Follow us on social

google cta
‘Not defendable’: Top enlisted brass blast conditions for soldiers

‘Not defendable’: Top enlisted brass blast conditions for soldiers

The 'quality of life' for military and their families has become a persistent problem, and it's feeding into the recruitment crisis

Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

U.S. soldiers face a quality-of-living crisis as the Pentagon’s recruitment woes persist, according to top-ranking enlisted officers from across the U.S. military.

“We’ve had a break in trust with our American people,” said Master Chief James Honea, the top enlisted adviser to Navy leadership, in a Wednesday congressional hearing. “We have to do much better at taking care” of our service members, Honea said, adding that he doesn’t want the military to “reach a breaking point” where more people decide to leave the military.

Officers and members of Congress highlighted poorly maintained barracks, food insecurity, sexual violence, and limited access to healthcare and childcare as key problems facing U.S. soldiers today. Economic problems are particularly acute among military families, who often struggle to find jobs for civilian spouses and proper food and healthcare for their children.

“It's time for our actions to match up with our words, as far as putting families above everything else,” said Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas).

The hearing gives insight into why the military is struggling to recruit soldiers even as Pentagon bigwigs prepare for a potential war with China in the coming years. According to a newly released Blue Star Families survey, only 32% of active-duty military families would recommend service to others — a 23-point drop since 2016.

While the reasons for this are diverse, a few numbers stand out. One in six active-duty military families reported food insecurity in 2023, and that jumps up to one in four among the families of enlisted soldiers. Military families also reported longer wait times for accessing healthcare than their civilian counterparts, and 8% of active-duty soldiers said they “seriously considered suicide in the past year,” as compared to 5% among U.S. adults as a whole, according to the Blue Star Families survey.

Housing is another problematic area for recruitment and retention. Despite record-high military spending, some enlisted soldiers are living in poorly maintained barracks that have mold, brown tap water, and serious safety issues, according to a recent report by the Government Accountability Office. The report, which also noted a $137 billion backlog of barracks maintenance costs, sparked condemnation from members of Congress.

“This is unacceptable,” tweeted Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.). “Our service members & their families already sacrifice so much to keep us safe and the least we can do is ensure they have quality housing.”

The problems with barracks are “not defendable,” said Sergeant Major Carlos Ruiz, the Marine Corps’ top enlisted officer. The Marine Corps is working to add air conditioning to all bases in hotter climates, Ruiz told Congress, adding that the service has refurbished 30 barracks in the past five years. Leaders from across the military said they hope to bring on full-time managers and repair crews to get living facilities back into shape.

Notably, the Biden administration’s proposed budget for next year contains funding to help remedy some quality-of-life issues, including expanded food assistance programs, suicide and sexual assault prevention efforts, and a 4.5% raise for soldiers. But the request falls short when it comes to funding for refurbishing barracks and improving facilities on bases.

Given the gap in funding, the Marine Corps has gone around the White House to request an additional $642 million from Congress for barracks restoration and other “quality of life” improvements for service members. This request came through the controversial but congressionally mandated “wish list” policy, under which all services and combatant commands must tell lawmakers which goodies they want on top of the president’s budget.

Watchdogs have long argued that these wish lists are a backdoor way to force Congress to boost the Pentagon’s total funding. “Far too often, they'll put lower priority things in the base budget, and then put higher priority items in the unfunded priorities list saying, ‘hey, we really need this,’” Dan Grazier of the Project on Government Oversight told RS last year.

But this game of hide-the-ball may be more complicated this time around given that next year’s spending will be constrained by budgetary caps imposed as part of a 2023 deal to lift the debt ceiling. President Joe Biden’s military budget request is tailored to fit within its $895 billion cap for next year, leaving little room for funding other proposals.

Officers lamented that so-called urgent needs — like funding for expanded military operations in the Middle East to contain the Gaza war — tend to beat out requests for quality-of-life improvements for front-line service members. “I don't think these things should be in competition with one another,” said Honea.


Sergeant Major Michael Weimer, Master Chief James Honea, and Sergeant Major Carlos Ruiz testify before the House Appropriations Subcommittee for Military Construction and Veterans Affairs on March 20, 2024. (Screengrab via appropriations.house.gov)

google cta
Reporting | Washington Politics
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.