Follow us on social

google cta
Lawmakers owning defense stocks: How corrupt is that?

Lawmakers owning defense stocks: How corrupt is that?

New episode of Always at War explores how members of Congress are trading millions in equities while managing US military strategy (VIDEO)

Analysis | Video Section
google cta
google cta

Should the people who craft the Pentagon’s budget be allowed to own stocks in the very same companies whose profits are determined by Pentagon contracts?

Obviously not — this is an enormous conflict of interest! But that’s exactly how things work in Congress today. In 2024, 50 members of Congress traded between $24 million and $113 million worth of Pentagon contractor stocks on the side, while at work they were writing the military budgets that determined which weapons companies receive multi-billion dollar contracts.

In this episode of Always at War, we explore how this open secret — that our members of Congress are personally invested in America’s war machine — keeps our country perpetually at war. With the help of Public Citizen’s Savannah Wooten, we navigate how the military-industrial complex has woven a complex web of financial and political incentives to keep politicians from questioning either our $1 trillion Pentagon budget or the disastrous cover-the-globe foreign policy it enables.

We reveal how defense stocks consistently surge during military conflicts — jumping after the Soleimani assassination, Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, and throughout the wars in Ukraine and Gaza — creating direct financial incentives for lawmakers to support military interventions over diplomatic solutions. Through suspiciously timed trades, like lawmakers buying Lockheed Martin stock days before an $11 billion contract announcement, we show how the military-industrial-congressional complex that Eisenhower warned about has evolved into a system where peace literally costs politicians money.

When the people writing checks to weapons companies own stock in those same companies, every vote for military action becomes a vote for personal profit — helping to explain why America's wars never seem to end and the Pentagon budget just keeps growing, without making Americans any safer.


Top Image Credit: Congress is Getting Rich Off War Stocks. Always at War #3 (YouTube)

google cta
Analysis | Video Section
Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran
Top image credit: Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby speaks at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. (Screengrab via armed-services.senate.gov)

Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran

QiOSK

The U.S. is pursuing “scoped and reasonable objectives” in its military campaign against Iran and is not seeking regime change through force, argued Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby in a Tuesday Senate hearing.

When pressed about why the campaign began with the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Colby declined to comment directly. “I’m talking about the goals of the American military campaign,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Those are Israeli operations.”

keep readingShow less
US missiles
Top photo credit: . DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Vince Parker, U.S. Air Force.

Trump: We have 'unlimited' weapons to fight 'forever' war

QiOSK

In a startling Truth Social post overnight on Monday, President Donald Trump defied reality and claimed that U.S. weapons were "unlimited" and the U.S. could fight "forever" with "these supplies."


keep readingShow less
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.