Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch Donald Trump Putin Zelensky

Diplomacy Watch: Trump changes tune, music to Zelensky’s ears

The president’s views on Putin shifted dramatically this week

Reporting | QiOSK

After recently deciding to withhold the shipment of certain weapons to Ukraine and opposing new sanctions on Russia, the Trump administration is seemingly reversing course following weeks of unproductive peace talks and multiple large-scale Russian bombardments on Ukraine.

On Tuesday, President Trump expressed deep frustration with President Putin following a lengthy phone call between the two.

“I’m not happy with Putin, I can tell you that much right now, because he’s killing a lot of people,” Trump said. “We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin. You want to know the truth? He is very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.”

Trump also said that Putin was “not treating human beings right,” and that Washington would be “sending some defensive weapons to Ukraine, and I’ve approved that.”

This dissatisfaction also comes as Russia has been pummeling Ukraine with some of its most intense attacks to date. In addition to starting its summer offensive in Ukraine, the Russian military launched 537 aerial weapons last Friday night and over 700 on Wednesday, with each attack resulting in civilian casualties.

The decision is a reversal in policy from earlier in the month when American stockpiles were running low. According to White House Spokesperson Anna Kelley, the decision to halt some shipments “was made to put America’s interests first following a review of our nation’s military support and assistance to other countries across the globe.”

“The Department of Defense is sending additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace,” said Pentagon Spokesperson Sean Parnell. Significantly, the administration is weighing sending a Patriot Air Defense system as part of the weapons package. This would be the first Patriot system provided to Ukraine under the Trump administration and the fourth that Kyiv has received from Washington overall.

In addition to approving further weapons shipments to Ukraine, the Trump administration has reportedly given its approval to a measure proposed by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), which would place wide-reaching sanctions on Russian officials and additional tariffs on countries that do business with the Kremlin.

Graham and his co-sponsor, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), said in a press release, “the dominating view in the United States Senate is that Russia is the aggressor, and that this horrific war and Putin’s aggression must end now and be deterred in the future.”

The bipartisan bill, which would impose 500% tariffs on certain nations, is gaining momentum and is expected to come to a vote in the Senate later this month, according to Senate leadership.

“The Senate will move soon on a tough sanctions bill – not only against Russia – but also against countries like China and India that buy Russian energy products that finance Putin’s war machine, Sen. Graham posted on X. “The Senate bill has a presidential waiver to give President Trump maximum leverage.

The bill isn't without its opponents, though. “The country that will be harmed the most under this legislation will be the United States, both economically and strategically,” wrote Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) in a piece for Responsible Statecraft. “If implemented, these tariffs would make U.S. trade with most of the world untenable, raise prices for American consumers, and risk further weakening the dollar.”

In other Ukraine War news this week:

The Wall Street Journal reports that France and the United Kingdom will begin to coordinate the usage of their nuclear weapons in defense of Europe. “Any adversary threatening the vital interests of Britain or France could be confronted by the strength of the nuclear forces of both nations,” said the French Ministry of Defense.

While in Malaysia for an ASEAN foreign ministers' meeting, Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. There, Lavrov presented new ideas regarding a peace deal to the United States. According to The Washington Post, Rubio expressed frustration in Moscow’s unwillingness to be flexible, but that the recent proposal was a “new and a different approach.”

Rubio didn’t offer any further details and cautioned that the deal wouldn’t necessarily “guarantee a peace.”

From this week’s State Department briefing:

Spokesperson Tammy Bruce fielded a question concerning Trump’s policy toward weapons shipments to Ukraine and the conflict in general, and confirmed Washington’s policy of supporting Ukraine. “We care about those people,” she said. “We care about making sure that they have what they need.” Bruce added that “the president feels obviously very passionate and determined regarding the ability of Ukraine to defend itself.”


Top Photo Credit: Diplomacy Watch (Khody Akhavi)
Diplomacy Watch: Did Israel’s war on Iran help Russia?
Reporting | QiOSK
'Security guarantees' dominate talks but remain undefined
Top photo credit: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy speaks during a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Finland's President Alexander Stubb amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. REUTERS/Al Drago

'Security guarantees' dominate talks but remain undefined

Europe

President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a host of European leaders in the White House Monday to discuss a framework for a deal to end the war. The big takeaway: that all parties appear to agree that the U.S. and Europe would provide some sort of postwar security guarantees to deter another Russian invasion.

What that might look like is still undefined. Trump also suggested an agreement would require “possible exchanges of territory” and consider the “war lines” between Ukraine and Russia, though this issue did not appear to take center stage Monday. Furthermore, Trump said there could be a future “trilateral” meeting set for the leaders of the U.S., Ukraine, and Russia, and reportedly interrupted the afternoon meeting with the European leaders to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the phone.

keep readingShow less
Zelensky White House Keith Kellogg
Top photo credit: Handout - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, left, speaks with U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Ukraine, Ret. General Keith Kellogg prior to their meeting, August 18, 2025 in Washington, D.C. Zelenskyy met with Kellogg before the planned meeting with President Donald Trump later in the day. Photo by Ukrainian Presidential Press Office via ABACAPRESS.COM

Zelensky White House meeting could spell end of the war

Europe

If Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky cannot agree in principle with the contours of a peace deal mapped out by President Trump, then the war will continue into 2026. I’d encourage him to take the deal, even if it may cause him to lose power.

The stakes couldn’t be higher ahead of the showdown in the Oval Office today between President Donald Trump and President Zelensky, supported by EU leaders and the Secretary General of NATO.

keep readingShow less
Congo Rwanda peace
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Democratic Republic of the Congo's Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner and Rwanda's Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington D.C., June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo

US companies rush into Congo before ink is dry on peace deal

Africa

On June 27, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda signed a peace agreement in Washington, brokered by the United States. About a month later, on August 1, they agreed to a Regional Economic Integration Framework — another U.S.-brokered initiative linking the peace process to cross-border economic cooperation.

All of this has been heralded as a “historic turning point” that could end years of conflict in eastern Congo between the M23 rebel movement, backed by Rwanda, and the Congolese state.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.