Follow us on social

Is there a brewing crisis in the State Dept’s Mideast Bureau?

Is there a brewing crisis in the State Dept’s Mideast Bureau?

Trump may have yanked Joel Rayburn for being too hawkish on Syria, but now an Iran hawk is left guarding the hen house

Reporting | QiOSK

President Donald Trump withdrew the nomination of Joel Rayburn to lead the State Department’s Near Eastern affairs bureau, leaving the office in the hands of a controversial interim leader.

The primary obstacle to Rayburn’s nomination appears to have been his role in the first Trump administration working under James Jeffrey, who later admitted to misleading Trump about the number of U.S. troops in Syria in an effort to prevent a military withdrawal from the country. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) grilled Rayburn in his confirmation hearing over his ties to Jeffrey, whose actions Paul described as “tantamount to treason.”

Rayburn also appeared to be at odds with the Trump administration’s broader approach to Syria. Under special envoy Tom Barrack, the U.S. has pushed hard to engage the government of President Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former jihadist fighter who claims to have moderated his views. U.S. efforts have included increased cooperation with Sharaa’s government on anti-ISIS measures as well as a full-court press in Congress to repeal crippling sanctions on Syria.

But Rayburn has been more skeptical of the potential fruits of engagement. Shortly after the fall of the Assad regime in December of last year, he tweeted that Sharaa “must be delusional” if he thinks Syrians will “sit still as he installs himself as another dictator in Assad’s place.” The Economist reported days later that Rayburn hoped to pressure Sharaa’s government by keeping sanctions in force. As of May, Rayburn remained one of the leading skeptics of engagement in Trump’s orbit, according to a CNN report. (Rayburn repeatedly insisted during his confirmation hearing that he would enact Trump’s policy toward Syria.)

The Trump administration has yet to give a reason for withdrawing Rayburn’s nomination. The decision to pull Rayburn from consideration comes just a week after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to advance his nomination to the full Senate.

The move contributes to a sense of uncertainty in the State Department’s Middle East bureau, which has experienced infighting under the leadership of Mora Namdar, who is serving as an interim leader for the office as she awaits confirmation to a consular position. Reports indicate that Namdar, an Iran hawk who worked in a media role in the first Trump administration, has elevated loyalists and sidelined more experienced diplomats.

“If you’re not inside her specific circle, you’re truly left out,” a source with knowledge of Namdar’s management style told RS, adding that Namdar’s “game of promotions and demotions” has “affected the morale of the NEA staff.”

“Instead of having experts in leadership positions, people who are either chummy with Mora or have specific ideological viewpoints end up being elevated over people who have done their time and their work in specific areas,” the source said. Notably, long-time State official Timothy Lenderking left NEA in August and moved to a less prominent bureau in the department, though it is unclear whether Namdar had a hand in that move.

In response to previous reporting on this topic, the State Department defended Namdar and said she is “elevating personnel who have proven that they have the merit, expertise and experience to best implement President Trump’s agenda.”

Namdar faced similar accusations during the first Trump administration, when she worked in the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which previously oversaw several U.S.-funded news sites. A State Department inspector general report found that, in order to justify the firing of several senior executives at USAGM, Namdar told an official to create a “risk profile” of the employees with “any negative information he had heard about the individuals, regardless of whether he could verify the information.” Namdar “told him to add even rumors that he ‘heard in the halls,’” according to the report.

While outside government, Namdar sharply criticized the Biden administration for attempting to negotiate with Iran, urging the U.S. to impose “sweeping sanctions” on Iranian officials, who she claimed were carrying out a “genocide” against the Iranian people. Earlier this year, anonymous officials accused Namdar of interfering in the collection of information about Iran, including one incident in which she ordered memos to be rewritten in order to be “more pessimistic toward the Iranian government’s prospects,” according to the Washington Post.

It remains unclear how long Namdar will remain in her interim position. Last week, she went before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a hearing about her nomination to serve as assistant secretary of state for consular affairs, but her confirmation to that position could still take months. In the meantime, Trump has yet to indicate who may replace Rayburn as the nominee for the influential job that Namdar now holds.


