Follow us on social

US sending more troops to the  Middle East

US sending more troops to the  Middle East

Now close to 50,000 American service members in the region as the threat of a wider war looms

Reporting | QiOSK

The U.S. is sending additional troops to the Middle East, according to Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, as increasing violence between Israel and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon this week threatens to boil over into all-out war.

“Out of an abundance of caution, we are sending a small number of additional U.S. military personnel forward to augment our forces that are already in the region,” Ryder said Monday at a press briefing at the Pentagon. He did not provide a number of troops or specify their assigned mission.

The Pentagon’s decision comes on the same day as Israel’s deadliest attack on Lebanon since the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War. The Lebanon Ministry of Public Health has reported over 490 deaths and 1,600 injuries from Israel’s 1,300 airstrikes on Monday morning — a number that will likely rise as rescue and recovery efforts continue.

For its part, Hezbollah fired a volley of rockets deep into Northern Israel on Sunday, some landing close to the city of Haifa.

The move to send more U.S. service members reflects a trend of steadily increasing the American military presence in the region since the start of the Israel-Hamas War on Oct. 7, 2023. According to AP, U.S. troop numbers jumped from around 34,000 before the war to 40,000 towards the end of 2023. Several weeks ago, that number rose to almost 50,000 when Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered two aircraft carriers and their warships to remain in the region.

These recent increases in the Middle East bring the total estimated number of American military personnel stationed outside U.S. borders above and beyond the 225,175 (of which 165,830 are active-duty) reported by the Department of Defense in June. Ryder’s comments on Monday emphasized the U.S. military’s swift increases in resources and personnel.

“We have more capability in the region today than we did on April 14th when Iran conducted its drone and missile attack on Israel,” Ryder said.

The influx of troops is intended to protect Israel as well as Washington's own assets, troops, and 19+ military bases in the region. The U.S. Navy has stationed itself along three sides of the Arabian Peninsula — with ships in the Gulf of Oman, the Red Sea and the eastern Mediterranean Sea — keeping a close eye on Iran and its proxies in Yemen, Gaza and Lebanon.


Initial arrival of personnel and equipment at an undisclosed location in response to the White House authorization of approximately 1,000 additional troops in U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility for defensive purposes to address air, naval, and ground-based threads in the Middle East. (DoD/public domain)

Reporting | QiOSK
Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare
Top photo credit: Seth Harp book jacket (Viking press) US special operators/deviant art/creative commons

Fort Bragg horrors expose dark underbelly of post-9/11 warfare

Media

In 2020 and 2021, 109 U.S. soldiers died at Fort Bragg, the largest military base in the country and the central location for the key Special Operations Units in the American military.

Only four of them were on overseas deployments. The others died stateside, mostly of drug overdoses, violence, or suicide. The situation has hardly improved. It was recently revealed that another 51 soldiers died at Fort Bragg in 2023. According to U.S. government data, these represent more military fatalities than have occurred at the hands of enemy forces in any year since 2013.

keep readingShow less
Trump Netanyahu
Top image credit: President Donald Trump hosts a bilateral dinner for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Monday, July 7, 2025, in the Blue Room. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

The case for US Middle East retrenchment has never been clearer

Middle East

Is Israel becoming the new hegemon of the Middle East? The answer to this question is an important one.

Preventing the rise of a rival regional hegemon — a state with a preponderance of military and economic power — in Eurasia has long been a core goal of U.S. foreign policy. During the Cold War, Washington feared Soviet dominion over Europe. Today, U.S. policymakers worry that China’s increasingly capable military will crowd the United States out of Asia’s lucrative economic markets. The United States has also acted repeatedly to prevent close allies in Europe and Asia from becoming military competitors, using promises of U.S. military protection to keep them weak and dependent.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Top image credit: lev radin / Shutterstock.com

Do we need a treaty on neutrality?

Global Crises

In an era of widespread use of economic sanctions, dual-use technology exports, and hybrid warfare, the boundary between peacetime and wartime has become increasingly blurry. Yet understandings of neutrality remain stuck in the time of trench warfare. An updated conception of neutrality, codified through an international treaty, is necessary for global security.

Neutrality in the 21st century is often whatever a country wants it to be. For some, such as the European neutrals like Switzerland and Ireland, it is compatible with non-U.N. sanctions (such as by the European Union) while for others it is not. Countries in the Global South are also more likely to take a case-by-case approach, such as choosing to not take a stance on a specific conflict and instead call for a peaceful resolution while others believe a moral position does not undermine neutrality.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.