Follow us on social

google cta
nord stream pipeline explosions

Nord Stream explosions linked to Ukraine military but no one cares

The Germans have all but solved this 3-year mystery but the unmasking is largely being ignored because it doesn't fit the narrative.

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

After three years, the mystery of who sabotaged the Nord Stream pipelines in September 2022 has, for all intents and purposes, been solved.

But unlike the dramatic unmasking during a Scooby-Doo episode or the riveting declaration of "who done it" in front of a dinner party of sweating suspects in a Poirot mystery, the arrest of a former Ukrainian military officer accused of leading a team to sabotage the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines on Sept. 26, 2022, has landed like a cell phone going off in church — everyone hears something, but no one looks and pretends not to notice.

That is probably because while Ukrainians have been suspected for some time of being behind the explosions, which resulted in both pipelines — which had delivered some 35% of natural gas to Europe before the war — going off-line for the foreseeable future, it didn't truly fit the preferred narrative. When the incident happened three years ago the mainstream media along with world leaders and pundits everywhere rushed to blame Russia. It didn't matter that Russia was part owner of the pipelines and would be sabotaging its its own energy exports — Moscow was diabolical and must be doing this to send a message.

When the investigation starting going in the opposite direction, the Swedes stopped investigating. The case has been largely in the hands of the Germans, which in 2023 were reportedly on the trail of a Roman Chervinsky, —"a decorated 48-year-old colonel who served in Ukraine’s special operations forces" — as the coordinator but not the planner of a plot that involved a small, rogue group of saboteurs who took a small sailboat out into the Black Sea to plant the underwater explosives. Those reports indicated the plot went all the way up the chain to Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhniy, then-commander in chief of Ukraine’s armed forces.

The most recent news, reported on Friday, is of a one "Serhii K." — "a now-retired captain in Ukraine’s armed forces, previously served in Ukraine’s secret service SBU, as well as in an elite unit that defended Kyiv in the early months of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022" — who was detained on Aug. 18 while traveling with his family in Italy. He is accused of being recruited for the plot and leading the team of two soldiers and four civilian divers who sabotaged the pipelines. He is the "first" of the group to be arrested, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The paper says that German authorities have pieced together the contours of the "Operation Diameter":

The plot was developed by senior Ukrainian military and secret service officers under the command of a senior special forces general commanding the elite army unit.

The sabotage plan—internally code-named Operation Diameter—was ultimately overseen by the then-commander in chief of Ukraine’s armed forces, Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhniy, according to multiple people involved in or familiar with the mission.

President Volodymyr Zelensky was later informed and, after objections from the Biden administration, ordered Zaluzhniy to abort the mission. Nevertheless, the team proceeded, detonating the explosives on Sept. 26, 2022, an attack that set off years of international investigation and disrupted Europe’s energy markets.

The WSJ article does not mention Chervinsky or name him as the possible ex-special forces officer who recruited the team.

Both Zaluzhniy and Zelensky maintain they had nothing to do with the damage of the pipelines, after which the United States became a much bigger supplier of Liquid Natural Gas to European markets. "“The United States without a question (has benefited),” my colleague Anatol Lieven told me on the 1-year anniversary of the explosions. “It made it much more difficult for Germany to ever move back into an intensive energy relationship with Russia and made German and other European countries even more permanently dependent on imports of liquified natural gas from the United States.”

The legendary investigative journalist Sy Hersh had of course caused a seismic rumble himself when he reported in February 2023 that the U.S., under the authority of President Joe Biden, was responsible for the explosions. He has offered no further evidence or updates on that story, now more than two years old, though some still believe in the U.S. complicity, even going to far as to think the Ukrainian "team" is a cover for the real divers who planted the explosives that day. Hersh suggested as much in March 2023 when he said he believed the CIA was dispatched to concoct "a cover story" — an "alternate version" of events — "in an effort to discount the claim that Biden had ordered the pipelines’ destruction."

But there has been an arrest and the German authorities are calling this a "breakthrough" in the case. One thing has definitely been solved: that the elite establishment that rushed to blame Russia was dead wrong. Why no one cares to acknowledge that is well, not much of a mystery.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

Top photo credit: (a2iStokker/Shutterstock image)(9/26/22 Nord Stream pipeline explosion/Reuters)
(a2iStokker/Shutterstock image)(9/26/22 Nord Stream pipeline explosion/Reuters)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela
Top image credit: LightField Studios via shutterstock.com

Experts at oil & weapons-funded think tank: 'Go big' in Venezuela

Military Industrial Complex

As the U.S. threatens to take “oil, land and other assets” from Venezuela, staffers at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank funded in part by defense contractors and oil companies, are eager to help make the public case for regime change and investment. “The U.S. should go big” in Venezuela, write CSIS experts Ryan Berg and Kimberly Breier.

Both America’s Quarterly, which published the essay, and the authors’ employer happen to be funded by the likes of Lockheed Martin and ExxonMobil, a fact that is not disclosed in the article.

keep readingShow less
ukraine military
UKRAINE MARCH 22, 2023: Ukrainian military practice assault tactics at the training ground before counteroffensive operation during Russo-Ukrainian War (Shutterstock/Dymtro Larin)

Ukraine's own pragmatism demands 'armed un-alignment'

Europe

Eleven months after returning to the White House, the Trump administration believes it has finally found a way to resolve the four-year old war in Ukraine. Its formula is seemingly simple: land for security guarantees.

Under the current plan—or what is publicly known about it—Ukraine would cede the 20 percent of Donetsk that it currently controls to Russia in return for a package of security guarantees including an “Article 5-style” commitment from the United States, a European “reassurance force” inside post-war Ukraine, and peacetime Ukrainian military of 800,000 personnel.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.