Follow us on social

google cta
Is there a brewing crisis in the State Dept’s Mideast Bureau?

Is there a brewing crisis in the State Dept’s Mideast Bureau?

Trump may have yanked Joel Rayburn for being too hawkish on Syria, but now an Iran hawk is left guarding the hen house

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

President Donald Trump withdrew the nomination of Joel Rayburn to lead the State Department’s Near Eastern affairs bureau, leaving the office in the hands of a controversial interim leader.

The primary obstacle to Rayburn’s nomination appears to have been his role in the first Trump administration working under James Jeffrey, who later admitted to misleading Trump about the number of U.S. troops in Syria in an effort to prevent a military withdrawal from the country. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) grilled Rayburn in his confirmation hearing over his ties to Jeffrey, whose actions Paul described as “tantamount to treason.”

Rayburn also appeared to be at odds with the Trump administration’s broader approach to Syria. Under special envoy Tom Barrack, the U.S. has pushed hard to engage the government of President Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former jihadist fighter who claims to have moderated his views. U.S. efforts have included increased cooperation with Sharaa’s government on anti-ISIS measures as well as a full-court press in Congress to repeal crippling sanctions on Syria.

But Rayburn has been more skeptical of the potential fruits of engagement. Shortly after the fall of the Assad regime in December of last year, he tweeted that Sharaa “must be delusional” if he thinks Syrians will “sit still as he installs himself as another dictator in Assad’s place.” The Economist reported days later that Rayburn hoped to pressure Sharaa’s government by keeping sanctions in force. As of May, Rayburn remained one of the leading skeptics of engagement in Trump’s orbit, according to a CNN report. (Rayburn repeatedly insisted during his confirmation hearing that he would enact Trump’s policy toward Syria.)

The Trump administration has yet to give a reason for withdrawing Rayburn’s nomination. The decision to pull Rayburn from consideration comes just a week after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to advance his nomination to the full Senate.

The move contributes to a sense of uncertainty in the State Department’s Middle East bureau, which has experienced infighting under the leadership of Mora Namdar, who is serving as an interim leader for the office as she awaits confirmation to a consular position. Reports indicate that Namdar, an Iran hawk who worked in a media role in the first Trump administration, has elevated loyalists and sidelined more experienced diplomats.

“If you’re not inside her specific circle, you’re truly left out,” a source with knowledge of Namdar’s management style told RS, adding that Namdar’s “game of promotions and demotions” has “affected the morale of the NEA staff.”

“Instead of having experts in leadership positions, people who are either chummy with Mora or have specific ideological viewpoints end up being elevated over people who have done their time and their work in specific areas,” the source said. Notably, long-time State official Timothy Lenderking left NEA in August and moved to a less prominent bureau in the department, though it is unclear whether Namdar had a hand in that move.

In response to previous reporting on this topic, the State Department defended Namdar and said she is “elevating personnel who have proven that they have the merit, expertise and experience to best implement President Trump’s agenda.”

Namdar faced similar accusations during the first Trump administration, when she worked in the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which previously oversaw several U.S.-funded news sites. A State Department inspector general report found that, in order to justify the firing of several senior executives at USAGM, Namdar told an official to create a “risk profile” of the employees with “any negative information he had heard about the individuals, regardless of whether he could verify the information.” Namdar “told him to add even rumors that he ‘heard in the halls,’” according to the report.

While outside government, Namdar sharply criticized the Biden administration for attempting to negotiate with Iran, urging the U.S. to impose “sweeping sanctions” on Iranian officials, who she claimed were carrying out a “genocide” against the Iranian people. Earlier this year, anonymous officials accused Namdar of interfering in the collection of information about Iran, including one incident in which she ordered memos to be rewritten in order to be “more pessimistic toward the Iranian government’s prospects,” according to the Washington Post.

It remains unclear how long Namdar will remain in her interim position. Last week, she went before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a hearing about her nomination to serve as assistant secretary of state for consular affairs, but her confirmation to that position could still take months. In the meantime, Trump has yet to indicate who may replace Rayburn as the nominee for the influential job that Namdar now holds.


Top image credit: Joel Rayburn appears before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during his confirmation meeting in May, 2025. (Screengrab via senate.gov)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
New House, Senate attempts to preempt war with Venezuela
Top photo credit:
U.S. Navy Admiral Frank "Mitch" Bradley arrives for a classified briefing for leaders of the Senate Armed Services Committee on U.S. strikes against Venezuelan boats suspected of smuggling drugs, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., December 4, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

New House, Senate attempts to preempt war with Venezuela

Washington Politics

New bipartisan war powers resolutions presented this week in both the House and Senate seek to put the brakes on potential military action against Venezuela after U.S. President Donald Trump said a land campaign in the country would begin “very soon."

On Tuesday, Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), James McGovern (D-Mass.), and Joaquín Castro (D-Texas) introduced legislation that would “direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.”

keep readingShow less
Africa construction development
Top photo credit: Construction site in Johannesburg, South Africa, 2024. (Shutterstock/ Wirestock Creators)

US capital investments for something other than beating China

Africa

Among the many elements of the draft National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) currently being debated in Congress is an amendment that would reauthorize the Development Finance Corporation (DFC). What it might look like coming out of the Republican-dominated Congress should be of interest for anyone watching the current direction of foreign policy under the Trump Administration.

In contrast with America’s other major development agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which the administration has largely dismantled, President Donald Trump has expressed support for a reauthorized DFC but wants to broaden the agency’s mandate so that it focuses less on investing in traditional development projects and more on linking investment to national security priorities.

keep readingShow less
USS Lafayette (FFG 65) Constellation-class
Top image credit: Graphic rendering of the future USS Lafayette (FFG 65), the fourth of the new Constellation-class frigates, scheduled to commission in 2029. The Constellation-class guided-missile frigate represents the Navy’s next generation small surface combatant. VIA US NAVY

The US Navy just lit another $9 billion on fire

Military Industrial Complex

The United States Navy has a storied combat record at sea, but the service hasn’t had a successful shipbuilding program in decades. John Phelan, the secretary of the Navy, announced the latest shipbuilding failure by canceling the Constellation-class program on a November 25.

The Constellation program was supposed to produce 20 frigates to serve as small surface combatant ships to support the rest of the fleet and be able to conduct independent patrols. In an effort to reduce development risks and avoid fielding delays that often accompany entirely new designs, Navy officials decided to use an already proven parent design they could modify to meet the Navy’s needs. They selected the European multi-purpose frigate design employed by the French and Italian navies.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.