Follow us on social

herese Kayikwamba Wagner Congo Trump White House

On a roll: Trump to host 5 African leaders this week

Critics would say this active interest in the continent is purely transactional. But to get to deals, there must be peace.

Reporting | QiOSK

Fresh from hosting the signing of a peace deal between the DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) and Rwanda last month, President Donald Trump will now welcome the leaders of five African countries at the White House for a U.S.-Africa mini-summit later this week

Critics would say this active interest in Africa is purely transactional. The question is, does it matter?

It is true that Trump wants to open up opportunities for American companies to tap into the plethora of critical natural resources found in abundance across the continent. These resources can be downstreamed in technology-heavy industries, such as electric vehicles and semiconductors, key to creating jobs in an advanced economy.

But to get to these opportunities there must be peace, which the Trump administration seems at this point committed to pursuing.

On June 27, the Trump administration brokered a peace deal between the DRC and Rwanda in the hopes of ending a decades-long war between the two neighbors. Although separate negotiations are currently ongoing in Doha, Qatar, between the DRC and the Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group that has spurred the recent increase in violence, this initial peace deal serves as hope that sustainable peace could soon be achieved.

Soon after this peace deal was struck in a signing ceremony in the Oval Office, it was reported that Trump’s Senior Advisor Massad Boulos — who served as the lead American diplomat in the negotiations between the DRC and Rwanda — will be leading the American effort to end the Sudan Civil War that has ravaged the country since April 2023. That war has led to the displacement of over 11 million people, and has turned into a complicated diplomatic imbroglio, with countries including Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Iran sending weapons to Sudan.

Former President Joe Biden, who was otherwise quite inactive on African affairs, tried unsuccessfully to bring about a long-lasting conclusion to the conflict.

This week’s summit in Washington will bring together the leaders of the West and Central African states of Mauritania, Senegal, Liberia, Guinea-Bissau, and Gabon. Though no schedule nor description of planned events or discussions have been publicly announced, the collection of Anglophone and Francophone countries are likely to discuss topics focused on enhancing business dealings with American companies and finding ways to increase trade between the five African countries and the United States.

Though security might come up, it is unlikely to be a central focus of the meetings. Despite the fact that West Africa is now more impacted by jihadi terrorism than any other part of the world, the countries visiting Washington have thus far avoided suffering serious security challenges from the jihadi groups expanding across North Africa and the Sahel.

Despite being relatively small, a couple of the countries visiting the United States are notable regional actors. Under President Bassirou Diomaye Faye, Senegal, for example, is leading the effort to quell the fallout from Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso’s decision to leave the regional community ECOWAS and form their own independent body known as the Alliance of Sahel States. Faye has conducted shuttle diplomacy between the countries and has sought ways to reintegrate them into the regional fabric.

Meanwhile, Mauritania is a major departure point for migrants looking to escape into the United States — a key issue for the American president, who has argued for stricter enforcement of the U.S. border and limitations on both legal and illegal migration into the United States.

This summit will likely serve as a close follow-on from the 13th annual U.S.-Africa Business Summit that concluded June 25 in Luanda, Angola. During the summit, $2.5 billion of new deals were announced between businesses and governments, including geopolitically significant projects such as a hydropower plant to be built along the Ruzizi River, which serves as the border between the DRC and Rwanda. The American company Anzana Electric will take a 10% percent stake in the project.

This week’s meetings also come before a full U.S.-Africa summit is expected to take place in New York City in September. This will be the first such convocation between the United States and African countries since Biden’s U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit was held in Washington in December 2022.


Top photo credit: US President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting ahead of peace signing ceremony with Democratic Republic of the Congo Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner (R) and Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe (2nd-L) in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, USA on June 27, 2025. (Reuters)
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.