Follow us on social

google cta
Lawmakers owning defense stocks: How corrupt is that?

Lawmakers owning defense stocks: How corrupt is that?

New episode of Always at War explores how members of Congress are trading millions in equities while managing US military strategy (VIDEO)

Analysis | Video Section
google cta
google cta

Should the people who craft the Pentagon’s budget be allowed to own stocks in the very same companies whose profits are determined by Pentagon contracts?

Obviously not — this is an enormous conflict of interest! But that’s exactly how things work in Congress today. In 2024, 50 members of Congress traded between $24 million and $113 million worth of Pentagon contractor stocks on the side, while at work they were writing the military budgets that determined which weapons companies receive multi-billion dollar contracts.

In this episode of Always at War, we explore how this open secret — that our members of Congress are personally invested in America’s war machine — keeps our country perpetually at war. With the help of Public Citizen’s Savannah Wooten, we navigate how the military-industrial complex has woven a complex web of financial and political incentives to keep politicians from questioning either our $1 trillion Pentagon budget or the disastrous cover-the-globe foreign policy it enables.

We reveal how defense stocks consistently surge during military conflicts — jumping after the Soleimani assassination, Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, and throughout the wars in Ukraine and Gaza — creating direct financial incentives for lawmakers to support military interventions over diplomatic solutions. Through suspiciously timed trades, like lawmakers buying Lockheed Martin stock days before an $11 billion contract announcement, we show how the military-industrial-congressional complex that Eisenhower warned about has evolved into a system where peace literally costs politicians money.

When the people writing checks to weapons companies own stock in those same companies, every vote for military action becomes a vote for personal profit — helping to explain why America's wars never seem to end and the Pentagon budget just keeps growing, without making Americans any safer.


Top Image Credit: Congress is Getting Rich Off War Stocks. Always at War #3 (YouTube)

google cta
Analysis | Video Section
NPT
Top image credit: Milos Ruzicka via shutterstock.com

We are sleepwalking into nuclear catastrophe

Global Crises

In May of his first year as president, John F. Kennedy met with Israeli President David Ben-Gurion to discuss Israel’s nuclear program and the new nuclear power plant at Dimona.

Writing about the so-called “nuclear summit” in “A State at Any Cost: The Life of David Ben-Gurion,” Israeli historian Tom Segev states that during this meeting, “Ben-Gurion did not get much from the president, who left no doubt that he would not permit Israel to develop nuclear weapons.”

keep readingShow less
Ambassador Robert Hunter
Top photo credit: Former NATO Ambassador Robert Hunter at the American Academy of Diplomacy's 17th Annual Awards Luncheon, 12/14/2006. (Reuters)

RIP Amb. Robert Hunter, who warned about NATO expansion

Europe

The world of foreign policy restraint is poorer today with the passing of Robert Hunter, an American diplomat, who was the U.S. ambassador to NATO in 1993-1998. He also served as a senior official on both the Western Europe and Middle East desks in President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Council.

For decades, Hunter was a prominent, sober, and necessary voice of restraint in Washington. To readers of Responsible Statecraft, he was an occasional author who shared his insights, particularly on Europe. To those of us who knew Robert personally, he was a mentor and a friend whose tremendous knowledge was matched only by his generosity in sharing it.

keep readingShow less
NATO Summit 2025
Top photo credit: NATO Summit, the Hague, June 25, 2025. (Republic of Slovenia/Daniel Novakovič/STA/flickr)

Will NATO survive Trump?

Europe

Over the weekend, President Donald Trump threatened to place new punitive tariffs on European allies until they acquiesce to his designs on Greenland, an escalation of his ongoing attempts to acquire the large Arctic island for the United States.

Critics loudly decried the move as devastating for the transatlantic relationship, echoing Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Fredericksen’s earlier warning that a coercive U.S. seizure of the semi-autonomous Danish territory would mean the end of NATO.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.