Follow us on social

google cta
Congress

Does the House have the grit to 'Block the Bombs' to Israel?

Lawmakers returning from recess have a chance to do what their constituents are telling them to — stop US complicity in Gaza carnage

Analysis | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

Members of Congress are wrapping up August recess in their home districts and preparing to return to Capitol Hill. And if public polling is any indication, they’ve been facing constituents who want to know why their taxpayer dollars are enabling the carnage in Gaza, and what Congress is doing to put an end to it.

If they are smart, lawmakers can work to end U.S. complicity by supporting the “Block the Bombs” bill, a proposal to block sales of bombs and explosive shells to Israel.

Introduced by Reps. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.), Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) in May, the bill, H.R. 3565, is the best benchmark for House legislators’ commitment to stop arming atrocities in Gaza. It is the only House bill proposed to do so, and it is gaining momentum, with 30 other legislators already cosponsoring.

Block the Bombs would prohibit the U.S. government from selling Israel the weapons most implicated in the decimation of Gaza: bombs, bomb guidance kits, artillery shells, and mortar shells. When used in populated areas, these types of weapons kill civilians and destroy the vital infrastructure that keeps them alive. Extensive documentation by human rights groups and investigators ties these weapons to war crimes in Gaza.

The Israeli military has killed more than 55,000 Palestinians in its nearly two-year assault on Gaza. Thousands more are dying from starvation and disease caused by Israeli government restrictions on humanitarian aid and attacks on vital medical, water, and sanitation infrastructure. The latest alert from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification — the world's leading body on hunger — warned that the “worst-case scenario of Famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip.”

All of this is made possible with U.S. weapons and funding. The Biden administration sent an enormous amount of weapons to the Israeli military in the first ten months of the war alone. Tens of billions of dollars in weapons sales have gone forward since, and the Trump administration removed the limited restrictions President Biden put in place. In February this year alone, the Trump administration notified Congress of over $11 billion more in lethal weapons to Israel.

These weapons kill and maim Palestinian civilians in Gaza. In March, the Israeli military dropped a U.S.-made bomb on a crowded cafe, killing at least 26 people. In April, Israeli forces used another American-made bomb to attack a displacement camp, killing dozens of Palestinians. U.S. weapons sales also send a clear political signal of American support for Israel’s conduct and the near total siege of Gaza.

The United States has the leverage to end this catastrophe and demand humanitarian access, the protection of civilians, and a ceasefire — but refuses to use it.

The U.S. Senate has taken multiple votes aimed at blocking arms sales to Israel using the Joint Resolution of Disapproval mechanism built into the Arms Export Control Act, the main body of legislation governing U.S. arms transfers. In July, 27 Senators voted to block a sale of rifles to Israel — the largest number of U.S. senators opposing arms to Israel to date — citing Israeli restrictions on aid as children in Gaza starve to death before our eyes.

But these sorts of votes aren’t possible in the House of Representatives due to differences in procedural rules. As a result, House members have had few clear-cut opportunities to vote to stop arms sales to Israel. A recent vote didn’t deal with the weapons used to kill civilians in Gaza, and past votes have centered on huge funding packages covering a wide range of purposes.

Without a record of votes, the key question constituents should ask their representatives is: have you co-sponsored the Block the Bombs bill?

Sixty percent of Americans oppose the Israeli military’s actions in Gaza. If that statistic is any indication, the Block the Bombs bill has ample room to build support in the House of Representatives. Cosponsorship of the bill sends a clear message that many lawmakers have been too slow to say: as Palestinian civilians die of starvation, under gunfire, and in near-constant bombings, American weapons sales to the Israeli government cannot continue.

A majority of Senate Democrats voted last month against a major arms sale to Israel. It’s time for the House to catch up, and Block the Bombs is a way to do that.


Top image credit: Bill Perry via shutterstock.com
google cta
Analysis | Washington Politics
South Africa: Between Iran and a hard place (Donald Trump)
Top photo credit: President Cyril Ramaphosa (Photo: GCIS/Flickr) and Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

South Africa: Between Iran and a hard place (Donald Trump)

Africa

South Africa is struggling to unfurl its wings as a leading middle power and advance its relations with its fellow BRICS members while keeping out of the cross hairs of the U.S. president. This has been particularly hard considering that one member of the Global South grouping — Iran — is on Donald Trump’s current list of potential military targets.

South Africa joined BRICS in 2006. The organization is supposed to serve as an intergovernmental forum for member countries to connect on issues related to diplomacy, security, and economics. But the bloc has angered President Trump, who sees it as a threat to American leadership, particularly given China’s membership in the group.

keep readingShow less
Trump Khamanei
Top image credit: Bella1105/shutterstock.com

Could Trump bomb Iran before settling on a rationale?

Middle East

Shifting justifications for a war are never a good sign, and they strongly suggest that the war in question was not warranted.

In the Vietnam War, the principal public rationale of saving South Vietnam from communism got replaced in the minds of the warmakers — especially after losing hope of winning the contest in Vietnam — by the belief that the United States had to keep fighting to preserve its credibility. In the Iraq War, when President George W. Bush’s prewar argument about weapons of mass destruction fell apart, he shifted to a rationale centered on bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq.

keep readingShow less
James Holtsnider
Top image credit: James Holtsnider, U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be ambassador to Jordan, testifies before a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on nominations on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 11, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

New US ambassador's charm offensive is backfiring in Jordan

Middle East

Since arriving in Amman around three months ago to serve as the U.S. Ambassador to Jordan, James Holtsnider quickly became one of the highest-profile envoys in the Hashemite Kingdom. In addition to presenting his credentials to King Abdullah II, Holtsnider has met with Jordanian soccer players, attended weddings, and joined tribal gatherings.

However, a January 14 request by a U.S. Embassy delegation for the ambassador to offer condolences at the family home of former Karak mayor Abdullah Al-Dmour showed that many Jordanians have little interest in participating in Holtsnider’s public relations initiative. Dmour’s relatives rejected the U.S. ambassador’s wish to visit. Dmour’s tribe issued a statement noting Holtsnider’s request “violates Jordanian tribal customs, which separates the sanctity of mourning from any political presence with public implications.”

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.