Follow us on social

Gaza

Admin asked if US approves Gaza annex plan, says go ask Israel

As Jerusalem looks to change war tactics, Washington defers

Reporting | QiOSK

As reports bubble that Jerusalem is mulling annexing the Gaza Strip, the State Department is once again deferring to Israel.

RS asked the State Department Tuesday to confirm Haaretz reporting from Monday, where Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said that the administration approved possible plans to annex the Gaza Strip. The State Department Press Office responded simply, via email: “We’d refer you to Israeli officials.”

Al Monitor reported Tuesday that Israeli officials visited Washington to consult with the Trump administration to discuss the idea, along with over several possible proposals for Gaza’s future.

But U.S. support of such plans, including the annexation scheme, remain unclear.

Haaretz reported that Netanyahu told Israeli ministers that the Trump administration supports an annexation plan, where the Israeli Prime Minister said Ron Dermer, Israel's Minister for Strategic Affairs, shared the plan with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Asked Thursday whether the U.S. would support Israel annexing Gaza, State Department Deputy Spokesperson Tommy Pigott simply said, “I’m not going to speculate or preview where these discussions may go.”

The annexation murmurs come amid growing international outrage over Israel’s ongoing blockade resulting in starvation of the Gaza Strip — and comments from people like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), that signal there may soon be a major shift in Israeli strategy.

On Sunday, Graham suggested Israel would ramp up its military offensive against Gaza in a manner comparable to U.S. military actions during the Second World War, after which the territory could be given over to other Arabs to control. “They’re going to do in Gaza what we did in Tokyo and Berlin. Take the place by force and start over again, presenting a better future for the Palestinians, hopefully having the Arabs take over the West Bank and Gaza,” Graham said.

Ominously, Netanyahu himself wrote on X last week that, "together with our U.S. allies, we are now considering alternative options to bring our hostages home, end Hamas's terror rule, and secure lasting peace for Israel and our region.” In that statement, he stressed that “Hamas is the obstacle to a hostage release deal.”

Netanyahu did not clarify what those “alternative options” were.


Top Image Credit: Palestinians walk next to destroyed buildings and pools with stagnant water in Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 19, 2024. Editorial credit: Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com
Palestinians walk next to destroyed buildings and pools with stagnant water in Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip, on July 19, 2024. Editorial credit: Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump was right to block Taiwan president's transit through US
Top photo credit: Lai Ching-te (William Lai), the President of Taiwan pose with soldier during his inspection of the Navy's Taiwan-built Xu Jiang stealth missile corvettes in Keelung, Taiwan, in July 13, 2024. (JamesonWu1972/Shutterstock)

Trump was right to block Taiwan president's transit through US

Asia-Pacific

Earlier this week, the Financial Times reported that the Trump administration denied permission for Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te to transit the U.S. en route to his diplomatic trip to Latin America. The U.S. decision eventually led Lai to cancel his trip, according to the report.

The Trump administration’s blocking of Lai’s stopover has drawn criticism across Washington’s foreign policy establishment, including from think tank experts and former officials. Some critics stress the moral inadequacy of the decision, arguing that the U.S. should not be turning its back on Taiwan, a longtime democratic friend, particularly when the island is subject to increasing diplomatic and military pressure from China. Others point to the danger of eroding deterrence; that is, how Washington’s decision might signal weakness and embolden Beijing at a critical moment.

keep readingShow less
Ron Paul (R-Tx.) and John McCain (R-Az.)
Top Image Credit: US presidential candidate US Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) (L) makes his point as US Senator John McCain (R-AZ ) adjusts his shirt collar as they take part in the CNN/Los Angeles Times Republican presidential debate at Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California January 30, 2008. Air Force One used by Reagan is in background. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith (UNITED STATES) US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2008 (USA)

How Ron Paul took a battering ram to GOP foreign policy

Washington Politics

Ron Paul is turning 90 on August 20. At 72, he was a revolutionary.

Today, there is a raucous foreign policy debate within the Republican Party. Populist, realist and libertarian “America First” Republicans argue against endless wars and for fiscal responsibility, while holdover hawks continue to insist on a robust U.S. hand and military presence anywhere they can get it, no matter the cost.

keep readingShow less
British Royal Navy
Top photo credit: Launch of Duncan on the Clyde in Scotland MOD, Royal Navy, 2010. (Ian Arthur/MOD/Wikimedia)

Secretary's remark that UK 'will fight' China is a dip into crazy town

Asia-Pacific

Having spent the past decade telling the British public that Russia poses the biggest ‘immediate threat’ to the United Kingdom, the idea that Britain should get ready to fight China is idiotic and irresponsible.

During a visit to Australia to join HMS Prince of Wales, which is currently leading Carrier Strike Group 25 to Asia, UK Defense Secretary John Healey implied that the UK might be willing to fight China in the Pacific over Taiwan. “If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.”

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.