Follow us on social

google cta
US sending more troops to the  Middle East

US sending more troops to the  Middle East

Now close to 50,000 American service members in the region as the threat of a wider war looms

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The U.S. is sending additional troops to the Middle East, according to Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, as increasing violence between Israel and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon this week threatens to boil over into all-out war.

“Out of an abundance of caution, we are sending a small number of additional U.S. military personnel forward to augment our forces that are already in the region,” Ryder said Monday at a press briefing at the Pentagon. He did not provide a number of troops or specify their assigned mission.

The Pentagon’s decision comes on the same day as Israel’s deadliest attack on Lebanon since the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War. The Lebanon Ministry of Public Health has reported over 490 deaths and 1,600 injuries from Israel’s 1,300 airstrikes on Monday morning — a number that will likely rise as rescue and recovery efforts continue.

For its part, Hezbollah fired a volley of rockets deep into Northern Israel on Sunday, some landing close to the city of Haifa.

The move to send more U.S. service members reflects a trend of steadily increasing the American military presence in the region since the start of the Israel-Hamas War on Oct. 7, 2023. According to AP, U.S. troop numbers jumped from around 34,000 before the war to 40,000 towards the end of 2023. Several weeks ago, that number rose to almost 50,000 when Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered two aircraft carriers and their warships to remain in the region.

These recent increases in the Middle East bring the total estimated number of American military personnel stationed outside U.S. borders above and beyond the 225,175 (of which 165,830 are active-duty) reported by the Department of Defense in June. Ryder’s comments on Monday emphasized the U.S. military’s swift increases in resources and personnel.

“We have more capability in the region today than we did on April 14th when Iran conducted its drone and missile attack on Israel,” Ryder said.

The influx of troops is intended to protect Israel as well as Washington's own assets, troops, and 19+ military bases in the region. The U.S. Navy has stationed itself along three sides of the Arabian Peninsula — with ships in the Gulf of Oman, the Red Sea and the eastern Mediterranean Sea — keeping a close eye on Iran and its proxies in Yemen, Gaza and Lebanon.


Initial arrival of personnel and equipment at an undisclosed location in response to the White House authorization of approximately 1,000 additional troops in U.S. Central Command's area of responsibility for defensive purposes to address air, naval, and ground-based threads in the Middle East. (DoD/public domain)

google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
James Holtsnider
Top image credit: James Holtsnider, U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be ambassador to Jordan, testifies before a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on nominations on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 11, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

New US ambassador's charm offensive is backfiring in Jordan

Middle East

Since arriving in Amman around three months ago to serve as the U.S. Ambassador to Jordan, James Holtsnider quickly became one of the highest-profile envoys in the Hashemite Kingdom. In addition to presenting his credentials to King Abdullah II, Holtsnider has met with Jordanian soccer players, attended weddings, and joined tribal gatherings.

However, a January 14 request by a U.S. Embassy delegation for the ambassador to offer condolences at the family home of former Karak mayor Abdullah Al-Dmour showed that many Jordanians have little interest in participating in Holtsnider’s public relations initiative. Dmour’s relatives rejected the U.S. ambassador’s wish to visit. Dmour’s tribe issued a statement noting Holtsnider’s request “violates Jordanian tribal customs, which separates the sanctity of mourning from any political presence with public implications.”

keep readingShow less
Trump Venezuela
Top image credit: President Donald Trump monitors U.S. military operations in Venezuela, from Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on Saturday, January 3, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Geo-kleptocracy and the rise of 'global mafia politics'

Global Crises

“As everyone knows, the oil business in Venezuela has been a bust, a total bust, for a long period of time. … We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country,” said President Donald Trump the morning after U.S. forces invaded Caracas and carried off the indicted autocrat Nicolàs Maduro.

The invasion of Venezuela on Jan. 3 did not result in regime change but rather a deal coerced at the barrel of a gun. Maduro’s underlings may stay in power as long as they open the country’s moribund petroleum industry to American oil majors. Government repression still rules the day, simply without Maduro.

keep readingShow less
Russian icebreakers
Top photo credit: Russian nuclear powered Icebreaker Yamal during removal of manned drifting station North Pole-36. August 2009. (Wikimedia Commmons)

Trump's Greenland, Canada threats reflect angst over Russia shipping

North America

Like it or not, Russia is the biggest polar bear in the arctic, which helps to explain President Trump’s moves on Greenland.

However, the Biden administration focused on it too. And it isn’t only about access to resources and military positioning, but also about shipping. And there, the Russians are some way ahead.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.