Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Diplomacy Watch: The White House now wielding ultimatums

Both Zelenskyy and Putin were on the receiving end of Trump’s ire this week

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The Trump administration has threatened to move on from negotiations to end the war in Ukraine after less than enthusiastic signals from Ukrainian leadership for President Trump’s plan for peace and Russia’s continued attacks on civilians in Ukraine.

Trump reportedly presented the plan to both parties earlier in the week, and afterward stated that Russian President Vladimir Putin was ready to accept the deal, but Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy was resisting, which left Trump “frustrated.”

“I think we have a deal with Russia,” Trump told reporters, while indicating that Zelenskyy has been “harder” to convince.

For his part, Zelenskyy told reporters he opposed the plan’s purported recognition of Russia’s annexation of Crimea, saying that it “violated our Constitution. This is our territory, the territory of Ukraine,” said Zelenskyy. Trump responded by stating that rejecting the deal would only “prolong the ‘killing field.’”

Whether Ukraine can legally recognize Russia’s annexation of Crimea may not matter, as the Trump team asserted that the United States could recognize Russia’s de jure annexation of Crimea without Ukraine having to do so as well.

Meanwhile, Trump is also criticizing Putin, and just not for his reaction to the peace deal. The Russian president was on the receiving end of Trump’s social media ire after Russia launched a deadly wave of attacks on Kyiv.

In its largest attack on the Ukrainian capital since last summer, Russia launched 70 missiles and 145 drones mainly towards Ukraine’s capital, claiming at least 12 lives and injuring 90 more.

“I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Let’s get the Peace Deal DONE!” the president said in a post on Truth Social.

“The Ukrainians have to go back home, they have to run it by their president, they have to take into account their views on all of this,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said of the plan. “But we need to figure out here now, within a matter of days, whether this is doable in the short term. Because if it’s not, then I think we’re just going to move on.”

Vice President JD Vance held a similar position when questioned by reporters. “We’ve issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and the Ukrainians, and it’s time for them to either say yes or for the United States to walk away from this process,” he said.

Anatol Lieven, Director of the Quincy Institute’s Eurasia Program, said that if Washington moves on, “Ukraine will have placed itself in a terribly precarious situation, and West European countries may face a choice between deep humiliation and immense danger. For if U.S. aid is withdrawn, Ukraine’s ability to hold its present line would be greatly reduced, and the chances of a Russian breakthrough greatly increased.”

Other Ukraine War News This Week

Al Jazeera reports that Putin is ready for direct talks with Zelenskyy. The Russian president told Russian TV that he has a “positive attitude towards any peace initiatives.” Zelenskyy indicated that Ukraine would be willing to participate in direct talks after the Easter truce expired. Neither side has held direct talks since February 2022.

Russia’s top security official, Sergei Shoigu indicated on Thursday that Russia could use nuclear weapons if Western nations acted aggressively toward Moscow. According to Reuters, Shoigu said that Russia’s amended nuclear doctrine would allow Moscow to consider a nuclear strike if Russia or Belarus received a conventional strike from an enemy that “created a critical threat to their sovereignty and (or) their territorial integrity.”

Zelenskyy has met with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa to discuss improving trade and ending the war. Al Jazeera reports that the Ukrainian president cut his visit to Pretoria short due to Moscow’s strikes on Kyiv. South Africa has remained neutral on the conflict, pushing for dialogue between parties.

From the State Department briefing on April 22nd:

During questioning by reporters, spokesperson Tammy Bruce confirmed that General Kellogg would participate in the most recent round of negotiations with Moscow, and that Secretary of State Rubio and Special Envoy Witkoff were not guaranteed to do so.

She also indicated that President Trump is optimistic about the potential to solve the Russia-Ukraine war diplomatically. “Both the Secretary (of State) and the President have said that this cannot be won militarily, and so they want diplomacy to work,” she told reporters.


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Diplomacy Watch: Minerals deal to occur next week
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.