Top image credit: Joel Rayburn appears before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during his confirmation meeting in May, 2025. (Screengrab via senate.gov)
Reporting | QiOSK
Trump ASEAN
Top photo credit: U.S. President Donald Trump looks at Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., next to Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim when posing for a family photo with leaders at the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 26, 2025. Vincent Thian/Pool via REUTERS

‘America First’ meets ‘ASEAN Way’ in Kuala Lumpur

Asia-Pacific

The 2025 ASEAN and East Asia Summits in Kuala Lumpur beginning today are set to be consequential multilateral gatherings — defining not only ASEAN’s internal cohesion but also the shape of U.S.–China relations in the Indo-Pacific.

President Donald Trump’s participation will be the first by a U.S. president in an ASEAN-led summit since 2022. President Biden skipped the last two such summits in 2023 and 2024, sending then-Vice President Harris instead.

keep readingShow less
iran, china, russia
Top photo credit: Top image credit: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov and and Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi shake hands as Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu looks on during their meet with reporters after their meeting at Diaoyutai State Guest House on March 14, 2025 in Beijing, China. Lintao Zhang/Pool via REUTERS

'Annulled'! Russia won't abide snapback sanctions on Iran

Middle East

“A raider attack on the U.N. Security Council.” This was the explosive accusation leveled by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov this week. His target was the U.N. Secretariat and Western powers, whom he blamed for what Russia sees as an illegitimate attempt to restore the nuclear-related international sanctions on Iran.

Beyond the fiery rhetoric, Ryabkov’s statement contained a message: Russia, he said, now considers all pre-2015 U.N. sanctions on Iran, snapped back by the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) — the United Kingdom, France, Germany — “annulled.” Moscow will deepen its military-technical cooperation with Tehran accordingly, according to Ryabkov.

This is more than a diplomatic spat; it is the formal announcement of a split in international legal reality. The world’s major powers are now operating under two irreconcilable interpretations of international law. On one side, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany assert that the sanctions snapback mechanism of the JCPOA was legitimately triggered for Iran’s alleged violations. On the other, Iran, Russia, and China reject this as an illegitimate procedural act.

This schism was not inevitable, and its origin reveals a profound incongruence. The Western powers that most frequently appeal to the sanctity of the "rules-based international order" and international law have, in this instance, taken an action whose effects fundamentally undermine it. By pushing through a legal maneuver that a significant part of the Security Council considers illegitimate, they have ushered the world into a new and more dangerous state. The predictable, if imperfect, framework of universally recognized Security Council decisions is being replaced by a system where legal facts are determined by political interests espoused by competing power blocs.

This rupture followed a deliberate Western choice to reject compromises in a stand-off with Iran. While Iran was in a technical violation of the provisions of the JCPOA — by, notably, amassing a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (up to 60% as opposed to the 3.67% for a civilian use permissible under the JCPOA), there was a chance to avert the crisis. In the critical weeks leading to the snapback, Iran had signaled concessions in talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Cairo, in terms of renewing cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog’s inspectors.

keep readingShow less
On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants
Top Photo Credit: (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

On Ukraine and Venezuela, Trump needs to dump the sycophants

Europe

While diplomats labored to produce the Dayton Accords in 1995, then-Secretary of Defense Bill Perry advised, “No agreement is better than a bad agreement.” Given that Washington’s allies in London, Paris, Berlin and Warsaw are opposed to any outcome that might end the war in Ukraine, no agreement may be preferable. But for President Trump, there is no point in equating the illusion of peace in Ukraine with a meaningless ceasefire that settles nothing.

Today, Ukraine is mired in corruption, starting at the very highest levels of the administration in Kyiv. Sending $175 billion of borrowed money there "for however long it takes" has turned out to be worse than reckless. The U.S. national sovereign debt is surging to nearly $38 trillion and rising by $425 billion with each passing month. President Trump needs to turn his attention away from funding Joe Biden’s wars and instead focus on the faltering American economy.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.