Follow us on social

google cta
|

US to build major new base near Gaza: Israeli media

America’s role in post-war governance of the enclave is rapidly growing

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The U.S. is planning to build a large new military base near Gaza for future use by an international peacekeeping force, according to Israeli news outlet Shomrim, which cited Israeli security sources.

The proposed base, which would reportedly cost $500 million and be capable of housing thousands of U.S. troops, would dramatically expand the American military’s presence in Israel. The plan also bolsters speculation that the Trump administration hopes to play a hands-on role in the stabilization and reconstruction of Gaza following reports about Washington’s growing contributions to aid provision and even housing development in the war-torn region.

The possibility of a major increase in America’s military presence near Gaza stands in stark contrast to President Donald Trump’s rhetoric on the campaign trail, according to Annelle Sheline of the Quincy Institute, which publishes RS. “Trump ran successfully on ending the forever wars in the Middle East,” Sheline said.

“Building a U.S. military base in historic Palestine is antithetical to the America First foreign policy he was elected to implement,” she added, noting that such a presence would endanger U.S. troops and increase “the possibility that the U.S. will take over Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine, potentially bogging us down in the region indefinitely.”

A Pentagon official described Shomrim's reporting as "inaccurate" in a statement to RS. "U.S. military personnel are currently working with international military partners to develop potential options for basing international troops that are part of a future International Stabilization Force," the official said. "To be clear, no U.S. troops will be deployed into Gaza. Any reporting to the contrary is false."

The exact timeline for construction is unclear, but American officials have already started scouting potential locations, according to Shomrim.

Sources in the Israeli military told the Jerusalem Post that they were unaware of or knew few details about the plan. The outlet speculated that the base could serve as a way for the U.S. to more effectively control events in Gaza and deal with various parties, including Hamas and Egypt, without having to coordinate with Israel.

The base would add to an already growing U.S. role in the reconstruction of Gaza. As Israeli forces have divided the region in two, American officials are now hoping to build housing for thousands of Palestinians on the Israeli side of the “yellow line” demarcating the two halves of the region, according to the Atlantic.

These “Alternative Safe Communities,” as U.S. officials reportedly call them, would only be accessible to Gazans approved by the Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence agency. The goal is for each settlement to include schools and a medical center in addition to housing for roughly 25,000 people. The State Department has already started awarding contracts to facilitate construction, including one to a U.S.-based company that will prepare the ground for the first town, the Atlantic reported.

American soldiers have also begun to increase their presence at a “coordination center” for aid based just outside of Gaza, according to the Washington Post.


Reports about the new U.S. base describe it as an effort to support a potential international coalition of peacekeepers in Gaza. But this wouldn’t necessarily be a United Nations-led force, as one would expect in most conflicts. While the Trump administration is seeking approval from the U.N. Security Council for a peacekeeping force, America’s proposal would place those troops under the authority of a Trump-led “Board of Peace,” according to Jewish Insider.


Top image credit: A U.S. Soldier, in the Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility, Jan. 17, 2021. The Soldiers are in Syria to support the Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve (CJTF-OIR) mission. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Jensen Guillory)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.