questions about strategy and sustainability

Analysis | Middle East

Since October 7, 2023, the United States has quietly but significantly expanded its military presence across the Middle East, reversing the drawdown that followed its withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

U.S. troop numbers in the region have risen from approximately 34,000 to nearly 50,000 as of late 2024, a level not seen since the first Trump term, in addition to a rapid increase in naval and aerial deployments. This shift reflects a strategic recalibration that appears driven less by long-term planning than by an improvised response to perceived Iranian threats, instability in the Red Sea, and domestic political pressure to “do something” without committing to a full-scale conflict.

While these movements have mostly evaded public scrutiny, they mark a significant increase in the regional U.S. force posture. Among the most visible developments has been the deployment of three aircraft carrier strike groups to waters near Yemen: the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, the USS Carl Vinson, and the USS Harry S. Truman, as part of Operation Prosperity Guardian, a multinational task force launched in response to Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes.

These carriers have provided air cover for escalating strikes on Houthi targets and infrastructure following the group’s attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes in retaliation for Israel’s war in Gaza. Each carrier strike group also brings an escort of guided-missile cruisers and destroyers, layered with Aegis missile defense systems. Notably, the USS Carl Vinson brings with it a complement of 90 aircraft and 6,000 crew members, enhancing the U.S. Navy's operational capabilities in the region.

At the same time, six B-2 stealth bombers — representing nearly 30% of the U.S. Air Force's stealth bomber fleet — have been deployed to Diego Garcia, a remote but strategically located Indian Ocean base that offers a launchpad for long-range missions aimed at deterring Iran and projecting power over the Strait of Hormuz. It marks one of the largest such deployments to the base since the U.S. began building it in 1971.

There are also expanded deployments in Jordan and Cyprus that have been formalized through new agreements, as well as rotating Marine and Army units in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Approximately 13,500 U.S. forces are based in Kuwait, primarily at Camp Arifjan and Ali al-Salem Air Base, underscoring the strategic importance of these installations. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar and Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan have served as key nodes for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations, as well as F-15/F-16 sorties. The intensification of ISR operations reflects a shift toward persistent surveillance as a form of deterrence, with unmanned aerial systems and signal intelligence platforms operating across the Gulf and Levant.

In March 2025, the Pentagon launched Operation Rough Rider, a significant expansion of its campaign against Houthi-controlled territories in Yemen, using the pretext of anti-piracy and maritime security to justify high-casualty airstrikes on military and logistical targets. Dozens were reported killed in an April 18 strike on the Ras Isa fuel port, drawing condemnation from humanitarian groups and accusations of strategic overreach.

After Oct. 7, 2023, the Biden administration framed its Middle East deployments as reactive and defensive, aimed at protecting U.S. personnel and deterring Iranian proxies. But the pattern of force movement tells a more complicated story in which deterrence has increasingly become a doctrine of inertia.

Rather than reducing risk, the buildup conveys a constant readiness to escalate without a clear strategy or endgame. Washington is burning high-end military resources to intercept low-cost Houthi projectiles. Each Houthi drone may cost as little as $2,000, while a single U.S. interceptor missile — like a SM-6 or Patriot — can run over $4 million.

The result is a tactical loop: the Houthis bleed U.S. stockpiles without altering the strategic balance. In that sense, the most recent surge of U.S. power recalls the post-9/11 “presence-as-policy” paradigm, where military footprint substitutes for political strategy. Compounding the concern is CENTCOM’s growing operational autonomy with field commanders often acting ahead of or outside civilian diplomatic timelines, underscoring a dynamic in which military posture increasingly drives foreign policy, not the other way around.

The Trump administration may believe this buildup buys leverage in future Iran negotiations or protects regional allies from Iranian retaliation. But the risk of miscalculation is growing. As more assets are concentrated in volatile theaters, the risks of accidental escalation increase, especially given the proliferation of drone strikes, maritime incidents, and cyber operations. Examples of possible flashpoints: a January 2024 Houthi missile strike on the USS Laboon and an Iranian drone swarm near U.S. bases in Bahrain.

What’s less clear is how long this posture can be maintained: the financial cost, logistical burden, and strategic ambiguity raise questions about sustainability, both in Washington and among increasingly anxious allies.


Editor's note: This article has been updated to reflect the latest data in U.S. troop deployments in Middle East.


Top image credit: 250410-N-FS097-1573 U.S. CENTRAL COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (April 10, 2025) An F-35C Lightning II, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 97, launches from the flight deck of the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) during flight operations in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. (Official U.S. Navy photo)
Analysis | Middle East
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.