Follow us on social

US sending more troops to the  Middle East

US sending more troops to the  Middle East

Now close to 50,000 American service members in the region as the threat of a wider war looms

Reporting | QiOSK

The U.S. is sending additional troops to the Middle East, according to Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, as increasing violence between Israel and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon this week threatens to boil over into all-out war.

“Out of an abundance of caution, we are sending a small number of additional U.S. military personnel forward to augment our forces that are already in the region,” Ryder said Monday at a press briefing at the Pentagon. He did not provide a number of troops or specify their assigned mission.

The Pentagon’s decision comes on the same day as Israel’s deadliest attack on Lebanon since the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War. The Lebanon Ministry of Public Health has reported over 490 deaths and 1,600 injuries from Israel’s 1,300 airstrikes on Monday morning — a number that will likely rise as rescue and recovery efforts continue.

For its part, Hezbollah fired a volley of rockets deep into Northern Israel on Sunday, some landing close to the city of Haifa.

The move to send more U.S. service members reflects a trend of steadily increasing the American military presence in the region since the start of the Israel-Hamas War on Oct. 7, 2023. According to AP, U.S. troop numbers jumped from around 34,000 before the war to 40,000 towards the end of 2023. Several weeks ago, that number rose to almost 50,000 when Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered two aircraft carriers and their warships to remain in the region.

These recent increases in the Middle East bring the total estimated number of American military personnel stationed outside U.S. borders above and beyond the 225,175 (of which 165,830 are active-duty) reported by the Department of Defense in June. Ryder’s comments on Monday emphasized the U.S. military’s swift increases in resources and personnel.

“We have more capability in the region today than we did on April 14th when Iran conducted its drone and missile attack on Israel,” Ryder said.

The influx of troops is intended to protect Israel as well as Washington's own assets, troops, and 19+ military bases in the region. The U.S. Navy has stationed itself along three sides of the Arabian Peninsula — with ships in the Gulf of Oman, the Red Sea and the eastern Mediterranean Sea — keeping a close eye on Iran and its proxies in Yemen, Gaza and Lebanon.


Initial arrival of personnel and equipment at an undisclosed location in response to the White House authorization of approximately 1,000 additional troops in U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility for defensive purposes to address air, naval, and ground-based threads in the Middle East. (DoD/public domain)

Reporting | QiOSK
remittance tax central america
Top photo credit: People line up to use an automated teller machine (ATM) outside a bank in Havana, Cuba, May 9, 2024. REUTERS/Alexandre Meneghini

Taxing remittances helps make US neighbors poorer, less stable

Latin America

Among the elements of the budget bill working its way through the U.S. Congress is a proposal for a 3.5% tax on all retail money transfers made by all non-citizens residing in the United States (including those with legal status) to other countries.

Otherwise known as remittences, these are transfers typically made by immigrants working in the U.S. to help support family back home.

keep readingShow less
US capitol building washington DC
Top image credit: U.S Capitol Building, Washington, DC. (Bill Perry /shutterstock)

Congress moves to put the brakes on Trump's unilateral bombing

Washington Politics

As a fragile ceasefire takes hold between Israel, Iran, and the United States, many questions remain.

With Iran’s nuclear program unquestionably damaged but likely not fully destroyed, will the Iranian government now race towards a bomb? Having repeatedly broken recent ceasefires in Lebanon and Gaza, will Prime Minister Netanyahu honor this one? And after having twice taken direct military action against Iran, will President Trump pursue the peace he claims to seek or once again choose war?

keep readingShow less
Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Ira
Top photo credit: Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran speaking at an event hosted by the Center for Political Thought & Leadership at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Israeli-fueled fantasy to bring back Shah has absolutely no juice

Middle East

The Middle East is a region where history rarely repeats itself exactly, but often rhymes in ways that are both tragic and absurd.

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the current Israeli campaign against Iran. A campaign that, beneath its stated aims of dismantling Iran's nuclear and defense capabilities, harbors a deeper, more outlandish ambition: the hope that toppling the regime could install a friendly government under Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran's last Shah. Perhaps even paving the way for a monarchical restoration.

This is not a policy officially declared in Jerusalem or Washington, but it lingers in the background of Israel’s actions and its overt calls for Iranians to “stand up” to the Islamic Republic. In April 2023, Pahlavi was hosted in Israel by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog.

During the carefully choreographed visit, he prayed at the Western Wall, while avoiding the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount just above and made no effort to meet with Palestinian leaders. An analysis from the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs described the trip as a message that Israel recognizes Pahlavi as "the main leader of the Iranian opposition."

Figures like Gila Gamliel, a former minister of intelligence in the Israeli government, have openly called for regime change, declaring last year that a "window of opportunity has opened to overthrow the regime."

What might have been dismissed as a diplomatic gambit has, in the context of the current air war, been elevated into a strategic bet that military pressure can create the conditions for a political outcome of Israel's choosing.

The irony is hard to overstate. It was foreign intervention that set the stage for the current enmity. In 1953, a CIA/MI6 coup overthrew Mohammad Mossadegh, Iran’s last democratically elected leader. While the plot was triggered by his nationalization of the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, the United States joined out of Cold War paranoia, fearing the crisis would allow Iran's powerful communist party to seize power and align the country with the Soviet Union.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.