Follow us on social

google cta
Is there a brewing crisis in the State Dept’s Mideast Bureau?

Is there a brewing crisis in the State Dept’s Mideast Bureau?

Trump may have yanked Joel Rayburn for being too hawkish on Syria, but now an Iran hawk is left guarding the hen house

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

President Donald Trump withdrew the nomination of Joel Rayburn to lead the State Department’s Near Eastern affairs bureau, leaving the office in the hands of a controversial interim leader.

The primary obstacle to Rayburn’s nomination appears to have been his role in the first Trump administration working under James Jeffrey, who later admitted to misleading Trump about the number of U.S. troops in Syria in an effort to prevent a military withdrawal from the country. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) grilled Rayburn in his confirmation hearing over his ties to Jeffrey, whose actions Paul described as “tantamount to treason.”

Rayburn also appeared to be at odds with the Trump administration’s broader approach to Syria. Under special envoy Tom Barrack, the U.S. has pushed hard to engage the government of President Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former jihadist fighter who claims to have moderated his views. U.S. efforts have included increased cooperation with Sharaa’s government on anti-ISIS measures as well as a full-court press in Congress to repeal crippling sanctions on Syria.

But Rayburn has been more skeptical of the potential fruits of engagement. Shortly after the fall of the Assad regime in December of last year, he tweeted that Sharaa “must be delusional” if he thinks Syrians will “sit still as he installs himself as another dictator in Assad’s place.” The Economist reported days later that Rayburn hoped to pressure Sharaa’s government by keeping sanctions in force. As of May, Rayburn remained one of the leading skeptics of engagement in Trump’s orbit, according to a CNN report. (Rayburn repeatedly insisted during his confirmation hearing that he would enact Trump’s policy toward Syria.)

The Trump administration has yet to give a reason for withdrawing Rayburn’s nomination. The decision to pull Rayburn from consideration comes just a week after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to advance his nomination to the full Senate.

The move contributes to a sense of uncertainty in the State Department’s Middle East bureau, which has experienced infighting under the leadership of Mora Namdar, who is serving as an interim leader for the office as she awaits confirmation to a consular position. Reports indicate that Namdar, an Iran hawk who worked in a media role in the first Trump administration, has elevated loyalists and sidelined more experienced diplomats.

“If you’re not inside her specific circle, you’re truly left out,” a source with knowledge of Namdar’s management style told RS, adding that Namdar’s “game of promotions and demotions” has “affected the morale of the NEA staff.”

“Instead of having experts in leadership positions, people who are either chummy with Mora or have specific ideological viewpoints end up being elevated over people who have done their time and their work in specific areas,” the source said. Notably, long-time State official Timothy Lenderking left NEA in August and moved to a less prominent bureau in the department, though it is unclear whether Namdar had a hand in that move.

In response to previous reporting on this topic, the State Department defended Namdar and said she is “elevating personnel who have proven that they have the merit, expertise and experience to best implement President Trump’s agenda.”

Namdar faced similar accusations during the first Trump administration, when she worked in the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which previously oversaw several U.S.-funded news sites. A State Department inspector general report found that, in order to justify the firing of several senior executives at USAGM, Namdar told an official to create a “risk profile” of the employees with “any negative information he had heard about the individuals, regardless of whether he could verify the information.” Namdar “told him to add even rumors that he ‘heard in the halls,’” according to the report.

While outside government, Namdar sharply criticized the Biden administration for attempting to negotiate with Iran, urging the U.S. to impose “sweeping sanctions” on Iranian officials, who she claimed were carrying out a “genocide” against the Iranian people. Earlier this year, anonymous officials accused Namdar of interfering in the collection of information about Iran, including one incident in which she ordered memos to be rewritten in order to be “more pessimistic toward the Iranian government’s prospects,” according to the Washington Post.

It remains unclear how long Namdar will remain in her interim position. Last week, she went before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a hearing about her nomination to serve as assistant secretary of state for consular affairs, but her confirmation to that position could still take months. In the meantime, Trump has yet to indicate who may replace Rayburn as the nominee for the influential job that Namdar now holds.


Top image credit: Joel Rayburn appears before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during his confirmation meeting in May, 2025. (Screengrab via senate.gov)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
Ro Khanna Jon Fetterman
Top photo credit: Ro Khanna (creative commons/WebSummitt ) and Jon Fetterman (shutterstock/EB Photos)

Fury and fanboys: US, world leaders react to US-Israeli war on Iran

QiOSK

The reactions are already coming in following the early morning attacks on Iran by U.S. and Israeli forces in what is being called "Operation Epic Fury." The reports are fluid, but as President Trump announced on his Truth Social, the U.S. is taking aim at Iran's military and senior leadership and hopes to raze both so that the Iranian people can take over. "When we are finished the government is yours to take. Your hour of freedom is at hand."

For some, like U.S. Senator Jon Fetterman, a Democrat who represents the people of Pennsylvania, this is the greatest thing to happen since the last time the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in June. "President Trump has been willing to do what’s right and necessary to produce real peace in the region. God bless the United States, our great military, and Israel."

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.